欧洲长期护理市场化:政治经济学框架

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Julien Mercille
{"title":"欧洲长期护理市场化:政治经济学框架","authors":"Julien Mercille","doi":"10.1111/spol.13013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of European long-term care (LTC) marketisation is dominated by institutional and ideational perspectives. In contrast, political economic theoretical frameworks have received little attention. This is paradoxical, because marketisation is an inherently political economic phenomenon. The financialisation of LTC systems, the growth of private for-profit providers and the rise in cross-national investments are proceeding apace, yet, they have been neglected by conventional approaches. This paper presents a political economy theoretical framework to study LTC marketisation. In contrast to conventional perspectives, it locates the drivers of marketisation within (neoliberal) capitalism; conceives of the state as significantly aligned with the interests of the business sector; interprets ideology as often originating in the material interests of the latter; examines ‘power struggles’ between, in particular, private providers on one hand and the public/non-profit sector and care workers on the other hand. These power struggles take place in LTC financing, privatisation, regulation, financialisation and labour flexibility. In those struggles, private providers assert their power (structural, institutional and instrumental) to shape marketisation; however, they can encounter resistance. The framework also examines the outcomes of marketisation and is illustrated empirically by reference to Irish LTC.","PeriodicalId":47858,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy & Administration","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European long-term care marketisation: A political economy framework\",\"authors\":\"Julien Mercille\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spol.13013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of European long-term care (LTC) marketisation is dominated by institutional and ideational perspectives. In contrast, political economic theoretical frameworks have received little attention. This is paradoxical, because marketisation is an inherently political economic phenomenon. The financialisation of LTC systems, the growth of private for-profit providers and the rise in cross-national investments are proceeding apace, yet, they have been neglected by conventional approaches. This paper presents a political economy theoretical framework to study LTC marketisation. In contrast to conventional perspectives, it locates the drivers of marketisation within (neoliberal) capitalism; conceives of the state as significantly aligned with the interests of the business sector; interprets ideology as often originating in the material interests of the latter; examines ‘power struggles’ between, in particular, private providers on one hand and the public/non-profit sector and care workers on the other hand. These power struggles take place in LTC financing, privatisation, regulation, financialisation and labour flexibility. In those struggles, private providers assert their power (structural, institutional and instrumental) to shape marketisation; however, they can encounter resistance. The framework also examines the outcomes of marketisation and is illustrated empirically by reference to Irish LTC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Policy & Administration\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Policy & Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.13013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对欧洲长期护理(LTC)市场化的研究主要从制度和意识形态的角度进行。相比之下,政治经济学理论框架却很少受到关注。这是自相矛盾的,因为市场化本质上是一种政治经济现象。长期护理系统的金融化、私营营利性提供商的增长以及跨国投资的增加都在快速推进,但传统方法却忽视了这一点。本文提出了一个研究长期护理市场化的政治经济学理论框架。与传统观点不同的是,本文将市场化的驱动力定位在(新自由主义)资本主义内部;认为国家与商业部门的利益高度一致;将意识形态解释为往往源于后者的物质利益;研究特别是私营供应商与公共/非营利部门和护理人员之间的 "权力斗争"。这些权力斗争发生在长期护理融资、私有化、监管、金融化和劳动力灵活性等方面。在这些权力斗争中,私营机构主张其权力(结构性权力、制度性权力和工具性权力)来塑造市场化;然而,他们也会遇到阻力。该框架还研究了市场化的结果,并以爱尔兰的长期护理服务为例进行了实证说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European long-term care marketisation: A political economy framework
The study of European long-term care (LTC) marketisation is dominated by institutional and ideational perspectives. In contrast, political economic theoretical frameworks have received little attention. This is paradoxical, because marketisation is an inherently political economic phenomenon. The financialisation of LTC systems, the growth of private for-profit providers and the rise in cross-national investments are proceeding apace, yet, they have been neglected by conventional approaches. This paper presents a political economy theoretical framework to study LTC marketisation. In contrast to conventional perspectives, it locates the drivers of marketisation within (neoliberal) capitalism; conceives of the state as significantly aligned with the interests of the business sector; interprets ideology as often originating in the material interests of the latter; examines ‘power struggles’ between, in particular, private providers on one hand and the public/non-profit sector and care workers on the other hand. These power struggles take place in LTC financing, privatisation, regulation, financialisation and labour flexibility. In those struggles, private providers assert their power (structural, institutional and instrumental) to shape marketisation; however, they can encounter resistance. The framework also examines the outcomes of marketisation and is illustrated empirically by reference to Irish LTC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Social Policy & Administration is the longest established journal in its field. Whilst remaining faithful to its tradition in academic excellence, the journal also seeks to engender debate about topical and controversial issues. Typical numbers contain papers clustered around a theme. The journal is international in scope. Quality contributions are received from scholars world-wide and cover social policy issues not only in Europe but in the USA, Canada, Australia and Asia Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信