二年级和三年级医科学生在急诊科的临床表现

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ines Hoxha MD, Daniel J. Hekman MS, Benjamin Schnapp MD, Med
{"title":"二年级和三年级医科学生在急诊科的临床表现","authors":"Ines Hoxha MD,&nbsp;Daniel J. Hekman MS,&nbsp;Benjamin Schnapp MD, Med","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Experiential learning theory suggests that direct clinical experiences facilitate learning. Previous literature has focused primarily on the experiences of fourth-year medical students. As more students gain early clinical exposure, it is important to understand the types of patients seen by junior students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to categorize the clinical experiences of early (M2 and M3) students in the emergency department (ED).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review of the electronic health record of patients seen by M2s and M3s on a 2-week emergency medicine rotation at a single urban academic ED in the Midwest was performed. Data elements extracted included total number of patients seen, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), disposition, and chief complaint. Students were not mandated to see any particular patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Medical students (248) saw 2994 total patients from 2018 to 2022. The median number of patients seen by each student was 12.0 (range 1–32). Pediatric patients made up 6.5% (<i>n</i> = 194) of total patients. Encounters were primarily ESI 2 or 3, which accounted for 89.4% of all patients (<i>n</i> = 2676). The most encountered complaints were abdominal pain, chest pain, and dyspnea, making up 15.6% (<i>n</i> = 467), 8.7% (<i>n</i> = 260), and 5.5% (<i>n</i> = 165), respectively, of total cases. Obstetrics/gynecology, hematologic, and environmental disorders were the least frequently encountered domains. No students saw all Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM)–recommended complaints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is significant variability in the ED encounters of M2s and M3s, with wide ranges of patient volume and presentations. This study provides some evidence that early students may not be meeting CDEM recommendations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10937","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second- and third-year medical students’ clinical encounters in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Ines Hoxha MD,&nbsp;Daniel J. Hekman MS,&nbsp;Benjamin Schnapp MD, Med\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Experiential learning theory suggests that direct clinical experiences facilitate learning. Previous literature has focused primarily on the experiences of fourth-year medical students. As more students gain early clinical exposure, it is important to understand the types of patients seen by junior students.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to categorize the clinical experiences of early (M2 and M3) students in the emergency department (ED).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective review of the electronic health record of patients seen by M2s and M3s on a 2-week emergency medicine rotation at a single urban academic ED in the Midwest was performed. Data elements extracted included total number of patients seen, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), disposition, and chief complaint. Students were not mandated to see any particular patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medical students (248) saw 2994 total patients from 2018 to 2022. The median number of patients seen by each student was 12.0 (range 1–32). Pediatric patients made up 6.5% (<i>n</i> = 194) of total patients. Encounters were primarily ESI 2 or 3, which accounted for 89.4% of all patients (<i>n</i> = 2676). The most encountered complaints were abdominal pain, chest pain, and dyspnea, making up 15.6% (<i>n</i> = 467), 8.7% (<i>n</i> = 260), and 5.5% (<i>n</i> = 165), respectively, of total cases. Obstetrics/gynecology, hematologic, and environmental disorders were the least frequently encountered domains. No students saw all Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM)–recommended complaints.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is significant variability in the ED encounters of M2s and M3s, with wide ranges of patient volume and presentations. This study provides some evidence that early students may not be meeting CDEM recommendations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10937\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 经验学习理论认为,直接的临床经验有助于学习。以往的文献主要关注四年级医学生的经验。随着越来越多的学生开始接触早期临床,了解低年级学生所见患者的类型就显得尤为重要。 目的 本研究旨在对低年级(M2 和 M3)学生在急诊科(ED)的临床经验进行分类。 方法 在美国中西部的一个城市学术急诊科,对 M2 和 M3 学生在为期两周的急诊科轮转中就诊病人的电子健康记录进行回顾性审查。提取的数据元素包括就诊患者总数、急诊严重程度指数(ESI)、处置和主诉。学生没有被强制要求看任何特定的病人。 结果 从 2018 年到 2022 年,医科学生(248 人)共接诊了 2994 名患者。每名学生接诊患者人数的中位数为 12.0(范围为 1-32)。儿科患者占患者总数的 6.5%(n = 194)。就诊患者主要是ESI 2或3级患者,占所有患者的89.4%(n = 2676)。最多的主诉是腹痛、胸痛和呼吸困难,分别占总病例的 15.6%(n = 467)、8.7%(n = 260)和 5.5%(n = 165)。妇产科、血液病和环境紊乱是最不常见的疾病。没有学生看过急诊科实习主任(CDEM)推荐的所有主诉。 结论 M2 和 M3 的急诊室就诊情况存在很大差异,病人数量和就诊情况也有很大不同。这项研究提供了一些证据,表明早期学生可能没有达到 CDEM 的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Second- and third-year medical students’ clinical encounters in the emergency department

Background

Experiential learning theory suggests that direct clinical experiences facilitate learning. Previous literature has focused primarily on the experiences of fourth-year medical students. As more students gain early clinical exposure, it is important to understand the types of patients seen by junior students.

Objectives

This study aims to categorize the clinical experiences of early (M2 and M3) students in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

A retrospective review of the electronic health record of patients seen by M2s and M3s on a 2-week emergency medicine rotation at a single urban academic ED in the Midwest was performed. Data elements extracted included total number of patients seen, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), disposition, and chief complaint. Students were not mandated to see any particular patients.

Results

Medical students (248) saw 2994 total patients from 2018 to 2022. The median number of patients seen by each student was 12.0 (range 1–32). Pediatric patients made up 6.5% (n = 194) of total patients. Encounters were primarily ESI 2 or 3, which accounted for 89.4% of all patients (n = 2676). The most encountered complaints were abdominal pain, chest pain, and dyspnea, making up 15.6% (n = 467), 8.7% (n = 260), and 5.5% (n = 165), respectively, of total cases. Obstetrics/gynecology, hematologic, and environmental disorders were the least frequently encountered domains. No students saw all Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM)–recommended complaints.

Conclusions

There is significant variability in the ED encounters of M2s and M3s, with wide ranges of patient volume and presentations. This study provides some evidence that early students may not be meeting CDEM recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信