为病情复杂的儿童提供医疗服务方面的城乡差异以及支付方、残疾和社区贫困的调节作用。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mary Arakelyan MPH, Seneca D. Freyleue MS, Andrew P. Schaefer PhD, Andrea M. Austin PhD, Erika L. Moen PhD, A. James O'Malley PhD, David C. Goodman MD, MS, JoAnna K. Leyenaar MD, PhD, MPH
{"title":"为病情复杂的儿童提供医疗服务方面的城乡差异以及支付方、残疾和社区贫困的调节作用。","authors":"Mary Arakelyan MPH,&nbsp;Seneca D. Freyleue MS,&nbsp;Andrew P. Schaefer PhD,&nbsp;Andrea M. Austin PhD,&nbsp;Erika L. Moen PhD,&nbsp;A. James O'Malley PhD,&nbsp;David C. Goodman MD, MS,&nbsp;JoAnna K. Leyenaar MD, PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Children with medical complexity (CMC) may be at increased risk of rural–urban disparities in health care delivery given their multifaceted health care needs, but these disparities are poorly understood. This study evaluated rural–urban disparities in health care delivery to CMC and determined whether Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disability, and community poverty modified the effects of rurality on care delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study of 2012–2017 all-payer claims data from Colorado, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire included CMC &lt;18 years. Health care delivery measures (ambulatory clinic visits, emergency department visits, acute care hospitalizations, total hospital days, and receipt of post-acute care) were compared for rural- versus urban-residing CMC in multivariable regression models, following established methods to evaluate effect modification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Of 112,475 CMC, 7307 (6.5%) were rural residing and 105,168 (93.5%) were urban residing. A total of 68.9% had Medicaid coverage, 33.9% had a disability, and 39.7% lived in communities with &gt;20% child poverty. In adjusted analyses, rural-residing CMC received significantly fewer ambulatory visits (risk ratio [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–0.96), more emergency visits (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16), and fewer hospitalization days (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.96). The estimated modification effects of rural residence by Medicaid coverage, disability, and community poverty were each statistically significant. Differences in the odds of having a hospitalization and receiving post-acute care did not persist after incorporating sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and interaction effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Rural- and urban-residing CMC differed in their receipt of health care, and Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disabilities, and community poverty modified several of these effects. These modifying effects should be considered in clinical and policy initiatives to ensure that such initiatives do not widen rural–urban disparities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural–urban disparities in health care delivery for children with medical complexity and moderating effects of payer, disability, and community poverty\",\"authors\":\"Mary Arakelyan MPH,&nbsp;Seneca D. Freyleue MS,&nbsp;Andrew P. Schaefer PhD,&nbsp;Andrea M. Austin PhD,&nbsp;Erika L. Moen PhD,&nbsp;A. James O'Malley PhD,&nbsp;David C. Goodman MD, MS,&nbsp;JoAnna K. Leyenaar MD, PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Children with medical complexity (CMC) may be at increased risk of rural–urban disparities in health care delivery given their multifaceted health care needs, but these disparities are poorly understood. This study evaluated rural–urban disparities in health care delivery to CMC and determined whether Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disability, and community poverty modified the effects of rurality on care delivery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective cohort study of 2012–2017 all-payer claims data from Colorado, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire included CMC &lt;18 years. Health care delivery measures (ambulatory clinic visits, emergency department visits, acute care hospitalizations, total hospital days, and receipt of post-acute care) were compared for rural- versus urban-residing CMC in multivariable regression models, following established methods to evaluate effect modification.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 112,475 CMC, 7307 (6.5%) were rural residing and 105,168 (93.5%) were urban residing. A total of 68.9% had Medicaid coverage, 33.9% had a disability, and 39.7% lived in communities with &gt;20% child poverty. In adjusted analyses, rural-residing CMC received significantly fewer ambulatory visits (risk ratio [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–0.96), more emergency visits (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16), and fewer hospitalization days (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.96). The estimated modification effects of rural residence by Medicaid coverage, disability, and community poverty were each statistically significant. Differences in the odds of having a hospitalization and receiving post-acute care did not persist after incorporating sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and interaction effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rural- and urban-residing CMC differed in their receipt of health care, and Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disabilities, and community poverty modified several of these effects. These modifying effects should be considered in clinical and policy initiatives to ensure that such initiatives do not widen rural–urban disparities.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12827\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医疗复杂性儿童(CMC)有多方面的医疗保健需求,因此他们在医疗保健服务方面面临城乡差异的风险可能会增加,但人们对这些差异知之甚少。本研究评估了城乡之间在为 CMC 提供医疗服务方面的差异,并确定医疗补助覆盖范围、并发残疾和社区贫困是否会改变农村地区对医疗服务的影响:这项回顾性队列研究收集了来自科罗拉多州、马萨诸塞州和新罕布什尔州的 2012-2017 年所有支付方的索赔数据,其中包括 CMC 的调查结果:在 112,475 名 CMC 中,7307 人(6.5%)居住在农村,105,168 人(93.5%)居住在城市。共有 68.9% 的人享受医疗补助,33.9% 的人有残疾,39.7% 的人生活在儿童贫困率大于 20% 的社区。在调整分析中,居住在农村的 CMC 接受的门诊次数明显较少(风险比 [RR] = 0.95,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.94-0.96),急诊次数较多(RR = 1.12,95% CI:1.08-1.16),住院天数较少(RR = 0.90,95% CI = 0.85-0.96)。农村居住地对医疗补助覆盖率、残疾和社区贫困的估计修正效应均具有显著的统计学意义。在纳入社会人口学和临床特征及交互效应后,住院和接受急性期后护理的几率差异并未持续存在:结论:居住在农村和城市的社区医疗中心在接受医疗护理方面存在差异,医疗补助覆盖范围、并发残疾和社区贫困改变了其中的一些影响。在临床和政策措施中应考虑这些影响因素,以确保这些措施不会扩大城乡差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rural–urban disparities in health care delivery for children with medical complexity and moderating effects of payer, disability, and community poverty

Purpose

Children with medical complexity (CMC) may be at increased risk of rural–urban disparities in health care delivery given their multifaceted health care needs, but these disparities are poorly understood. This study evaluated rural–urban disparities in health care delivery to CMC and determined whether Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disability, and community poverty modified the effects of rurality on care delivery.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study of 2012–2017 all-payer claims data from Colorado, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire included CMC <18 years. Health care delivery measures (ambulatory clinic visits, emergency department visits, acute care hospitalizations, total hospital days, and receipt of post-acute care) were compared for rural- versus urban-residing CMC in multivariable regression models, following established methods to evaluate effect modification.

Findings

Of 112,475 CMC, 7307 (6.5%) were rural residing and 105,168 (93.5%) were urban residing. A total of 68.9% had Medicaid coverage, 33.9% had a disability, and 39.7% lived in communities with >20% child poverty. In adjusted analyses, rural-residing CMC received significantly fewer ambulatory visits (risk ratio [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–0.96), more emergency visits (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16), and fewer hospitalization days (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.96). The estimated modification effects of rural residence by Medicaid coverage, disability, and community poverty were each statistically significant. Differences in the odds of having a hospitalization and receiving post-acute care did not persist after incorporating sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and interaction effects.

Conclusions

Rural- and urban-residing CMC differed in their receipt of health care, and Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disabilities, and community poverty modified several of these effects. These modifying effects should be considered in clinical and policy initiatives to ensure that such initiatives do not widen rural–urban disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信