三维与二维腹腔镜胃切除术治疗胃癌的长期肿瘤治疗效果:随机临床试验。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gastric Cancer Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s10120-024-01470-0
Qing Zhong, Jun-Yu Chen, Zhi-Xin Shang-Guan, Zhi-Yu Liu, Guang-Tan Lin, Dong Wu, Yi-Ming Jiang, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, Qi-Yue Chen, Ju-Li Lin, Jian-Wei Xie, Ping Li, Jun Lu, Chang-Ming Huang, Chao-Hui Zheng
{"title":"三维与二维腹腔镜胃切除术治疗胃癌的长期肿瘤治疗效果:随机临床试验。","authors":"Qing Zhong, Jun-Yu Chen, Zhi-Xin Shang-Guan, Zhi-Yu Liu, Guang-Tan Lin, Dong Wu, Yi-Ming Jiang, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, Qi-Yue Chen, Ju-Li Lin, Jian-Wei Xie, Ping Li, Jun Lu, Chang-Ming Huang, Chao-Hui Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s10120-024-01470-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LG) is rapidly gaining popularity owing to its minimal invasiveness. Previous studies have found that compared with two-dimensional (2D)-LG, three-dimensional (3D)-LG showed better short-term outcomes. However, the long-term oncological outcomes in patients with locally resectable gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this noninferiority, open-label, randomized clinical trial, a total of 438 eligible GC participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either 3D-LG or 2D-LG from January 2015 to April 2016. The primary endpoint was operating time, while the secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 401 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis, with 204 patients in the 3D group and 197 patients in the 2D group. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were comparable between the 3D and 2D groups (5-year OS: 70.6% vs. 71.1%, Log-rank P = 0.743; 5-year DFS: 68.1% vs. 69.0%, log-rank P = 0.712). No significant differences were observed between the 3D and 2D groups in the 5-year recurrence rate (28.9% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.958) or recurrence time (mean time, 22.6 vs. 20.5 months, P = 0.412). Further stratified analysis based on the type of gastrectomy, postoperative pathological staging, and preoperative BMI showed that the 5-year OS, DFS, and recurrence rates of the 3D group in each subgroup were similar to those of the 2D group (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with locally resectable GC, 3D-LG performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume professional institutions can achieve long-term oncological outcomes comparable to those of 2D-LG.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT02327481 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov ).</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"598-610"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term oncological outcomes of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Qing Zhong, Jun-Yu Chen, Zhi-Xin Shang-Guan, Zhi-Yu Liu, Guang-Tan Lin, Dong Wu, Yi-Ming Jiang, Jia-Bin Wang, Jian-Xian Lin, Qi-Yue Chen, Ju-Li Lin, Jian-Wei Xie, Ping Li, Jun Lu, Chang-Ming Huang, Chao-Hui Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10120-024-01470-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LG) is rapidly gaining popularity owing to its minimal invasiveness. Previous studies have found that compared with two-dimensional (2D)-LG, three-dimensional (3D)-LG showed better short-term outcomes. However, the long-term oncological outcomes in patients with locally resectable gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this noninferiority, open-label, randomized clinical trial, a total of 438 eligible GC participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either 3D-LG or 2D-LG from January 2015 to April 2016. The primary endpoint was operating time, while the secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 401 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis, with 204 patients in the 3D group and 197 patients in the 2D group. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were comparable between the 3D and 2D groups (5-year OS: 70.6% vs. 71.1%, Log-rank P = 0.743; 5-year DFS: 68.1% vs. 69.0%, log-rank P = 0.712). No significant differences were observed between the 3D and 2D groups in the 5-year recurrence rate (28.9% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.958) or recurrence time (mean time, 22.6 vs. 20.5 months, P = 0.412). Further stratified analysis based on the type of gastrectomy, postoperative pathological staging, and preoperative BMI showed that the 5-year OS, DFS, and recurrence rates of the 3D group in each subgroup were similar to those of the 2D group (all P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with locally resectable GC, 3D-LG performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume professional institutions can achieve long-term oncological outcomes comparable to those of 2D-LG.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT02327481 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"598-610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01470-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-024-01470-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜辅助胃切除术(LG)因其微创性而迅速普及。以往的研究发现,与二维(2D)胃切除术相比,三维(3D)胃切除术的短期疗效更好。然而,局部可切除胃癌(GC)患者的长期肿瘤治疗效果仍存在争议:在这项非劣效性、开放标签、随机临床试验中,从2015年1月到2016年4月,共有438名符合条件的GC参与者按1:1的比例被随机分配到3D-LG或2D-LG中。主要终点是手术时间,次要终点包括5年总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和复发模式:来自401名参与者的数据被纳入按方案分析,其中三维组204名患者,二维组197名患者。三维组和二维组的 5 年 OS 和 DFS 率相当(5 年 OS:70.6% vs. 71.1%,Log-rank P = 0.743;5 年 DFS:68.1% vs. 69.0%,Log-rank P = 0.712)。在5年复发率(28.9% vs. 28.9%,P = 0.958)或复发时间(平均时间22.6个月 vs. 20.5个月,P = 0.412)方面,3D组和2D组之间未观察到明显差异。根据胃切除术类型、术后病理分期和术前体重指数进行的进一步分层分析表明,各亚组中三维组的5年OS、DFS和复发率与二维组相似(P均>0.05):结论:对于局部可切除的 GC 患者,由经验丰富的外科医生在大样本量的专业机构进行 3D-LG 治疗,可获得与 2D-LG 相媲美的长期肿瘤治疗效果:NCT02327481 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov ).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-term oncological outcomes of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Long-term oncological outcomes of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Background: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LG) is rapidly gaining popularity owing to its minimal invasiveness. Previous studies have found that compared with two-dimensional (2D)-LG, three-dimensional (3D)-LG showed better short-term outcomes. However, the long-term oncological outcomes in patients with locally resectable gastric cancer (GC) remain controversial.

Methods: In this noninferiority, open-label, randomized clinical trial, a total of 438 eligible GC participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either 3D-LG or 2D-LG from January 2015 to April 2016. The primary endpoint was operating time, while the secondary endpoints included 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and recurrence pattern.

Results: Data from 401 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis, with 204 patients in the 3D group and 197 patients in the 2D group. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were comparable between the 3D and 2D groups (5-year OS: 70.6% vs. 71.1%, Log-rank P = 0.743; 5-year DFS: 68.1% vs. 69.0%, log-rank P = 0.712). No significant differences were observed between the 3D and 2D groups in the 5-year recurrence rate (28.9% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.958) or recurrence time (mean time, 22.6 vs. 20.5 months, P = 0.412). Further stratified analysis based on the type of gastrectomy, postoperative pathological staging, and preoperative BMI showed that the 5-year OS, DFS, and recurrence rates of the 3D group in each subgroup were similar to those of the 2D group (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions: For patients with locally resectable GC, 3D-LG performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume professional institutions can achieve long-term oncological outcomes comparable to those of 2D-LG.

Registration number: NCT02327481 ( http://clinicaltrials.gov ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide. The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics. Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field. With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信