上帝真的会因为我偷了一根威斯巴巧克力棒就把我送进地狱吗？

IF 0.5 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Sophia Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4

Nikk Effingham

{"title":"上帝真的会因为我偷了一根威斯巴巧克力棒就把我送进地狱吗？","authors":"Nikk Effingham","doi":"10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell—the logical problem and the evidential problem—we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.</p>","PeriodicalId":44736,"journal":{"name":"Sophia","volume":"11 12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?\",\"authors\":\"Nikk Effingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell—the logical problem and the evidential problem—we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sophia\",\"volume\":\"11 12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sophia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了地狱问题，为阿奎那-安瑟伦-爱德华兹的回应辩护，即任何不道德的行为都应受到永恒的惩罚，因为它冒犯了上帝。我认为，这种回答比人们一开始想象的更站得住脚，但也面临着严重的反对意见。如果我们把地狱的两个不同问题--逻辑问题和证据问题--区分开来，我们就会发现，根据这个反对意见，阿奎那-安瑟伦-爱德华兹的回应只解决了地狱的逻辑问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?

查看原文本刊更多论文

Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?

This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell—the logical problem and the evidential problem—we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sophia PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sophia is now published by Springer. The back files, all the way to Volume 1:1, are available via SpringerLink! Covers both analytic and continental philosophy of religionConsiders both western and non-western perspectives, including Asian and indigenousIncludes specialist contributions, e.g. on feminist and postcolonial philosophy of religionSince its inception in 1962, Sophia has been devoted to providing a forum for discussions in philosophy and religion, focusing on the interstices between metaphysics and theological thinking. The discussions take cognizance of the wider ambience of the sciences (''natural'' philosophy and human/social sciences), ethical and moral concerns in the public sphere, critical feminist theology and cross-cultural perspectives. Sophia''s cross-cultural and cross-frontier approach is reflected not only in the international composition of its editorial board, but also in its consideration of analytic, continental, Asian and indigenous responses to issues and developments in the field of philosophy of religion.