勘误：关于连续体假设在次完全强迫原理中的作用

IF 0.3 4区数学 Q1 Arts and Humanities

Archive for Mathematical Logic Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1007/s00153-024-00905-w

Gunter Fuchs

{"title":"勘误：关于连续体假设在次完全强迫原理中的作用","authors":"Gunter Fuchs","doi":"10.1007/s00153-024-00905-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this note, I will list instances where in the literature on subcomplete forcing and its forcing principles (mostly in articles of my own), the assumption of the continuum hypothesis, or that we are working above the continuum, was omitted. I state the correct statements and provide or point to correct proofs. There are also some new results, most of which revolve around showing the necessity of the extra assumption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":"63 5-6","pages":"509 - 521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Errata: on the role of the continuum hypothesis in forcing principles for subcomplete forcing\",\"authors\":\"Gunter Fuchs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00153-024-00905-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this note, I will list instances where in the literature on subcomplete forcing and its forcing principles (mostly in articles of my own), the assumption of the continuum hypothesis, or that we are working above the continuum, was omitted. I state the correct statements and provide or point to correct proofs. There are also some new results, most of which revolve around showing the necessity of the extra assumption.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"volume\":\"63 5-6\",\"pages\":\"509 - 521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-024-00905-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-024-00905-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在本说明中，我将列举在有关亚完全强迫及其强迫原理的文献中（主要是在我自己的文章中），遗漏了连续统假设或我们在连续统之上工作的假设的情况。我陈述了正确的说法，并提供或指出了正确的证明。此外，还有一些新的结果，其中大部分都围绕着证明额外假设的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Errata: on the role of the continuum hypothesis in forcing principles for subcomplete forcing

In this note, I will list instances where in the literature on subcomplete forcing and its forcing principles (mostly in articles of my own), the assumption of the continuum hypothesis, or that we are working above the continuum, was omitted. I state the correct statements and provide or point to correct proofs. There are also some new results, most of which revolve around showing the necessity of the extra assumption.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Archive for Mathematical Logic MATHEMATICS-LOGIC

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.