彰显管理教育研究的价值:教育学不是脏话

IF 4.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Katy Mason, Lisa Anderson, Kate Black, Ashley Roberts
{"title":"彰显管理教育研究的价值:教育学不是脏话","authors":"Katy Mason,&nbsp;Lisa Anderson,&nbsp;Kate Black,&nbsp;Ashley Roberts","doi":"10.1111/1467-8551.12805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Management Learning Education (MLE) research and curriculum and pedagogy innovation are urgently needed to lead our world out of crisis. If we are to take responsibility for educating future leaders of business, third- and public-sector organizations with the skills, competences and knowledge to deliver sustainable futures for the planet and people, then pedagogy cannot be a <i>dirty word</i>. In this essay, we consider <i>the state we're in</i> by looking at the juncture of <i>[climate] crisis</i>, with the lack of <i>investment in MLE research and innovation</i>, and <i>management education market misfires –</i> which together, constitute MLE as undervalued, underfunded and underdeveloped. We discuss advances in MLE theory to reveal a <i>missing middle</i> of understanding, namely between meta theories of pedagogic philosophies and values and infra theories of programme, course and project insights, as we work toward developing ‘responsible’ and ‘civic’ management schools. Drawing on our own experience as researchers, educators and pedagogy developers, and as past and present vice-chairs of the Management Knowledge and Education initiative at the British Academy of Management, we call for investments in supporting infrastructures to accelerate MLE and curriculum and pedagogy innovation, implicating learned societies, governments and higher education institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Management","volume":"35 2","pages":"539-549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8551.12805","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Shout-out for the Value of Management Education Research: ‘Pedagogy is not a Dirty Word’\",\"authors\":\"Katy Mason,&nbsp;Lisa Anderson,&nbsp;Kate Black,&nbsp;Ashley Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8551.12805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Management Learning Education (MLE) research and curriculum and pedagogy innovation are urgently needed to lead our world out of crisis. If we are to take responsibility for educating future leaders of business, third- and public-sector organizations with the skills, competences and knowledge to deliver sustainable futures for the planet and people, then pedagogy cannot be a <i>dirty word</i>. In this essay, we consider <i>the state we're in</i> by looking at the juncture of <i>[climate] crisis</i>, with the lack of <i>investment in MLE research and innovation</i>, and <i>management education market misfires –</i> which together, constitute MLE as undervalued, underfunded and underdeveloped. We discuss advances in MLE theory to reveal a <i>missing middle</i> of understanding, namely between meta theories of pedagogic philosophies and values and infra theories of programme, course and project insights, as we work toward developing ‘responsible’ and ‘civic’ management schools. Drawing on our own experience as researchers, educators and pedagogy developers, and as past and present vice-chairs of the Management Knowledge and Education initiative at the British Academy of Management, we call for investments in supporting infrastructures to accelerate MLE and curriculum and pedagogy innovation, implicating learned societies, governments and higher education institutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"539-549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8551.12805\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12805\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8551.12805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迫切需要开展管理学习教育(MLE)研究以及课程和教学法创新,以带领我们的世界走出危机。如果我们要承担起教育未来的商业、第三产业和公共部门组织领导人的责任,使其具备为地球和人类带来可持续未来的技能、能力和知识,那么教学法就不能是一个肮脏的词。在这篇文章中,我们通过审视[气候]危机、缺乏对管理教育学研究和创新的投资以及管理教育市场的失误--这些因素共同构成了管理教育学被低估、资金不足和发展不足的现状。在我们努力发展 "负责任的 "和 "公民的 "管理学院的过程中,我们讨论了管理教育和学习理论的进展,以揭示理解的缺失,即教学哲学和价值观的元理论与计划、课程和项目见解的下理论之间的缺失。作为研究者、教育者和教学法开发者,以及英国管理学院管理知识与教育计划的前任和现任副主席,我们借鉴自身的经验,呼吁对支持性基础设施进行投资,以加快管理知识与教育以及课程和教学法的创新,这牵涉到学术团体、政府和高等教育机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Shout-out for the Value of Management Education Research: ‘Pedagogy is not a Dirty Word’

A Shout-out for the Value of Management Education Research: ‘Pedagogy is not a Dirty Word’

Management Learning Education (MLE) research and curriculum and pedagogy innovation are urgently needed to lead our world out of crisis. If we are to take responsibility for educating future leaders of business, third- and public-sector organizations with the skills, competences and knowledge to deliver sustainable futures for the planet and people, then pedagogy cannot be a dirty word. In this essay, we consider the state we're in by looking at the juncture of [climate] crisis, with the lack of investment in MLE research and innovation, and management education market misfires – which together, constitute MLE as undervalued, underfunded and underdeveloped. We discuss advances in MLE theory to reveal a missing middle of understanding, namely between meta theories of pedagogic philosophies and values and infra theories of programme, course and project insights, as we work toward developing ‘responsible’ and ‘civic’ management schools. Drawing on our own experience as researchers, educators and pedagogy developers, and as past and present vice-chairs of the Management Knowledge and Education initiative at the British Academy of Management, we call for investments in supporting infrastructures to accelerate MLE and curriculum and pedagogy innovation, implicating learned societies, governments and higher education institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Management provides a valuable outlet for research and scholarship on management-orientated themes and topics. It publishes articles of a multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature as well as empirical research from within traditional disciplines and managerial functions. With contributions from around the globe, the journal includes articles across the full range of business and management disciplines. A subscription to British Journal of Management includes International Journal of Management Reviews, also published on behalf of the British Academy of Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信