从终点到终点:根据《约翰福音》20:30-31 和《约翰福音》21:24-25 发展早期基督教的纪念工作

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Stephan Witetschek
{"title":"从终点到终点:根据《约翰福音》20:30-31 和《约翰福音》21:24-25 发展早期基督教的纪念工作","authors":"Stephan Witetschek","doi":"10.30965/25890468-06801006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>John 21 is widely regarded as a secondary addition to the Gospel of John. The most important indication for this is the conclusion John 20:30–31, which may appear obsolete in view of the final conclusion John 21:24–25. Both conclusions, however, provide interesting insights into the hermeneutical positions of their respective authors in the development of Christian collective memories with regard to the deliberate selection of relevant Jesus traditions, the transition from oral tradition to literary writing, and the personalization of memory, attached to the Beloved Disciple. Based on understanding them as self-reflective documents of collective memory, the comparison of these two conclusions makes it possible to delineate two different stages in the textualization and literarization of Jesus tradition and to define their respective places on the map of early Christian collective memories.</p>","PeriodicalId":53902,"journal":{"name":"BIBLISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT","volume":"225 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Von Schluss zu Schluss: Die Entwicklung frühchristlicher Erinnerungsarbeit nach Joh 20,30–31 und Joh 21,24–25\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Witetschek\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/25890468-06801006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>John 21 is widely regarded as a secondary addition to the Gospel of John. The most important indication for this is the conclusion John 20:30–31, which may appear obsolete in view of the final conclusion John 21:24–25. Both conclusions, however, provide interesting insights into the hermeneutical positions of their respective authors in the development of Christian collective memories with regard to the deliberate selection of relevant Jesus traditions, the transition from oral tradition to literary writing, and the personalization of memory, attached to the Beloved Disciple. Based on understanding them as self-reflective documents of collective memory, the comparison of these two conclusions makes it possible to delineate two different stages in the textualization and literarization of Jesus tradition and to define their respective places on the map of early Christian collective memories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BIBLISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT\",\"volume\":\"225 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BIBLISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/25890468-06801006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIBLISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/25890468-06801006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约翰福音》第 21 章被广泛认为是《约翰福音》的次要补充。最重要的迹象是约翰福音 20:30-31 的结论,鉴于约翰福音 21:24-25 的最终结论,该结论似乎已经过时。然而,这两个结论都提供了有趣的见解,让人了解各自作者在基督教集体记忆发展过程中的诠释学立场,包括对相关耶稣传统的慎重选择、从口述传统到文学写作的过渡,以及记忆的个人化(附在所爱的门徒身上)。基于将它们理解为集体记忆的自我反思性文献,对这两个结论进行比较,可以划分出耶稣传统文本化和文学化的两个不同阶段,并确定它们各自在早期基督教集体记忆地图上的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Von Schluss zu Schluss: Die Entwicklung frühchristlicher Erinnerungsarbeit nach Joh 20,30–31 und Joh 21,24–25

John 21 is widely regarded as a secondary addition to the Gospel of John. The most important indication for this is the conclusion John 20:30–31, which may appear obsolete in view of the final conclusion John 21:24–25. Both conclusions, however, provide interesting insights into the hermeneutical positions of their respective authors in the development of Christian collective memories with regard to the deliberate selection of relevant Jesus traditions, the transition from oral tradition to literary writing, and the personalization of memory, attached to the Beloved Disciple. Based on understanding them as self-reflective documents of collective memory, the comparison of these two conclusions makes it possible to delineate two different stages in the textualization and literarization of Jesus tradition and to define their respective places on the map of early Christian collective memories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信