美国的经济发展、不平等和社会运动动态:理论与定量分析

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
Sargis Karavardanyan
{"title":"美国的经济发展、不平等和社会运动动态:理论与定量分析","authors":"Sargis Karavardanyan","doi":"10.1007/s40953-024-00383-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How have social movements in the United States been impacted by simultaneously evolving economic realities such as episodes of development and inequality across time? This paper empirically examines how the structural forces of the economy such as growth (income per-capita) and decline (income inequality) interact with the regional characteristics to derive patterns of social movements in United States from 1960 to 1995. I suggest that—unlike the arguments found in popular social movement theories such as <i>relative deprivation</i> and <i>economic grievances</i> that the society will express resentment against lack of financial resources through protesting and riots—there will be less collective action formations during heightened inequality even when there is growth in per-capita income. This paper provides novel application of methodological approaches in social movement studies such as the Generalized Additive Models with smoothing functions and Synthetic Control Method to extract micro-level inferences on the relationship between economic factors and social movement formations. I gauge the implications of the main argument with a new dataset that is a composition of aggregated levels of social movements per-capita, real per-capita personal income, income inequality index, labor unemployment laws, social policy liberalization index and equal pay laws among other variables. The empirical exercises reveal that when accounting for the full range of socio-economic variables with fixed effects and instrumental variables, the dual impact of economic growth and decline on social movements is non-linear and U-shaped in the US states across time.</p>","PeriodicalId":42219,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Development, Inequality and Dynamics of Social Movements in the United States: Theory and Quantitative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sargis Karavardanyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40953-024-00383-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>How have social movements in the United States been impacted by simultaneously evolving economic realities such as episodes of development and inequality across time? This paper empirically examines how the structural forces of the economy such as growth (income per-capita) and decline (income inequality) interact with the regional characteristics to derive patterns of social movements in United States from 1960 to 1995. I suggest that—unlike the arguments found in popular social movement theories such as <i>relative deprivation</i> and <i>economic grievances</i> that the society will express resentment against lack of financial resources through protesting and riots—there will be less collective action formations during heightened inequality even when there is growth in per-capita income. This paper provides novel application of methodological approaches in social movement studies such as the Generalized Additive Models with smoothing functions and Synthetic Control Method to extract micro-level inferences on the relationship between economic factors and social movement formations. I gauge the implications of the main argument with a new dataset that is a composition of aggregated levels of social movements per-capita, real per-capita personal income, income inequality index, labor unemployment laws, social policy liberalization index and equal pay laws among other variables. The empirical exercises reveal that when accounting for the full range of socio-economic variables with fixed effects and instrumental variables, the dual impact of economic growth and decline on social movements is non-linear and U-shaped in the US states across time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00383-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00383-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的社会运动是如何受到同时不断演变的经济现实(如不同时期的发展和不平等现象)的影响的?本文通过实证研究,探讨了经济增长(人均收入)和衰退(收入不平等)等经济结构性力量如何与地区特征相互作用,从而得出美国 1960 年至 1995 年的社会运动模式。我认为,与流行的社会运动理论(如相对剥夺和经济不满)中关于社会将通过抗议和骚乱来表达对经济资源匮乏的不满的论点不同,在不平等加剧的情况下,即使人均收入有所增长,集体行动的形成也会减少。本文新颖地应用了社会运动研究的方法论,如带平滑函数的广义加法模型和合成控制法,以提取经济因素与社会运动形成之间关系的微观推论。我用一个新的数据集来衡量主要论点的含义,该数据集由人均社会运动、实际人均个人收入、收入不平等指数、劳动失业法、社会政策自由化指数和同工同酬法等变量的综合水平组成。实证分析表明,当使用固定效应和工具变量来考虑所有社会经济变量时,在美国各州,经济增长和衰退对社会运动的双重影响是非线性和 U 型的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Economic Development, Inequality and Dynamics of Social Movements in the United States: Theory and Quantitative Analysis

Economic Development, Inequality and Dynamics of Social Movements in the United States: Theory and Quantitative Analysis

How have social movements in the United States been impacted by simultaneously evolving economic realities such as episodes of development and inequality across time? This paper empirically examines how the structural forces of the economy such as growth (income per-capita) and decline (income inequality) interact with the regional characteristics to derive patterns of social movements in United States from 1960 to 1995. I suggest that—unlike the arguments found in popular social movement theories such as relative deprivation and economic grievances that the society will express resentment against lack of financial resources through protesting and riots—there will be less collective action formations during heightened inequality even when there is growth in per-capita income. This paper provides novel application of methodological approaches in social movement studies such as the Generalized Additive Models with smoothing functions and Synthetic Control Method to extract micro-level inferences on the relationship between economic factors and social movement formations. I gauge the implications of the main argument with a new dataset that is a composition of aggregated levels of social movements per-capita, real per-capita personal income, income inequality index, labor unemployment laws, social policy liberalization index and equal pay laws among other variables. The empirical exercises reveal that when accounting for the full range of socio-economic variables with fixed effects and instrumental variables, the dual impact of economic growth and decline on social movements is non-linear and U-shaped in the US states across time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Quantitative Economics (JQEC) is a refereed journal of the Indian Econometric Society (TIES). It solicits quantitative papers with basic or applied research orientation in all sub-fields of Economics that employ rigorous theoretical, empirical and experimental methods. The Journal also encourages Short Papers and Review Articles. Innovative and fundamental papers that focus on various facets of Economics of the Emerging Market and Developing Economies are particularly welcome. With the help of an international Editorial board and carefully selected referees, it aims to minimize the time taken to complete the review process while preserving the quality of the articles published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信