Chris G Maher, Christopher S Han, Stephen E Gilbert, Michael K Nicholas
{"title":"对澳大利亚疼痛诊所网站上宣传的腰背痛干预措施进行内容分析。","authors":"Chris G Maher, Christopher S Han, Stephen E Gilbert, Michael K Nicholas","doi":"10.1071/PY23164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Internet is a widely used source of health information, yet the accuracy of online information can be low. This is the case for low back pain (LBP), where much of the information about LBP treatment is poor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research conducted a content analysis to explore what pain treatments for LBP are presented to the public on websites of Australian pain clinics listed in the PainAustralia National Pain Services Directory. Websites providing information relevant to the treatment of LBP were included. Details of the treatments for LBP offered by each pain service were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 173 pain services were included, with these services linking to 100 unique websites. Services were predominantly under private ownership and located in urban areas, with limited services in non-urban locations. Websites provided detail on a median of six (IQR 3-8) treatments, with detail on a higher number of treatments provided by services in the private sector. Physical, psychological and educational treatments were offered by the majority of pain services, whereas surgical and workplace-focused treatments were offered by relatively few services. Most services provided details on multidisciplinary care; however, interdisciplinary, coordinated care characterised by case-conferencing was infrequently mentioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most websites provided details on treatments that were largely in-line with recommended care for LBP, but some were not, especially in private clinics. However, whether the information provided online is a true reflection of the services offered in clinics remains to be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A content analysis of the interventions for low back pain promoted on the websites of Australian pain clinics.\",\"authors\":\"Chris G Maher, Christopher S Han, Stephen E Gilbert, Michael K Nicholas\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY23164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Internet is a widely used source of health information, yet the accuracy of online information can be low. This is the case for low back pain (LBP), where much of the information about LBP treatment is poor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research conducted a content analysis to explore what pain treatments for LBP are presented to the public on websites of Australian pain clinics listed in the PainAustralia National Pain Services Directory. Websites providing information relevant to the treatment of LBP were included. Details of the treatments for LBP offered by each pain service were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 173 pain services were included, with these services linking to 100 unique websites. Services were predominantly under private ownership and located in urban areas, with limited services in non-urban locations. Websites provided detail on a median of six (IQR 3-8) treatments, with detail on a higher number of treatments provided by services in the private sector. Physical, psychological and educational treatments were offered by the majority of pain services, whereas surgical and workplace-focused treatments were offered by relatively few services. Most services provided details on multidisciplinary care; however, interdisciplinary, coordinated care characterised by case-conferencing was infrequently mentioned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most websites provided details on treatments that were largely in-line with recommended care for LBP, but some were not, especially in private clinics. However, whether the information provided online is a true reflection of the services offered in clinics remains to be investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:互联网是一种广泛使用的健康信息来源,但网上信息的准确性可能很低。腰背痛(LBP)的情况也是如此,有关腰背痛治疗的许多信息都很不准确:本研究对内容进行了分析,以探讨澳大利亚疼痛诊所网站向公众介绍了哪些治疗腰背痛的方法,这些诊所已被列入《澳大利亚国家疼痛服务目录》(PainAustralia National Pain Services Directory)。这些网站提供了与腰椎间盘突出症治疗相关的信息。结果:结果:总共收录了 173 家疼痛服务机构,这些机构与 100 个独特的网站建立了链接。这些服务机构主要为私人所有,位于城市地区,非城市地区的服务机构有限。网站提供了中位数为六种(IQR 3-8)治疗方法的详细信息,私营服务机构提供的治疗方法更多。大多数疼痛服务机构都提供物理、心理和教育治疗,而提供手术和以工作场所为重点的治疗的服务机构则相对较少。大多数服务机构都提供了多学科治疗的详细信息;然而,以病例会议为特征的跨学科协调治疗却很少被提及:结论:大多数网站提供的治疗详情与建议的腰椎间盘突出症治疗方法基本一致,但也有一些不一致,尤其是在私人诊所。然而,网上提供的信息是否真实反映了诊所提供的服务仍有待调查。
A content analysis of the interventions for low back pain promoted on the websites of Australian pain clinics.
Background: The Internet is a widely used source of health information, yet the accuracy of online information can be low. This is the case for low back pain (LBP), where much of the information about LBP treatment is poor.
Methods: This research conducted a content analysis to explore what pain treatments for LBP are presented to the public on websites of Australian pain clinics listed in the PainAustralia National Pain Services Directory. Websites providing information relevant to the treatment of LBP were included. Details of the treatments for LBP offered by each pain service were extracted.
Results: In total, 173 pain services were included, with these services linking to 100 unique websites. Services were predominantly under private ownership and located in urban areas, with limited services in non-urban locations. Websites provided detail on a median of six (IQR 3-8) treatments, with detail on a higher number of treatments provided by services in the private sector. Physical, psychological and educational treatments were offered by the majority of pain services, whereas surgical and workplace-focused treatments were offered by relatively few services. Most services provided details on multidisciplinary care; however, interdisciplinary, coordinated care characterised by case-conferencing was infrequently mentioned.
Conclusions: Most websites provided details on treatments that were largely in-line with recommended care for LBP, but some were not, especially in private clinics. However, whether the information provided online is a true reflection of the services offered in clinics remains to be investigated.