多基因评分的最新进展:翻译、公平性、方法和 FAIR 工具。

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ruidong Xiang, Martin Kelemen, Yu Xu, Laura W Harris, Helen Parkinson, Michael Inouye, Samuel A Lambert
{"title":"多基因评分的最新进展:翻译、公平性、方法和 FAIR 工具。","authors":"Ruidong Xiang, Martin Kelemen, Yu Xu, Laura W Harris, Helen Parkinson, Michael Inouye, Samuel A Lambert","doi":"10.1186/s13073-024-01304-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polygenic scores (PGS) can be used for risk stratification by quantifying individuals' genetic predisposition to disease, and many potentially clinically useful applications have been proposed. Here, we review the latest potential benefits of PGS in the clinic and challenges to implementation. PGS could augment risk stratification through combined use with traditional risk factors (demographics, disease-specific risk factors, family history, etc.), to support diagnostic pathways, to predict groups with therapeutic benefits, and to increase the efficiency of clinical trials. However, there exist challenges to maximizing the clinical utility of PGS, including FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) use and standardized sharing of the genomic data needed to develop and recalculate PGS, the equitable performance of PGS across populations and ancestries, the generation of robust and reproducible PGS calculations, and the responsible communication and interpretation of results. We outline how these challenges may be overcome analytically and with more diverse data as well as highlight sustained community efforts to achieve equitable, impactful, and responsible use of PGS in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools.\",\"authors\":\"Ruidong Xiang, Martin Kelemen, Yu Xu, Laura W Harris, Helen Parkinson, Michael Inouye, Samuel A Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13073-024-01304-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Polygenic scores (PGS) can be used for risk stratification by quantifying individuals' genetic predisposition to disease, and many potentially clinically useful applications have been proposed. Here, we review the latest potential benefits of PGS in the clinic and challenges to implementation. PGS could augment risk stratification through combined use with traditional risk factors (demographics, disease-specific risk factors, family history, etc.), to support diagnostic pathways, to predict groups with therapeutic benefits, and to increase the efficiency of clinical trials. However, there exist challenges to maximizing the clinical utility of PGS, including FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) use and standardized sharing of the genomic data needed to develop and recalculate PGS, the equitable performance of PGS across populations and ancestries, the generation of robust and reproducible PGS calculations, and the responsible communication and interpretation of results. We outline how these challenges may be overcome analytically and with more diverse data as well as highlight sustained community efforts to achieve equitable, impactful, and responsible use of PGS in healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875792/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01304-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01304-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多基因评分(PGS)可通过量化个体对疾病的遗传易感性来进行风险分层,目前已提出了许多潜在的临床应用。在此,我们回顾了 PGS 在临床中的最新潜在优势以及实施过程中面临的挑战。PGS 可与传统风险因素(人口统计学、疾病特异性风险因素、家族史等)结合使用,增强风险分层,支持诊断路径,预测具有治疗效果的群体,并提高临床试验的效率。然而,要最大限度地发挥 PGS 的临床效用还存在一些挑战,包括 FAIR(可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重复使用)使用和标准化共享开发和重新计算 PGS 所需的基因组数据、PGS 在不同人群和不同血统中的公平表现、生成稳健且可重复的 PGS 计算结果以及负责任地交流和解释结果。我们概述了如何通过分析和更多样化的数据来克服这些挑战,并强调了社区为实现在医疗保健中公平、有影响力和负责任地使用 PGS 所做的不懈努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools.

Polygenic scores (PGS) can be used for risk stratification by quantifying individuals' genetic predisposition to disease, and many potentially clinically useful applications have been proposed. Here, we review the latest potential benefits of PGS in the clinic and challenges to implementation. PGS could augment risk stratification through combined use with traditional risk factors (demographics, disease-specific risk factors, family history, etc.), to support diagnostic pathways, to predict groups with therapeutic benefits, and to increase the efficiency of clinical trials. However, there exist challenges to maximizing the clinical utility of PGS, including FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) use and standardized sharing of the genomic data needed to develop and recalculate PGS, the equitable performance of PGS across populations and ancestries, the generation of robust and reproducible PGS calculations, and the responsible communication and interpretation of results. We outline how these challenges may be overcome analytically and with more diverse data as well as highlight sustained community efforts to achieve equitable, impactful, and responsible use of PGS in healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信