在择期手术患者中使用 i-gel Plus 声门上气道装置的评估:一项前瞻性国际多中心研究的中期结果

Jakub Werner, Olga Klementova, Jan Bruthans, Jaromir Macoun, Tomasz Gaszynski, Tomas Henlin, Will Donaldson, Erik Lichnovsky, Shiva Arava, Ana M Lopez, Raquel Berge, Pavel Michalek
{"title":"在择期手术患者中使用 i-gel Plus 声门上气道装置的评估:一项前瞻性国际多中心研究的中期结果","authors":"Jakub Werner, Olga Klementova, Jan Bruthans, Jaromir Macoun, Tomasz Gaszynski, Tomas Henlin, Will Donaldson, Erik Lichnovsky, Shiva Arava, Ana M Lopez, Raquel Berge, Pavel Michalek","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.16.24302948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The i-gel Plus supraglottic airway represents the next generation of the i-gel device. The aim of this international multicentre prospective cohort study was to evaluate its performance in adult patients during elective procedures in various surgical disciplines under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome of the study was the overall success rate of insertion allowing effective airway management, ventilation, and oxygenation. The secondary outcomes included perioperative performance of the device and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. The data of the first 1000 patients from our study (455 males and 545 females) are presented. These patients were mostly operated on in the supine position (83.3%) with a minority of them being in the lateral or lithotomy positions. The overall success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.1%. A significant difference between males and females was seen for the overall success rate, 97.4% vs. 99.6% (p=0.002) but not for the successful insertion on the first attempt (p=0.97) The mean oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor increasing the risk of first-attempt failure was low experience of the operator (p<0.001). The insertion of the device was rated by 80.3% as being either very easy or easy. Fibreoptic assessment through the i-gel Plus showed a full view of the vocal cords in 67.8% of patients, a partial view in 21.9% and a downfolded epiglottis in 9.4% of patients. A gastric tube was inserted in 11.2% of patients with a 99.1% success rate. Perioperative complications included desaturation below 85% in 0.6%, traces of blood on the device in 7.4%, laryngospasm in 0.5% and gastric contents inside the cuff in 0.2% of patients. There were no clinical signs of aspiration and a 0.1% incidence of bronchospasm. Severe postoperative sore throat was recorded in 1.4%, and long-term hoarse voice in 0.2% of patients. All patients with moderate and serious postoperative complaints are being followed up by phone at 3 and 6 months. The i-gel Plus seems to be an effective supraglottic airway device providing a high success rate of insertion, sufficient oropharyngeal seal pressure, and a reasonably low incidence of complications.","PeriodicalId":501303,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the i-gel Plus supraglottic airway device in elective patients: the interim results from a prospective international multicentre study\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Werner, Olga Klementova, Jan Bruthans, Jaromir Macoun, Tomasz Gaszynski, Tomas Henlin, Will Donaldson, Erik Lichnovsky, Shiva Arava, Ana M Lopez, Raquel Berge, Pavel Michalek\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.16.24302948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The i-gel Plus supraglottic airway represents the next generation of the i-gel device. The aim of this international multicentre prospective cohort study was to evaluate its performance in adult patients during elective procedures in various surgical disciplines under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome of the study was the overall success rate of insertion allowing effective airway management, ventilation, and oxygenation. The secondary outcomes included perioperative performance of the device and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. The data of the first 1000 patients from our study (455 males and 545 females) are presented. These patients were mostly operated on in the supine position (83.3%) with a minority of them being in the lateral or lithotomy positions. The overall success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.1%. A significant difference between males and females was seen for the overall success rate, 97.4% vs. 99.6% (p=0.002) but not for the successful insertion on the first attempt (p=0.97) The mean oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor increasing the risk of first-attempt failure was low experience of the operator (p<0.001). The insertion of the device was rated by 80.3% as being either very easy or easy. Fibreoptic assessment through the i-gel Plus showed a full view of the vocal cords in 67.8% of patients, a partial view in 21.9% and a downfolded epiglottis in 9.4% of patients. A gastric tube was inserted in 11.2% of patients with a 99.1% success rate. Perioperative complications included desaturation below 85% in 0.6%, traces of blood on the device in 7.4%, laryngospasm in 0.5% and gastric contents inside the cuff in 0.2% of patients. There were no clinical signs of aspiration and a 0.1% incidence of bronchospasm. Severe postoperative sore throat was recorded in 1.4%, and long-term hoarse voice in 0.2% of patients. All patients with moderate and serious postoperative complaints are being followed up by phone at 3 and 6 months. The i-gel Plus seems to be an effective supraglottic airway device providing a high success rate of insertion, sufficient oropharyngeal seal pressure, and a reasonably low incidence of complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.24302948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.16.24302948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

i-gel Plus 声门上气道是新一代 i-gel 装置。这项国际多中心前瞻性队列研究的目的是评估 i-gel Plus 在成人患者全身麻醉下进行各种外科择期手术时的性能。研究的主要结果是插入的总体成功率,从而实现有效的气道管理、通气和供氧。次要结果包括设备的围手术期表现和术后不良事件的发生率。本文介绍了我们研究的前 1000 名患者(455 名男性和 545 名女性)的数据。这些患者大多采用仰卧位进行手术(83.3%),少数采用侧卧位或截石位。总体成功率为 98.6%,首次插入成功率为 88.1%。男性和女性的总体成功率存在明显差异,分别为 97.4% 和 99.6%(P=0.002),但首次插入成功率没有差异(P=0.97)。增加首次尝试失败风险的唯一独立因素是操作者经验不足(p<0.001)。80.3%的人认为插入装置非常简单或容易。通过 i-gel Plus 进行的光纤评估显示,67.8% 的患者能看到声带全貌,21.9% 的患者能看到声带部分,9.4% 的患者会厌下垂。11.2%的患者插入了胃管,成功率为99.1%。围手术期并发症包括:0.6% 的患者饱和度低于 85%,7.4% 的患者装置上有血迹,0.5% 的患者出现喉痉挛,0.2% 的患者袖带内有胃内容物。没有吸入的临床症状,支气管痉挛发生率为 0.1%。1.4% 的患者在术后出现严重咽喉痛,0.2% 的患者出现长期声音嘶哑。所有有中度和严重术后不适症状的患者都将在 3 个月和 6 个月后接受电话随访。i-gel Plus 似乎是一种有效的声门上气道装置,插入成功率高,口咽密封压力足够,并发症发生率相当低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of the i-gel Plus supraglottic airway device in elective patients: the interim results from a prospective international multicentre study
The i-gel Plus supraglottic airway represents the next generation of the i-gel device. The aim of this international multicentre prospective cohort study was to evaluate its performance in adult patients during elective procedures in various surgical disciplines under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome of the study was the overall success rate of insertion allowing effective airway management, ventilation, and oxygenation. The secondary outcomes included perioperative performance of the device and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. The data of the first 1000 patients from our study (455 males and 545 females) are presented. These patients were mostly operated on in the supine position (83.3%) with a minority of them being in the lateral or lithotomy positions. The overall success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.1%. A significant difference between males and females was seen for the overall success rate, 97.4% vs. 99.6% (p=0.002) but not for the successful insertion on the first attempt (p=0.97) The mean oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor increasing the risk of first-attempt failure was low experience of the operator (p<0.001). The insertion of the device was rated by 80.3% as being either very easy or easy. Fibreoptic assessment through the i-gel Plus showed a full view of the vocal cords in 67.8% of patients, a partial view in 21.9% and a downfolded epiglottis in 9.4% of patients. A gastric tube was inserted in 11.2% of patients with a 99.1% success rate. Perioperative complications included desaturation below 85% in 0.6%, traces of blood on the device in 7.4%, laryngospasm in 0.5% and gastric contents inside the cuff in 0.2% of patients. There were no clinical signs of aspiration and a 0.1% incidence of bronchospasm. Severe postoperative sore throat was recorded in 1.4%, and long-term hoarse voice in 0.2% of patients. All patients with moderate and serious postoperative complaints are being followed up by phone at 3 and 6 months. The i-gel Plus seems to be an effective supraglottic airway device providing a high success rate of insertion, sufficient oropharyngeal seal pressure, and a reasonably low incidence of complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信