Ryan M. Aronson, Nicola Castelletto, François P. Hamon, J. A. White, Hamdi A. Tchelepi
{"title":"成分孔力学的压力稳定定应力迭代解法","authors":"Ryan M. Aronson, Nicola Castelletto, François P. Hamon, J. A. White, Hamdi A. Tchelepi","doi":"arxiv-2402.10469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the numerical behavior of the fixed-stress splitting method for\ncoupled poromechanics as undrained regimes are approached. We explain that\npressure stability is related to the splitting error of the scheme, not the\nfact that the discrete saddle point matrix never appears in the fixed-stress\napproach. This observation reconciles previous results regarding the pressure\nstability of the splitting method. Using examples of compositional\nporomechanics with application to geological CO$_2$ sequestration, we see that\nsolutions obtained using the fixed-stress scheme with a low order finite\nelement-finite volume discretization which is not inherently inf-sup stable can\nexhibit the same pressure oscillations obtained with the corresponding fully\nimplicit scheme. Moreover, pressure jump stabilization can effectively remove\nthese spurious oscillations in the fixed-stress setting, while also improving\nthe efficiency of the scheme in terms of the number of iterations required at\nevery time step to reach convergence.","PeriodicalId":501061,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Numerical Analysis","volume":"186 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure-stabilized fixed-stress iterative solutions of compositional poromechanics\",\"authors\":\"Ryan M. Aronson, Nicola Castelletto, François P. Hamon, J. A. White, Hamdi A. Tchelepi\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2402.10469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the numerical behavior of the fixed-stress splitting method for\\ncoupled poromechanics as undrained regimes are approached. We explain that\\npressure stability is related to the splitting error of the scheme, not the\\nfact that the discrete saddle point matrix never appears in the fixed-stress\\napproach. This observation reconciles previous results regarding the pressure\\nstability of the splitting method. Using examples of compositional\\nporomechanics with application to geological CO$_2$ sequestration, we see that\\nsolutions obtained using the fixed-stress scheme with a low order finite\\nelement-finite volume discretization which is not inherently inf-sup stable can\\nexhibit the same pressure oscillations obtained with the corresponding fully\\nimplicit scheme. Moreover, pressure jump stabilization can effectively remove\\nthese spurious oscillations in the fixed-stress setting, while also improving\\nthe efficiency of the scheme in terms of the number of iterations required at\\nevery time step to reach convergence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Numerical Analysis\",\"volume\":\"186 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Numerical Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2402.10469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Numerical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2402.10469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pressure-stabilized fixed-stress iterative solutions of compositional poromechanics
We consider the numerical behavior of the fixed-stress splitting method for
coupled poromechanics as undrained regimes are approached. We explain that
pressure stability is related to the splitting error of the scheme, not the
fact that the discrete saddle point matrix never appears in the fixed-stress
approach. This observation reconciles previous results regarding the pressure
stability of the splitting method. Using examples of compositional
poromechanics with application to geological CO$_2$ sequestration, we see that
solutions obtained using the fixed-stress scheme with a low order finite
element-finite volume discretization which is not inherently inf-sup stable can
exhibit the same pressure oscillations obtained with the corresponding fully
implicit scheme. Moreover, pressure jump stabilization can effectively remove
these spurious oscillations in the fixed-stress setting, while also improving
the efficiency of the scheme in terms of the number of iterations required at
every time step to reach convergence.