通过四维血流磁共振成像分析法洛四联症修复后右室流出道的血流模式。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart and Vessels Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s00380-024-02361-1
Noriyuki Iwashita, Shigeo Okuda, Jun Maeda, Hiroyuki Yamagishi
{"title":"通过四维血流磁共振成像分析法洛四联症修复后右室流出道的血流模式。","authors":"Noriyuki Iwashita, Shigeo Okuda, Jun Maeda, Hiroyuki Yamagishi","doi":"10.1007/s00380-024-02361-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) often shows discrepancies between right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) flow and left ventricular outflow tract flow in patients with late-stage repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF), leading to potential errors in pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) assessment. This study aimed to identify the conditions under which RVOT flow can be acutely evaluated using four-dimensional (4D) flow CMR. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with rTOF underwent both two-dimensional phase-contrast (2D PC) and 4D flow CMR between 2016 and 2018, excluding those with peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis, RVOT conduit replacement, unknown surgical method, and an aortic valve regurgitation greater than 20%. Seven healthy controls also underwent only 4D Flow CMR. All healthy controls and fifteen patients with rTOF showed laminar RVOT flow, while seven patients exhibited helical, and four patients exhibited vortical RVOT flow in 4D flow CMR visualization. Flow-volume concordance between the pulmonary artery and aortic flow was significantly lower in patients with rTOF and PRF > 40% in 2D PC CMR. This concordance rate in the suprapulmonary valve was high in both the TOF and control groups, comparing at five RVOT locations in 4D flow CMR. Regarding RVOT flow regurgitation in 4D flow, the whole bulk evaluation exhibited greater variation depending on the flow type compared to the whole pixel-wise evaluation. The study confirmed the flow volume at the upper section of the pulmonary valve as the most accurate correlate of aortic flow volume. Furthermore, the 4D flow CMR using the pixel-wise method demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the traditional bulk flow method.</p>","PeriodicalId":12940,"journal":{"name":"Heart and Vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow pattern analysis of right ventricular outflow tract in repaired tetralogy of Fallot through 4D flow MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Noriyuki Iwashita, Shigeo Okuda, Jun Maeda, Hiroyuki Yamagishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00380-024-02361-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) often shows discrepancies between right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) flow and left ventricular outflow tract flow in patients with late-stage repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF), leading to potential errors in pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) assessment. This study aimed to identify the conditions under which RVOT flow can be acutely evaluated using four-dimensional (4D) flow CMR. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with rTOF underwent both two-dimensional phase-contrast (2D PC) and 4D flow CMR between 2016 and 2018, excluding those with peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis, RVOT conduit replacement, unknown surgical method, and an aortic valve regurgitation greater than 20%. Seven healthy controls also underwent only 4D Flow CMR. All healthy controls and fifteen patients with rTOF showed laminar RVOT flow, while seven patients exhibited helical, and four patients exhibited vortical RVOT flow in 4D flow CMR visualization. Flow-volume concordance between the pulmonary artery and aortic flow was significantly lower in patients with rTOF and PRF > 40% in 2D PC CMR. This concordance rate in the suprapulmonary valve was high in both the TOF and control groups, comparing at five RVOT locations in 4D flow CMR. Regarding RVOT flow regurgitation in 4D flow, the whole bulk evaluation exhibited greater variation depending on the flow type compared to the whole pixel-wise evaluation. The study confirmed the flow volume at the upper section of the pulmonary valve as the most accurate correlate of aortic flow volume. Furthermore, the 4D flow CMR using the pixel-wise method demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the traditional bulk flow method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart and Vessels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02361-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart and Vessels","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02361-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法洛氏四联症(rTOF)晚期修复患者中,心脏磁共振成像(CMR)经常会显示右室流出道(RVOT)血流与左室流出道血流之间存在差异,从而导致肺动脉反流分数(PRF)评估的潜在误差。本研究旨在确定使用四维(4D)血流 CMR 快速评估 RVOT 血流的条件。2016年至2018年期间,27名连续的rTOF患者同时接受了二维相位对比(2D PC)和四维血流CMR检查,排除了外周肺动脉狭窄、RVOT导管置换、手术方法不明以及主动脉瓣反流大于20%的患者。7 名健康对照者也只接受了 4D 流量 CMR 检查。在四维血流 CMR 图像中,所有健康对照组和 15 名 rTOF 患者的 RVOT 血流均呈层状,而 7 名患者的 RVOT 血流呈螺旋状,4 名患者的 RVOT 血流呈涡状。在二维 PC CMR 中,rTOF 和 PRF > 40% 患者的肺动脉和主动脉血流的血流-血容量一致性明显较低。在四维血流 CMR 中,比较五个 RVOT 位置,TOF 组和对照组的肺动脉瓣上血流一致性都很高。关于四维血流中的 RVOT 血流反流,与像素整体评价相比,整体评价因血流类型的不同而表现出更大的差异。研究证实,肺动脉瓣上段的血流量与主动脉血流量的相关性最为准确。此外,与传统的整体流量法相比,使用像素法的 4D 流量 CMR 表现出更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Flow pattern analysis of right ventricular outflow tract in repaired tetralogy of Fallot through 4D flow MRI.

Flow pattern analysis of right ventricular outflow tract in repaired tetralogy of Fallot through 4D flow MRI.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) often shows discrepancies between right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) flow and left ventricular outflow tract flow in patients with late-stage repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF), leading to potential errors in pulmonary regurgitation fraction (PRF) assessment. This study aimed to identify the conditions under which RVOT flow can be acutely evaluated using four-dimensional (4D) flow CMR. Twenty-seven consecutive patients with rTOF underwent both two-dimensional phase-contrast (2D PC) and 4D flow CMR between 2016 and 2018, excluding those with peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis, RVOT conduit replacement, unknown surgical method, and an aortic valve regurgitation greater than 20%. Seven healthy controls also underwent only 4D Flow CMR. All healthy controls and fifteen patients with rTOF showed laminar RVOT flow, while seven patients exhibited helical, and four patients exhibited vortical RVOT flow in 4D flow CMR visualization. Flow-volume concordance between the pulmonary artery and aortic flow was significantly lower in patients with rTOF and PRF > 40% in 2D PC CMR. This concordance rate in the suprapulmonary valve was high in both the TOF and control groups, comparing at five RVOT locations in 4D flow CMR. Regarding RVOT flow regurgitation in 4D flow, the whole bulk evaluation exhibited greater variation depending on the flow type compared to the whole pixel-wise evaluation. The study confirmed the flow volume at the upper section of the pulmonary valve as the most accurate correlate of aortic flow volume. Furthermore, the 4D flow CMR using the pixel-wise method demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the traditional bulk flow method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart and Vessels
Heart and Vessels 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
211
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Heart and Vessels is an English-language journal that provides a forum of original ideas, excellent methods, and fascinating techniques on cardiovascular disease fields. All papers submitted for publication are evaluated only with regard to scientific quality and relevance to the heart and vessels. Contributions from those engaged in practical medicine, as well as from those involved in basic research, are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信