我们从有关教师激励和教育质量的影响评估研究中学到了什么?

Jin Chi, Eduardo Velez Bustillo
{"title":"我们从有关教师激励和教育质量的影响评估研究中学到了什么?","authors":"Jin Chi, Eduardo Velez Bustillo","doi":"10.56395/recap.v1i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of teachers is a determinant to the quality of the education system. Despite the significant increase in resources invested in teacher incentives, there is little robust empirical evidence on their effectiveness, especially showing attribution. This paper examines the international literature using Impact Evaluation (IE) studies to see what lessons can be learned, focusing specifically on a key education input: teacher incentives as a policy to motivate teachers and improve education quality in middle- and low-income developing countries. The review shows there are limited number of IE studies on teacher incentives at the preschool, primary and secondary education levels applying robust experimental design and the results are mixed. When incentives are used properly they can have a positive impact on the quality of education.  However, certification itself is not enough as a way to improve the quality of the education system; it is critical to develop reforms explicitly geared towards quality. Finally, although incentives can reduce teacher absenteeism, they do not always improve the quality of education outcomes.","PeriodicalId":517293,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education Curriculum and Pedagogy: Global Perspectives","volume":"61 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Are We Learning from Impact Evaluation Studies about Teacher Incentives and Education Quality\",\"authors\":\"Jin Chi, Eduardo Velez Bustillo\",\"doi\":\"10.56395/recap.v1i1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quality of teachers is a determinant to the quality of the education system. Despite the significant increase in resources invested in teacher incentives, there is little robust empirical evidence on their effectiveness, especially showing attribution. This paper examines the international literature using Impact Evaluation (IE) studies to see what lessons can be learned, focusing specifically on a key education input: teacher incentives as a policy to motivate teachers and improve education quality in middle- and low-income developing countries. The review shows there are limited number of IE studies on teacher incentives at the preschool, primary and secondary education levels applying robust experimental design and the results are mixed. When incentives are used properly they can have a positive impact on the quality of education.  However, certification itself is not enough as a way to improve the quality of the education system; it is critical to develop reforms explicitly geared towards quality. Finally, although incentives can reduce teacher absenteeism, they do not always improve the quality of education outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Education Curriculum and Pedagogy: Global Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"61 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Education Curriculum and Pedagogy: Global Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56395/recap.v1i1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education Curriculum and Pedagogy: Global Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56395/recap.v1i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师质量是教育系统质量的决定因素。尽管在教师激励机制方面投入的资源大幅增加,但有关其有效性的有力实证证据却很少,特别是在归因方面。本文利用影响评估(IE)研究对国际文献进行了审查,以了解可以汲取哪些经验教 训,并特别关注一项关键的教育投入:教师激励措施,作为激励教师和提高中低收入发 展中国家教育质量的一项政策。审查结果表明,在学前教育、初等教育和中等教育层面,采用可靠的实验设计对教师激励措施进行的国际影响评价研究数量有限,而且结果好坏参半。如果激励措施使用得当,会对教育质量产生积极影响。 然而,仅凭证书本身还不足以提高教育系统的质量;关键是要制定明确针对质量的改革措施。最后,尽管激励措施可以减少教师缺勤现象,但并不总能提高教育成果的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Are We Learning from Impact Evaluation Studies about Teacher Incentives and Education Quality
The quality of teachers is a determinant to the quality of the education system. Despite the significant increase in resources invested in teacher incentives, there is little robust empirical evidence on their effectiveness, especially showing attribution. This paper examines the international literature using Impact Evaluation (IE) studies to see what lessons can be learned, focusing specifically on a key education input: teacher incentives as a policy to motivate teachers and improve education quality in middle- and low-income developing countries. The review shows there are limited number of IE studies on teacher incentives at the preschool, primary and secondary education levels applying robust experimental design and the results are mixed. When incentives are used properly they can have a positive impact on the quality of education.  However, certification itself is not enough as a way to improve the quality of the education system; it is critical to develop reforms explicitly geared towards quality. Finally, although incentives can reduce teacher absenteeism, they do not always improve the quality of education outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信