波兰医生对复方药物的看法及其处方频率的相关因素

Piotr Guzy, Andrzej Porębski, Sławomir Łudzik, Natalia Obajtek, Anna Gołda
{"title":"波兰医生对复方药物的看法及其处方频率的相关因素","authors":"Piotr Guzy, Andrzej Porębski, Sławomir Łudzik, Natalia Obajtek, Anna Gołda","doi":"10.32383/appdr/178181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to verify if there is a relationship between physicians' specialization, place of practice, or views on issues related to compounded medicines and the frequency of prescribing such formulations. Additionally, the study aimed to determine the factors that influence these views. The study also examined the barriers and encouragements, according to physicians, in the use of compounded medicines. The original questionnaire was developed specifically for this study. Included sample consisted of Polish-speaking physicians whose main specialization was gynaecology, gastroenterology, dermatology, family medicine, internal medicine, otorhinolaryngology, paediatric otorhinolaryngology, paediatrics. Answers were gathered using computer-assisted telephone interview. The majority of surveyed physicians believed that every Polish patient receives treatment tailored to their personal needs (68,7%) and agreed that compounded medicines are a way to facilitate individualization of pharmacotherapy (79,3%). Frequency of prescribing of magistral formulations, as well as views on quality of compounded medicines, ease of prescribing, and filling a prescription vary between specializations and places of practice. The problem that negatively affects the practice of the largest group of respondents was complicated and frequently changing legal regulations (63.3%), while the least frequently indicated problems were concerns about the quality of preparation (16.7%). Based on opinion of surveyed physicians, a simplification of the regulations for prescribing and liberalization of reimbursement rules are main changes to consider in order to improve clinical practice in the areas where it relates to the prescription of compounded medicines.","PeriodicalId":7135,"journal":{"name":"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polish physicians' views on compounded medicines and factors related to the frequency of their prescription\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Guzy, Andrzej Porębski, Sławomir Łudzik, Natalia Obajtek, Anna Gołda\",\"doi\":\"10.32383/appdr/178181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to verify if there is a relationship between physicians' specialization, place of practice, or views on issues related to compounded medicines and the frequency of prescribing such formulations. Additionally, the study aimed to determine the factors that influence these views. The study also examined the barriers and encouragements, according to physicians, in the use of compounded medicines. The original questionnaire was developed specifically for this study. Included sample consisted of Polish-speaking physicians whose main specialization was gynaecology, gastroenterology, dermatology, family medicine, internal medicine, otorhinolaryngology, paediatric otorhinolaryngology, paediatrics. Answers were gathered using computer-assisted telephone interview. The majority of surveyed physicians believed that every Polish patient receives treatment tailored to their personal needs (68,7%) and agreed that compounded medicines are a way to facilitate individualization of pharmacotherapy (79,3%). Frequency of prescribing of magistral formulations, as well as views on quality of compounded medicines, ease of prescribing, and filling a prescription vary between specializations and places of practice. The problem that negatively affects the practice of the largest group of respondents was complicated and frequently changing legal regulations (63.3%), while the least frequently indicated problems were concerns about the quality of preparation (16.7%). Based on opinion of surveyed physicians, a simplification of the regulations for prescribing and liberalization of reimbursement rules are main changes to consider in order to improve clinical practice in the areas where it relates to the prescription of compounded medicines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32383/appdr/178181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32383/appdr/178181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在验证医生的专业、执业地点或对复方制剂相关问题的看法与开具此类制剂处方的频率之间是否存在关系。此外,研究还旨在确定影响这些观点的因素。研究还调查了医生在使用复方制剂时遇到的障碍和鼓励措施。原始调查问卷是专为本研究编制的。样本包括讲波兰语的医生,他们的主要专业是妇科、消化科、皮肤科、家庭医学、内科、耳鼻喉科、儿童耳鼻喉科和儿科。答案是通过计算机辅助电话采访收集的。大多数受访医生认为,每个波兰病人都能得到符合其个人需求的治疗(68.7%),并同意复方药物是促进药物治疗个性化的一种方式(79.3%)。不同专业和执业地点的医生开具复方制剂处方的频率以及对复方药物质量、开具处方的难易程度和填写处方的看法各不相同。对最多受访者的执业产生负面影响的问题是复杂多变的法律法规(63.3%),而最不常见的问题是对制剂质量的担忧(16.7%)。根据受访医生的意见,为改善复方药物处方领域的临床实践,应考虑简化处方法规和放宽报销规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polish physicians' views on compounded medicines and factors related to the frequency of their prescription
The aim of this study was to verify if there is a relationship between physicians' specialization, place of practice, or views on issues related to compounded medicines and the frequency of prescribing such formulations. Additionally, the study aimed to determine the factors that influence these views. The study also examined the barriers and encouragements, according to physicians, in the use of compounded medicines. The original questionnaire was developed specifically for this study. Included sample consisted of Polish-speaking physicians whose main specialization was gynaecology, gastroenterology, dermatology, family medicine, internal medicine, otorhinolaryngology, paediatric otorhinolaryngology, paediatrics. Answers were gathered using computer-assisted telephone interview. The majority of surveyed physicians believed that every Polish patient receives treatment tailored to their personal needs (68,7%) and agreed that compounded medicines are a way to facilitate individualization of pharmacotherapy (79,3%). Frequency of prescribing of magistral formulations, as well as views on quality of compounded medicines, ease of prescribing, and filling a prescription vary between specializations and places of practice. The problem that negatively affects the practice of the largest group of respondents was complicated and frequently changing legal regulations (63.3%), while the least frequently indicated problems were concerns about the quality of preparation (16.7%). Based on opinion of surveyed physicians, a simplification of the regulations for prescribing and liberalization of reimbursement rules are main changes to consider in order to improve clinical practice in the areas where it relates to the prescription of compounded medicines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信