Claire Blewitt , Heather Morris , Yihan Sun , Michelle Gooey , Hannah Kirk , Heidi Bergmeier , Helen Skouteris
{"title":"社会和情感学习干预会影响生理和生物指标吗?关于学前班至 12 年级通用和定向计划的系统性文献综述","authors":"Claire Blewitt , Heather Morris , Yihan Sun , Michelle Gooey , Hannah Kirk , Heidi Bergmeier , Helen Skouteris","doi":"10.1016/j.sel.2024.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effectiveness of Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programs on child outcomes has been firmly established through student self-reporting, teacher and caregiver questionnaires, and direct assessment via performance tasks. Exploring the extent to which SEL programs can influence physiological and biological indicators may enable evaluators to shift beyond measuring what is subjectively observed or experienced, to understanding what is happening within the body, offering a valuable and objective measure of program efficacy. This systematic literature review of controlled studies examined how biological and physiological indicators have been incorporated into SEL research from Pre-K to Grade 12, the association between SEL intervention and physiological and biological indicators, and the challenges and opportunities when collecting and using these data. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, capturing a range of neurological, hormonal, and autonomic outcomes. Our review found preliminary evidence that SEL programs may influence students’ cortisol, cardiovascular reactivity, and brain functioning, potentially linked to an underlying reduction in stress. It offers an initial step towards deepening understanding of the connections between social-emotional health, physical health, and well-being.</p><p><strong>Impact statement</strong></p><p>Our understanding of how social and emotional learning programs benefit students is largely based on performance tasks and student, teacher and caregiver perspectives captured through questionnaires. Moving beyond what is subjectively observed or experienced to understanding what is happening within the body may uncover new insights into program impact. This systematic literature review captures 14 studies that explore the relationships between social and emotional learning programs and physiological and biological indicators in children from pre-K to Grade 12. It offers an initial step towards improving knowledge of the connections between social-emotional competence, physical health, and wellbeing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101165,"journal":{"name":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773233924000020/pdfft?md5=a506403a4a5a286f814cde5935fde8f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2773233924000020-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does social and emotional learning intervention influence physiological and biological indicators? A systematic literature review of universal and targeted programs in Pre-K to grade 12\",\"authors\":\"Claire Blewitt , Heather Morris , Yihan Sun , Michelle Gooey , Hannah Kirk , Heidi Bergmeier , Helen Skouteris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sel.2024.100028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effectiveness of Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programs on child outcomes has been firmly established through student self-reporting, teacher and caregiver questionnaires, and direct assessment via performance tasks. Exploring the extent to which SEL programs can influence physiological and biological indicators may enable evaluators to shift beyond measuring what is subjectively observed or experienced, to understanding what is happening within the body, offering a valuable and objective measure of program efficacy. This systematic literature review of controlled studies examined how biological and physiological indicators have been incorporated into SEL research from Pre-K to Grade 12, the association between SEL intervention and physiological and biological indicators, and the challenges and opportunities when collecting and using these data. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, capturing a range of neurological, hormonal, and autonomic outcomes. Our review found preliminary evidence that SEL programs may influence students’ cortisol, cardiovascular reactivity, and brain functioning, potentially linked to an underlying reduction in stress. It offers an initial step towards deepening understanding of the connections between social-emotional health, physical health, and well-being.</p><p><strong>Impact statement</strong></p><p>Our understanding of how social and emotional learning programs benefit students is largely based on performance tasks and student, teacher and caregiver perspectives captured through questionnaires. Moving beyond what is subjectively observed or experienced to understanding what is happening within the body may uncover new insights into program impact. This systematic literature review captures 14 studies that explore the relationships between social and emotional learning programs and physiological and biological indicators in children from pre-K to Grade 12. It offers an initial step towards improving knowledge of the connections between social-emotional competence, physical health, and wellbeing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773233924000020/pdfft?md5=a506403a4a5a286f814cde5935fde8f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2773233924000020-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773233924000020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773233924000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
通过学生的自我报告、教师和照顾者的问卷调查,以及通过表现任务进行的直接评估,社会和情感学习(SEL)计划对儿童成果的有效性已经得到了牢固确立。探索 SEL 项目在多大程度上能够影响生理和生物指标,可以使评估者从测量主观观察或体验到的东西,转变为了解身体内部发生了什么,从而为项目成效提供有价值的客观衡量标准。本系统性文献综述研究了如何将生物和生理指标纳入从学前班到十二年级的 SEL 研究、SEL 干预与生理和生物指标之间的关联,以及在收集和使用这些数据时所面临的挑战和机遇。14 项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖了一系列神经、荷尔蒙和自律神经方面的结果。我们的综述发现,有初步证据表明,SEL 计划可能会影响学生的皮质醇、心血管反应和大脑功能,这可能与潜在的压力减轻有关。影响声明我们对社交与情感学习项目如何使学生受益的理解主要基于表现任务以及通过问卷调查获得的学生、教师和照顾者的观点。超越主观观察或体验,了解身体内部发生了什么,可能会对计划的影响有新的认识。本系统性文献综述收录了 14 项研究,探讨了社会和情感学习计划与学前班至 12 年级儿童的生理和生物指标之间的关系。它为增进对社交情感能力、身体健康和幸福之间联系的了解迈出了第一步。
Does social and emotional learning intervention influence physiological and biological indicators? A systematic literature review of universal and targeted programs in Pre-K to grade 12
The effectiveness of Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programs on child outcomes has been firmly established through student self-reporting, teacher and caregiver questionnaires, and direct assessment via performance tasks. Exploring the extent to which SEL programs can influence physiological and biological indicators may enable evaluators to shift beyond measuring what is subjectively observed or experienced, to understanding what is happening within the body, offering a valuable and objective measure of program efficacy. This systematic literature review of controlled studies examined how biological and physiological indicators have been incorporated into SEL research from Pre-K to Grade 12, the association between SEL intervention and physiological and biological indicators, and the challenges and opportunities when collecting and using these data. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, capturing a range of neurological, hormonal, and autonomic outcomes. Our review found preliminary evidence that SEL programs may influence students’ cortisol, cardiovascular reactivity, and brain functioning, potentially linked to an underlying reduction in stress. It offers an initial step towards deepening understanding of the connections between social-emotional health, physical health, and well-being.
Impact statement
Our understanding of how social and emotional learning programs benefit students is largely based on performance tasks and student, teacher and caregiver perspectives captured through questionnaires. Moving beyond what is subjectively observed or experienced to understanding what is happening within the body may uncover new insights into program impact. This systematic literature review captures 14 studies that explore the relationships between social and emotional learning programs and physiological and biological indicators in children from pre-K to Grade 12. It offers an initial step towards improving knowledge of the connections between social-emotional competence, physical health, and wellbeing.