{"title":"全球相似,地方相异?- 居住在马拉维湖、奥赫里德湖和贝加尔湖中的小型底栖无脊椎动物群落比较","authors":"Benjamin Wilden, Nabil Majdi, Walter Traunspurger","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ancient lakes are known as biodiversity hotspots and provide unique opportunities to study diversity patterns. We compared the distribution and community characteristics of the meiofauna in the littoral (soft-substrate and hard substrates) and profundal (soft-substrate) of three ancient lakes situated in three different continents: Lake Baikal (Asia), Lake Ohrid (Europe), and Lake Malawi (Africa). We expected that, for microscopic creatures like meiofauna, community structure would be more influenced by local habitat features than by spatial distances between lakes. This was found for the deep profundal, a unique system not showing differences in meiofaunal abundance (about 500,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (about 100 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>) across the lakes. But littoral communities differed across lakes in abundance (up to 7,000,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (on average 400 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>The community structure was found to change significantly across the lakes and habitats, with distinct differences between profundal and littoral communities. Chironomids, copepods, and tardigrades were typical representatives of littoral communities, while nematodes dominated the profundal communities with >80 % of the individuals. Rotifers made up more than 50 % of the littoral hard substrate communities, while ostracods were more dominant in Lake Baikal. Abundance-biomass regressions of nematodes indicated significantly different trophic transfer efficiency and carrying capacity between profundal and littoral habitats, but no differences across the lakes. Nevertheless, this first comparative study of meiofauna in three ancient lakes revealed the need for more thorough investigations for a better understanding of these systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"50 3","pages":"Article 102305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327/pdfft?md5=09f21edb9c94d8ee16f97a43295c47ed&pid=1-s2.0-S0380133024000327-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global resemblance, local divergence? – A comparison of meiobenthic invertebrate communities dwelling in ancient lakes Malawi, Ohrid and Baikal\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Wilden, Nabil Majdi, Walter Traunspurger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ancient lakes are known as biodiversity hotspots and provide unique opportunities to study diversity patterns. We compared the distribution and community characteristics of the meiofauna in the littoral (soft-substrate and hard substrates) and profundal (soft-substrate) of three ancient lakes situated in three different continents: Lake Baikal (Asia), Lake Ohrid (Europe), and Lake Malawi (Africa). We expected that, for microscopic creatures like meiofauna, community structure would be more influenced by local habitat features than by spatial distances between lakes. This was found for the deep profundal, a unique system not showing differences in meiofaunal abundance (about 500,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (about 100 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>) across the lakes. But littoral communities differed across lakes in abundance (up to 7,000,000 ind. per m<sup>2</sup>) and biomass (on average 400 mg dry weight per m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>The community structure was found to change significantly across the lakes and habitats, with distinct differences between profundal and littoral communities. Chironomids, copepods, and tardigrades were typical representatives of littoral communities, while nematodes dominated the profundal communities with >80 % of the individuals. Rotifers made up more than 50 % of the littoral hard substrate communities, while ostracods were more dominant in Lake Baikal. Abundance-biomass regressions of nematodes indicated significantly different trophic transfer efficiency and carrying capacity between profundal and littoral habitats, but no differences across the lakes. Nevertheless, this first comparative study of meiofauna in three ancient lakes revealed the need for more thorough investigations for a better understanding of these systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"volume\":\"50 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 102305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327/pdfft?md5=09f21edb9c94d8ee16f97a43295c47ed&pid=1-s2.0-S0380133024000327-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global resemblance, local divergence? – A comparison of meiobenthic invertebrate communities dwelling in ancient lakes Malawi, Ohrid and Baikal
Ancient lakes are known as biodiversity hotspots and provide unique opportunities to study diversity patterns. We compared the distribution and community characteristics of the meiofauna in the littoral (soft-substrate and hard substrates) and profundal (soft-substrate) of three ancient lakes situated in three different continents: Lake Baikal (Asia), Lake Ohrid (Europe), and Lake Malawi (Africa). We expected that, for microscopic creatures like meiofauna, community structure would be more influenced by local habitat features than by spatial distances between lakes. This was found for the deep profundal, a unique system not showing differences in meiofaunal abundance (about 500,000 ind. per m2) and biomass (about 100 mg dry weight per m2) across the lakes. But littoral communities differed across lakes in abundance (up to 7,000,000 ind. per m2) and biomass (on average 400 mg dry weight per m2).
The community structure was found to change significantly across the lakes and habitats, with distinct differences between profundal and littoral communities. Chironomids, copepods, and tardigrades were typical representatives of littoral communities, while nematodes dominated the profundal communities with >80 % of the individuals. Rotifers made up more than 50 % of the littoral hard substrate communities, while ostracods were more dominant in Lake Baikal. Abundance-biomass regressions of nematodes indicated significantly different trophic transfer efficiency and carrying capacity between profundal and littoral habitats, but no differences across the lakes. Nevertheless, this first comparative study of meiofauna in three ancient lakes revealed the need for more thorough investigations for a better understanding of these systems.
期刊介绍:
Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.