{"title":"绘画任务中学生与人工智能交互过程的差异:关注学生对人工智能的态度和绘画技能水平","authors":"Jinhee Kim, Yoonhee Ham, Sang-Soog Lee","doi":"10.14742/ajet.8859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) have increased the opportunities for students to interact with AI in their learning tasks. Although various fields of scholarly research have investigated human-AI collaboration, the underlying processes of how students collaborate with AI in a student-AI teaming scenario have been scarcely investigated. To develop effective AI applications in education, it is necessary to understand differences in the student-AI interaction (SAI) process depending on students' characteristics. The present study attempts to fill this gap by exploring the differences in the SAI process amongst students with varying drawing proficiencies and attitudes towards AI in performing a public advertisement drawing task. Based on the empirical evidence obtained from the think-aloud protocols of 20 Korean undergraduate students, the study first conducted a lag sequential analysis to identify statistically significant linear patterns of each group and then chronologically incorporated them into the SAI duration via coded activity alignment series to distinguish the overall SAI process of each group. The study revealed the distinctive differences in SAI processes of students with different attitudes towards AI and drawing skills. To better facilitate student-AI teams for learning, a range of implications of educational AI development and instructional design is discussed.\n \nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nEducational AI should not be limited to performing a specific task and solving well-defined problems. It should be designed with a holistic view of the end-to-end student-AI process, interconnected to different learning activities in the learning process.\nEducational AI should be capable of increasing students’ metacognition and emotional engagement.\nAn educational AI system architect team inclusive of diverse stakeholders should be formed to collaboratively design the AI system.\n","PeriodicalId":502572,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in student-AI interaction process on a drawing task: Focusing on students’ attitude towards AI and the level of drawing skills\",\"authors\":\"Jinhee Kim, Yoonhee Ham, Sang-Soog Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/ajet.8859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent advances and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) have increased the opportunities for students to interact with AI in their learning tasks. Although various fields of scholarly research have investigated human-AI collaboration, the underlying processes of how students collaborate with AI in a student-AI teaming scenario have been scarcely investigated. To develop effective AI applications in education, it is necessary to understand differences in the student-AI interaction (SAI) process depending on students' characteristics. The present study attempts to fill this gap by exploring the differences in the SAI process amongst students with varying drawing proficiencies and attitudes towards AI in performing a public advertisement drawing task. Based on the empirical evidence obtained from the think-aloud protocols of 20 Korean undergraduate students, the study first conducted a lag sequential analysis to identify statistically significant linear patterns of each group and then chronologically incorporated them into the SAI duration via coded activity alignment series to distinguish the overall SAI process of each group. The study revealed the distinctive differences in SAI processes of students with different attitudes towards AI and drawing skills. To better facilitate student-AI teams for learning, a range of implications of educational AI development and instructional design is discussed.\\n \\nImplications for practice or policy:\\n\\nEducational AI should not be limited to performing a specific task and solving well-defined problems. It should be designed with a holistic view of the end-to-end student-AI process, interconnected to different learning activities in the learning process.\\nEducational AI should be capable of increasing students’ metacognition and emotional engagement.\\nAn educational AI system architect team inclusive of diverse stakeholders should be formed to collaboratively design the AI system.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":502572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人工智能(AI)的最新进展和应用增加了学生在学习任务中与人工智能互动的机会。虽然学术研究的各个领域都对人与人工智能的协作进行了调查,但对学生与人工智能组队场景中学生如何与人工智能协作的基本过程却鲜有研究。为了在教育领域开发有效的人工智能应用,有必要了解学生与人工智能互动(SAI)过程中因学生特点而产生的差异。本研究试图填补这一空白,探索不同绘画水平和对人工智能态度的学生在完成公共广告绘画任务时的 SAI 过程差异。基于从 20 名韩国本科生的思考-朗读协议中获得的经验证据,本研究首先进行了滞后序列分析,以确定各组在统计上具有显著意义的线性模式,然后通过编码活动排列序列将其按时间顺序纳入 SAI 持续时间,以区分各组的整体 SAI 过程。该研究揭示了对人工智能和绘画技能持不同态度的学生在 SAI 过程中的明显差异。为了更好地促进学生-人工智能团队的学习,探讨了人工智能教育发展和教学设计的一系列意义。对实践或政策的启示:教育人工智能不应局限于执行特定任务和解决定义明确的问题。教育人工智能应能提高学生的元认知和情感参与度。应组建一个由不同利益相关者组成的教育人工智能系统架构师团队,共同设计人工智能系统。
Differences in student-AI interaction process on a drawing task: Focusing on students’ attitude towards AI and the level of drawing skills
Recent advances and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) have increased the opportunities for students to interact with AI in their learning tasks. Although various fields of scholarly research have investigated human-AI collaboration, the underlying processes of how students collaborate with AI in a student-AI teaming scenario have been scarcely investigated. To develop effective AI applications in education, it is necessary to understand differences in the student-AI interaction (SAI) process depending on students' characteristics. The present study attempts to fill this gap by exploring the differences in the SAI process amongst students with varying drawing proficiencies and attitudes towards AI in performing a public advertisement drawing task. Based on the empirical evidence obtained from the think-aloud protocols of 20 Korean undergraduate students, the study first conducted a lag sequential analysis to identify statistically significant linear patterns of each group and then chronologically incorporated them into the SAI duration via coded activity alignment series to distinguish the overall SAI process of each group. The study revealed the distinctive differences in SAI processes of students with different attitudes towards AI and drawing skills. To better facilitate student-AI teams for learning, a range of implications of educational AI development and instructional design is discussed.
Implications for practice or policy:
Educational AI should not be limited to performing a specific task and solving well-defined problems. It should be designed with a holistic view of the end-to-end student-AI process, interconnected to different learning activities in the learning process.
Educational AI should be capable of increasing students’ metacognition and emotional engagement.
An educational AI system architect team inclusive of diverse stakeholders should be formed to collaboratively design the AI system.