解剖型全肩关节置换术后肩袖撕裂和无菌性关节盂松弛的风险因素

Stephen A. Parada, Chris Peach, Wen Fan, J. Elwell, P. Flurin, T. Wright, Joseph D. Zuckerman, C. Roche
{"title":"解剖型全肩关节置换术后肩袖撕裂和无菌性关节盂松弛的风险因素","authors":"Stephen A. Parada, Chris Peach, Wen Fan, J. Elwell, P. Flurin, T. Wright, Joseph D. Zuckerman, C. Roche","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze all primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients within a multi-center international database of a single prosthesis to identify patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) and aseptic glenoid loosening to determine the rates of these complications. Additionally, we sought to compare each of these complication cohorts to a cohort without these complications in order to identify risk factors for each complication type. Methods : aTSA patients were prospectively enrolled in a multi-center international database of a single platform shoulder system (Equinoxe; Exactech Inc, Gainesville, FL). Data was collected at 37 different clinical sites in the US and Europe using standardized forms according to an IRB approved protocol. Every patient was consented and all data was collected at each site and directly uploaded to a secure centralized IBM database. These standardized forms collected demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities, implant size/type, pre-operative range of motion, pre-operative radiographic findings, and pre-operative clinical outcome metric scores. To investigate the risk factors for RCT and also the risk factors for aseptic glenoid loosening, we retrospectively analyzed all data from aTSA patients in this database, only excluding patients with a history of revision arthroplasty and humeral fractures. Univariate statistical analyses were conducted to compare primary aTSA patients who had report of: 1) a RCT and/or subscapularis failure and 2) aseptic glenoid loosening to a","PeriodicalId":137774,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Rotator Cuff Tears and Aseptic Glenoid Loosening After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Stephen A. Parada, Chris Peach, Wen Fan, J. Elwell, P. Flurin, T. Wright, Joseph D. Zuckerman, C. Roche\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction : The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze all primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients within a multi-center international database of a single prosthesis to identify patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) and aseptic glenoid loosening to determine the rates of these complications. Additionally, we sought to compare each of these complication cohorts to a cohort without these complications in order to identify risk factors for each complication type. Methods : aTSA patients were prospectively enrolled in a multi-center international database of a single platform shoulder system (Equinoxe; Exactech Inc, Gainesville, FL). Data was collected at 37 different clinical sites in the US and Europe using standardized forms according to an IRB approved protocol. Every patient was consented and all data was collected at each site and directly uploaded to a secure centralized IBM database. These standardized forms collected demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities, implant size/type, pre-operative range of motion, pre-operative radiographic findings, and pre-operative clinical outcome metric scores. To investigate the risk factors for RCT and also the risk factors for aseptic glenoid loosening, we retrospectively analyzed all data from aTSA patients in this database, only excluding patients with a history of revision arthroplasty and humeral fractures. Univariate statistical analyses were conducted to compare primary aTSA patients who had report of: 1) a RCT and/or subscapularis failure and 2) aseptic glenoid loosening to a\",\"PeriodicalId\":137774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES\",\"volume\":\"90 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2024.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:本研究的目的是回顾性分析一个多中心国际数据库中单个假体的所有原发性解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)患者,以确定肩袖撕裂(RCT)和无菌性盂骨松动患者,从而确定这些并发症的发生率。此外,我们还试图将这些并发症的患者群与未出现这些并发症的患者群进行比较,以确定每种并发症类型的风险因素。方法:aTSA 患者被前瞻性地纳入了单平台肩关节系统(Equinoxe; Exactech Inc, Gainesville, FL)的多中心国际数据库。数据收集工作在美国和欧洲的 37 个不同临床研究机构进行,根据 IRB 批准的方案使用标准化表格收集数据。每位患者都经过了同意,所有数据都是在每个地点收集的,并直接上传到安全的 IBM 中央数据库。这些标准化表格收集了人口统计学数据、诊断、合并症、植入物大小/类型、术前活动范围、术前放射学检查结果和术前临床结果指标评分。为了研究RCT的风险因素以及无菌性盂骨松动的风险因素,我们回顾性分析了该数据库中所有aTSA患者的数据,仅排除了有翻修关节成形术史和肱骨骨折的患者。我们进行了单变量统计分析,以比较有以下报告的原发性 aTSA 患者:1)有 RCT 和/或亚临床研究报告的患者:1)RCT和/或肩胛下肌失败;2)无菌性盂骨松动的初治 aTSA 患者与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors for Rotator Cuff Tears and Aseptic Glenoid Loosening After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Introduction : The purpose of this study is to retrospectively analyze all primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients within a multi-center international database of a single prosthesis to identify patients with rotator cuff tear (RCT) and aseptic glenoid loosening to determine the rates of these complications. Additionally, we sought to compare each of these complication cohorts to a cohort without these complications in order to identify risk factors for each complication type. Methods : aTSA patients were prospectively enrolled in a multi-center international database of a single platform shoulder system (Equinoxe; Exactech Inc, Gainesville, FL). Data was collected at 37 different clinical sites in the US and Europe using standardized forms according to an IRB approved protocol. Every patient was consented and all data was collected at each site and directly uploaded to a secure centralized IBM database. These standardized forms collected demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities, implant size/type, pre-operative range of motion, pre-operative radiographic findings, and pre-operative clinical outcome metric scores. To investigate the risk factors for RCT and also the risk factors for aseptic glenoid loosening, we retrospectively analyzed all data from aTSA patients in this database, only excluding patients with a history of revision arthroplasty and humeral fractures. Univariate statistical analyses were conducted to compare primary aTSA patients who had report of: 1) a RCT and/or subscapularis failure and 2) aseptic glenoid loosening to a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信