基于群体的气候关切误解对效能和行动的影响

Zoe Leviston , Tanvi Nangrani , Samantha K. Stanley , Iain Walker
{"title":"基于群体的气候关切误解对效能和行动的影响","authors":"Zoe Leviston ,&nbsp;Tanvi Nangrani ,&nbsp;Samantha K. Stanley ,&nbsp;Iain Walker","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>People tend to underestimate others’ environmental values, including when judging the values of minority-status groups. Using a large national sample (<em>N</em> = 5110), we test whether these misperceptions extend to concern about climate change in Australia, and differ depending on immigrant status, ethnicity, and where one is located (i.e., in or outside capital cities). We also examine the consequences of misperceptions for self-efficacy and pro-environmental behaviour. We find personal climate concern is high, but perceptions of others’ concern is lower. Immigrants and Australian-born participants have similarly high concern, but both groups underestimate how concerned immigrants are. Southern-Central-Asian identifiers are the most concerned; Australian identifiers relatively less so. All ethnic categories appeared to underestimate the concern of their own ethnicity. City-dwellers had slightly higher concern than those in regional or rural areas, but city-dwellers' concern was underestimated by people regardless of their location. Those who underestimated others’ concern had lower pro-environmental behavioural engagement compared to those who overestimated concern, and this was mediated by lower self-efficacy. We suggest that strategies to promote climate engagement and efficacy go beyond attempting to correct misperceptions, and encompass approaches that promote environmentally-relevant social interaction across different groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000108/pdfft?md5=c005a19194ce9ed9752cfe361f673fb4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666622724000108-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequences of group-based misperceptions of climate concern for efficacy and action\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Leviston ,&nbsp;Tanvi Nangrani ,&nbsp;Samantha K. Stanley ,&nbsp;Iain Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>People tend to underestimate others’ environmental values, including when judging the values of minority-status groups. Using a large national sample (<em>N</em> = 5110), we test whether these misperceptions extend to concern about climate change in Australia, and differ depending on immigrant status, ethnicity, and where one is located (i.e., in or outside capital cities). We also examine the consequences of misperceptions for self-efficacy and pro-environmental behaviour. We find personal climate concern is high, but perceptions of others’ concern is lower. Immigrants and Australian-born participants have similarly high concern, but both groups underestimate how concerned immigrants are. Southern-Central-Asian identifiers are the most concerned; Australian identifiers relatively less so. All ethnic categories appeared to underestimate the concern of their own ethnicity. City-dwellers had slightly higher concern than those in regional or rural areas, but city-dwellers' concern was underestimated by people regardless of their location. Those who underestimated others’ concern had lower pro-environmental behavioural engagement compared to those who overestimated concern, and this was mediated by lower self-efficacy. We suggest that strategies to promote climate engagement and efficacy go beyond attempting to correct misperceptions, and encompass approaches that promote environmentally-relevant social interaction across different groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in ecological and social psychology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000108/pdfft?md5=c005a19194ce9ed9752cfe361f673fb4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666622724000108-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in ecological and social psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们倾向于低估他人的环境价值观,包括在判断少数身份群体的价值观时。我们使用大量全国样本(N = 5110),检验了这些误解是否会延伸到对澳大利亚气候变化的关注,以及是否会因移民身份、种族和所处位置(即在首府城市内或首府城市外)而有所不同。我们还研究了误解对自我效能和亲环境行为的影响。我们发现,个人对气候的关注度较高,但对他人关注度的感知较低。移民和澳大利亚出生的参与者对气候的关注度同样很高,但这两个群体都低估了移民的关注度。南中亚裔参与者最为关注,而澳大利亚裔参与者则相对较少。所有族裔似乎都低估了自己族裔的担忧程度。城市居民的关注度略高于地区或农村居民,但城市居民的关注度被不同地区的人低估了。与高估他人关注度的人相比,低估他人关注度的人的亲环境行为参与度较低,而低估他人关注度的人的自我效能感较低。我们建议,促进气候参与和效能的战略不仅要试图纠正错误认知,还要包括促进不同群体之间与环境相关的社会互动的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Consequences of group-based misperceptions of climate concern for efficacy and action

Consequences of group-based misperceptions of climate concern for efficacy and action

People tend to underestimate others’ environmental values, including when judging the values of minority-status groups. Using a large national sample (N = 5110), we test whether these misperceptions extend to concern about climate change in Australia, and differ depending on immigrant status, ethnicity, and where one is located (i.e., in or outside capital cities). We also examine the consequences of misperceptions for self-efficacy and pro-environmental behaviour. We find personal climate concern is high, but perceptions of others’ concern is lower. Immigrants and Australian-born participants have similarly high concern, but both groups underestimate how concerned immigrants are. Southern-Central-Asian identifiers are the most concerned; Australian identifiers relatively less so. All ethnic categories appeared to underestimate the concern of their own ethnicity. City-dwellers had slightly higher concern than those in regional or rural areas, but city-dwellers' concern was underestimated by people regardless of their location. Those who underestimated others’ concern had lower pro-environmental behavioural engagement compared to those who overestimated concern, and this was mediated by lower self-efficacy. We suggest that strategies to promote climate engagement and efficacy go beyond attempting to correct misperceptions, and encompass approaches that promote environmentally-relevant social interaction across different groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信