双极和单极经尿道前列腺切除术、功能结果和并发症预测因素分析的比较:前瞻性研究

Y. Boukhlifi, Mohammed Tetou, Larbi Hamedoun, Karim Blelhaj, M. Mrabti, Abdessamad Elbahri, N. Louardi, Mohammed Alami, Ahmed Ameur
{"title":"双极和单极经尿道前列腺切除术、功能结果和并发症预测因素分析的比较:前瞻性研究","authors":"Y. Boukhlifi, Mohammed Tetou, Larbi Hamedoun, Karim Blelhaj, M. Mrabti, Abdessamad Elbahri, N. Louardi, Mohammed Alami, Ahmed Ameur","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In Morocco, RTUP-m is considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of prostate adenomas, recommended for prostates with a volume suitable for resection in less than 60 minutes. Additionally, the challenge arises when dealing with patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications due to the associated risk of bleeding, hence the significance of RTUP-b. The objective of our study is to compare the functional outcomes and immediate postoperative complications between these two techniques and to identify predictive factors for complications. Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted between January 2022 and September 2022. The variables age, BMI, surgical indication, transrectal prostate volume, ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists), previous pharmacological treatments, IPSS score, quality of life index (QLI), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postoperative complications were collected. The Chi2 test and Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Sixty-nine consecutive patients were included, 38 patients in the monopolar TURP group and 31 in the bipolar TURP group. Both groups were homogeneous in their baseline characteristics. The overall pre-surgical IPSS/QLI/Qmax score was 24,03/4,73/9,47. Functional results at 1st and 3rd month are shown in Table 1. For complications, see Table 2 and 3. These differences were not statistically significant (p = 0,427): the most frequent were hematuria (9,4%) and febrile urinary tract infections (9,4%). Only one patient presented hyponatremia due to glycocol reabsorption in the monopolar group. All complications were Clavien 1 or 2. We found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to complications or their predictive factors. Conclusion: Analysis of our data over the first three months reveals no differences between the two techniques in terms of functional results and postoperative complications, and there are no predictive .........","PeriodicalId":504829,"journal":{"name":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Bipolar and Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Functional Outcomes and Analysis of Factors Predictive of Complications: A Prospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Y. Boukhlifi, Mohammed Tetou, Larbi Hamedoun, Karim Blelhaj, M. Mrabti, Abdessamad Elbahri, N. Louardi, Mohammed Alami, Ahmed Ameur\",\"doi\":\"10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In Morocco, RTUP-m is considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of prostate adenomas, recommended for prostates with a volume suitable for resection in less than 60 minutes. Additionally, the challenge arises when dealing with patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications due to the associated risk of bleeding, hence the significance of RTUP-b. The objective of our study is to compare the functional outcomes and immediate postoperative complications between these two techniques and to identify predictive factors for complications. Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted between January 2022 and September 2022. The variables age, BMI, surgical indication, transrectal prostate volume, ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists), previous pharmacological treatments, IPSS score, quality of life index (QLI), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postoperative complications were collected. The Chi2 test and Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Sixty-nine consecutive patients were included, 38 patients in the monopolar TURP group and 31 in the bipolar TURP group. Both groups were homogeneous in their baseline characteristics. The overall pre-surgical IPSS/QLI/Qmax score was 24,03/4,73/9,47. Functional results at 1st and 3rd month are shown in Table 1. For complications, see Table 2 and 3. These differences were not statistically significant (p = 0,427): the most frequent were hematuria (9,4%) and febrile urinary tract infections (9,4%). Only one patient presented hyponatremia due to glycocol reabsorption in the monopolar group. All complications were Clavien 1 or 2. We found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to complications or their predictive factors. Conclusion: Analysis of our data over the first three months reveals no differences between the two techniques in terms of functional results and postoperative complications, and there are no predictive .........\",\"PeriodicalId\":504829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i02.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介在摩洛哥,RTUP-m 被认为是前列腺腺瘤手术治疗的黄金标准,推荐用于体积适合在 60 分钟内切除的前列腺。此外,在治疗服用抗血小板或抗凝药物的患者时,由于存在相关的出血风险而面临挑战,因此 RTUP-b 具有重要意义。我们的研究目的是比较这两种技术的功能结果和术后即刻并发症,并找出并发症的预测因素。研究方法这是一项前瞻性随机研究,于 2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月间进行。研究收集了年龄、体重指数、手术指征、经直肠前列腺体积、ASA分类(美国麻醉医师协会)、既往药物治疗、IPSS评分、生活质量指数(QLI)、最大流速(Qmax)和术后并发症等变量。统计分析采用 Chi2 检验和学生 t 检验。结果共纳入 69 例连续患者,其中单极 TURP 组 38 例,双极 TURP 组 31 例。两组患者的基线特征相同。手术前总的 IPSS/QLI/Qmax 评分为 24.03/4.73/9.47。第1个月和第3个月的功能结果见表1。并发症见表 2 和表 3。这些差异无统计学意义(P = 0.427):最常见的并发症是血尿(9.4%)和发热性尿路感染(9.4%)。在单极组中,只有一名患者因甘油三酯重吸收而出现低钠血症。所有并发症均为克拉维恩 1 级或 2 级。我们发现两组患者在并发症或其预测因素方面没有明显差异。结论我们对头三个月的数据进行了分析,发现两种技术在功能效果和术后并发症方面没有差异,也没有预测性.........。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Bipolar and Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Functional Outcomes and Analysis of Factors Predictive of Complications: A Prospective Study
Introduction: In Morocco, RTUP-m is considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of prostate adenomas, recommended for prostates with a volume suitable for resection in less than 60 minutes. Additionally, the challenge arises when dealing with patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications due to the associated risk of bleeding, hence the significance of RTUP-b. The objective of our study is to compare the functional outcomes and immediate postoperative complications between these two techniques and to identify predictive factors for complications. Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted between January 2022 and September 2022. The variables age, BMI, surgical indication, transrectal prostate volume, ASA classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists), previous pharmacological treatments, IPSS score, quality of life index (QLI), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postoperative complications were collected. The Chi2 test and Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Sixty-nine consecutive patients were included, 38 patients in the monopolar TURP group and 31 in the bipolar TURP group. Both groups were homogeneous in their baseline characteristics. The overall pre-surgical IPSS/QLI/Qmax score was 24,03/4,73/9,47. Functional results at 1st and 3rd month are shown in Table 1. For complications, see Table 2 and 3. These differences were not statistically significant (p = 0,427): the most frequent were hematuria (9,4%) and febrile urinary tract infections (9,4%). Only one patient presented hyponatremia due to glycocol reabsorption in the monopolar group. All complications were Clavien 1 or 2. We found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to complications or their predictive factors. Conclusion: Analysis of our data over the first three months reveals no differences between the two techniques in terms of functional results and postoperative complications, and there are no predictive .........
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信