β受体阻滞剂--仍是最佳选择还是义务?

Tammiraju Iragavarapu
{"title":"β受体阻滞剂--仍是最佳选择还是义务?","authors":"Tammiraju Iragavarapu","doi":"10.1177/26324636231226031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beta blockers (BBs) are widely acknowledged as a standard care for numerous cardiovascular conditions. They have a long-established history in treating angina, regulating heart rate in atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, and managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). The effectiveness of BBs in treating acute coronary syndrome was established during a time when reperfusion therapies were not readily available. However, with the recent advancements in coronary revascularization techniques, the role of BB therapy in managing patients after a myocardial infarction and in those with stable angina has become a subject of debate. Likewise, there are uncertainties about the efficacy of BBs in individuals with HFREF who also suffer from atrial fibrillation, as well as in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). Furthermore, there are numerous concerns about using BBs as the initial therapy, as was customary in hypertension management in the past, and safety concerns regarding their use in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This comprehensive review aims to thoroughly examine all existing recent evidence concerning BB therapy in various cardiovascular scenarios and to provide a valuable guidance to the clinicians in the field of cardiology.","PeriodicalId":429933,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical Cardiology","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beta Blockers—Still the Best Option or an Obligation!\",\"authors\":\"Tammiraju Iragavarapu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26324636231226031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beta blockers (BBs) are widely acknowledged as a standard care for numerous cardiovascular conditions. They have a long-established history in treating angina, regulating heart rate in atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, and managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). The effectiveness of BBs in treating acute coronary syndrome was established during a time when reperfusion therapies were not readily available. However, with the recent advancements in coronary revascularization techniques, the role of BB therapy in managing patients after a myocardial infarction and in those with stable angina has become a subject of debate. Likewise, there are uncertainties about the efficacy of BBs in individuals with HFREF who also suffer from atrial fibrillation, as well as in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). Furthermore, there are numerous concerns about using BBs as the initial therapy, as was customary in hypertension management in the past, and safety concerns regarding their use in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This comprehensive review aims to thoroughly examine all existing recent evidence concerning BB therapy in various cardiovascular scenarios and to provide a valuable guidance to the clinicians in the field of cardiology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26324636231226031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26324636231226031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

β受体阻滞剂(BBs)是公认的治疗多种心血管疾病的标准药物。它们在治疗心绞痛、调节心房颤动和室性心动过速的心率以及控制射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFREF)方面有着悠久的历史。BBs治疗急性冠脉综合征的疗效是在没有再灌注疗法的时代确立的。然而,随着冠状动脉血管重建技术的不断进步,BB 疗法在心肌梗死后和稳定型心绞痛患者中的作用已成为一个争论的话题。同样,对于同时患有心房颤动的高频心力衰竭患者以及射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFPEF)患者,BBs 的疗效也存在不确定性。此外,将 BBs 作为初始疗法(这是过去高血压治疗的惯例)也存在许多问题,而且在接受非心脏手术的患者中使用 BBs 的安全性也令人担忧。这篇综合综述旨在全面研究有关在各种心血管情况下使用 BB 疗法的所有现有最新证据,并为心脏病学领域的临床医生提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beta Blockers—Still the Best Option or an Obligation!
Beta blockers (BBs) are widely acknowledged as a standard care for numerous cardiovascular conditions. They have a long-established history in treating angina, regulating heart rate in atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, and managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF). The effectiveness of BBs in treating acute coronary syndrome was established during a time when reperfusion therapies were not readily available. However, with the recent advancements in coronary revascularization techniques, the role of BB therapy in managing patients after a myocardial infarction and in those with stable angina has become a subject of debate. Likewise, there are uncertainties about the efficacy of BBs in individuals with HFREF who also suffer from atrial fibrillation, as well as in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). Furthermore, there are numerous concerns about using BBs as the initial therapy, as was customary in hypertension management in the past, and safety concerns regarding their use in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This comprehensive review aims to thoroughly examine all existing recent evidence concerning BB therapy in various cardiovascular scenarios and to provide a valuable guidance to the clinicians in the field of cardiology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信