采用不同刀片机构的动力除草机在行内除草作业中的性能评估

S. M. Khayer, Thaneswer Patel, Britan Rahman, Perves Ahmed
{"title":"采用不同刀片机构的动力除草机在行内除草作业中的性能评估","authors":"S. M. Khayer, Thaneswer Patel, Britan Rahman, Perves Ahmed","doi":"10.9734/acri/2024/v24i2632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Weeding operation is one of the most laborious and time-consuming operation in agriculture. Weeds basically an unwanted plant which competes with crop for light, moisture, and nutrient along with lowering the overall yield. Mechanical weed control methods are preferred among all weeding methods due to many reasons such as timeliness, safety, drudgery and cost effective. \nStudy Area and Duration: The experiment was conducted in the farmer’s field of Abhayapuri, Bongaigaon, Assam in the year 2021 to 2023. \nMethodology: This study employed a 5.75 hp self-propelled diesel engine with three blade sets—rotary, non-rotary, and a combination of both, designed for weeding in vegetable fields with row spacing up to 75 cm. One-way ANOVA analysis compared group means for statistical significance. \nResults: Results showed that the field efficiency (90%), fuel consumption (7.7 l/ha), cost of operation (Rs 1217.7 per ha) and plant damage factor (0.01%) was better for rotary blade than non-rotary and combined blade. Whereas effective field capacity (0.07 ha/h), performance index (155.7) and man-hour/ha (14.3) was better for non-rotary blade and the parameters such as depth (4.4 cm) and weeding efficiency (94.2%) was better for combined blade mechanism. From the one-way ANOVA analysis, it showed that blade mechanism showed significant difference on parameters like weeding efficiency, field efficiency, fuel consumption, effective field capacity, cost of operation, man-h/ha and performance index at p<0.05 and non-significant for depth and plant damage factor at P<0.05. \nConclusion: Study concluded that for intra-row weeding operation, rotary blade along with non-rotary blade was suitable economically whereas combined blade was suitable for weeding performance only besides high cost.","PeriodicalId":505151,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Current Research International","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Power Weeder with Different Blade Mechanism in Intra-row Weeding Operation\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Khayer, Thaneswer Patel, Britan Rahman, Perves Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/acri/2024/v24i2632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: Weeding operation is one of the most laborious and time-consuming operation in agriculture. Weeds basically an unwanted plant which competes with crop for light, moisture, and nutrient along with lowering the overall yield. Mechanical weed control methods are preferred among all weeding methods due to many reasons such as timeliness, safety, drudgery and cost effective. \\nStudy Area and Duration: The experiment was conducted in the farmer’s field of Abhayapuri, Bongaigaon, Assam in the year 2021 to 2023. \\nMethodology: This study employed a 5.75 hp self-propelled diesel engine with three blade sets—rotary, non-rotary, and a combination of both, designed for weeding in vegetable fields with row spacing up to 75 cm. One-way ANOVA analysis compared group means for statistical significance. \\nResults: Results showed that the field efficiency (90%), fuel consumption (7.7 l/ha), cost of operation (Rs 1217.7 per ha) and plant damage factor (0.01%) was better for rotary blade than non-rotary and combined blade. Whereas effective field capacity (0.07 ha/h), performance index (155.7) and man-hour/ha (14.3) was better for non-rotary blade and the parameters such as depth (4.4 cm) and weeding efficiency (94.2%) was better for combined blade mechanism. From the one-way ANOVA analysis, it showed that blade mechanism showed significant difference on parameters like weeding efficiency, field efficiency, fuel consumption, effective field capacity, cost of operation, man-h/ha and performance index at p<0.05 and non-significant for depth and plant damage factor at P<0.05. \\nConclusion: Study concluded that for intra-row weeding operation, rotary blade along with non-rotary blade was suitable economically whereas combined blade was suitable for weeding performance only besides high cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Current Research International\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Current Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i2632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Current Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i2632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:除草作业是农业中最费力、最耗时的作业之一。杂草基本上是一种不需要的植物,它会与作物争夺光照、水分和养分,同时降低总产量。在所有除草方法中,机械除草方法是首选,原因有很多,如及时、安全、省力和成本效益高。研究区域和时间:实验于 2021 年至 2023 年在阿萨姆邦邦加贡 Abhayapuri 的农民田里进行。研究方法:本研究使用了一台 5.75 马力的自走式柴油发动机,配有三套刀片--旋转式、非旋转式和两者的组合,设计用于行距达 75 厘米的菜地除草。单因子方差分析比较了各组的平均值,以确定统计意义。结果显示结果表明,旋转式刀片的田间效率(90%)、燃料消耗(7.7 升/公顷)、作业成本(1217.7 卢比/公顷)和植株损伤系数(0.01%)均优于非旋转式刀片和组合式刀片。而非旋转式刀片的有效田间作业能力(0.07 公顷/小时)、性能指数(155.7)和工时/公顷(14.3)优于旋转式刀片,组合式刀片机制的深度(4.4 厘米)和除草效率(94.2%)等参数优于旋转式刀片。单因素方差分析表明,刀片装置在除草效率、田间效率、燃料消耗、有效田间容量、作业成本、工时/公顷和性能指标等参数上的差异显著(P<0.05),而在深度和植害系数上的差异不显著(P<0.05)。结论研究得出结论,对于行内除草作业,旋耕刀片和非旋耕刀片在经济上是合适的,而组合刀片除成本高外,仅在除草性能上合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of Power Weeder with Different Blade Mechanism in Intra-row Weeding Operation
Aims: Weeding operation is one of the most laborious and time-consuming operation in agriculture. Weeds basically an unwanted plant which competes with crop for light, moisture, and nutrient along with lowering the overall yield. Mechanical weed control methods are preferred among all weeding methods due to many reasons such as timeliness, safety, drudgery and cost effective. Study Area and Duration: The experiment was conducted in the farmer’s field of Abhayapuri, Bongaigaon, Assam in the year 2021 to 2023. Methodology: This study employed a 5.75 hp self-propelled diesel engine with three blade sets—rotary, non-rotary, and a combination of both, designed for weeding in vegetable fields with row spacing up to 75 cm. One-way ANOVA analysis compared group means for statistical significance. Results: Results showed that the field efficiency (90%), fuel consumption (7.7 l/ha), cost of operation (Rs 1217.7 per ha) and plant damage factor (0.01%) was better for rotary blade than non-rotary and combined blade. Whereas effective field capacity (0.07 ha/h), performance index (155.7) and man-hour/ha (14.3) was better for non-rotary blade and the parameters such as depth (4.4 cm) and weeding efficiency (94.2%) was better for combined blade mechanism. From the one-way ANOVA analysis, it showed that blade mechanism showed significant difference on parameters like weeding efficiency, field efficiency, fuel consumption, effective field capacity, cost of operation, man-h/ha and performance index at p<0.05 and non-significant for depth and plant damage factor at P<0.05. Conclusion: Study concluded that for intra-row weeding operation, rotary blade along with non-rotary blade was suitable economically whereas combined blade was suitable for weeding performance only besides high cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信