急性缺血性脑卒中支架-再障血栓切除术后血管大小和血管造影结果的变化:STRATIS 登记

Hamidreza Saber, M. Froehler, Osama O. Zaidat, Ali Aziz Sultan, R. Klucznik, J. Saver, N. Sanossian, Frank R Hellinger, Dileep R. Yavagal, Tom L Yao, Reza Jahan, Diogo C. Haussen, Raul G Nogueira, Alicia M. Hall, Nils H. Mueller Kronast, David S. Liebeskind
{"title":"急性缺血性脑卒中支架-再障血栓切除术后血管大小和血管造影结果的变化:STRATIS 登记","authors":"Hamidreza Saber, M. Froehler, Osama O. Zaidat, Ali Aziz Sultan, R. Klucznik, J. Saver, N. Sanossian, Frank R Hellinger, Dileep R. Yavagal, Tom L Yao, Reza Jahan, Diogo C. Haussen, Raul G Nogueira, Alicia M. Hall, Nils H. Mueller Kronast, David S. Liebeskind","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.000978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Mechanical thrombectomy is established for large‐vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke, but the potential role in distal vessel occlusions of medium arteries is less well established. Such medium or distal arterial segments have not been assessed with respect to thrombectomy devices used during endovascular therapy. We conducted an analysis of arterial size, segmental anatomy, and stent‐retriever device performance with respect to vessel size during thrombectomy.\n \n \n \n The STRATIS registry angiography core laboratory adjudicated the exact location of the occlusion, proximal, and distal device deployment, relationship to arterial bifurcations, and anatomic nomenclature. Arterial diameters were measured at all these sites. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between vessel and stent size, and arterial recanalization using expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction reperfusion score.\n \n \n \n \n Overall, 665 patients with stroke were included following thrombectomy using various Solitaire device sizes, including Solitaire 4×40, Solitaire 6×30, Solitaire 4×20, Solitaire 6×20, and Solitaire 4×15. Arterial diameter at the occlusion site was a median of 2.17 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 1.88–2.60 mm) in the distal M1, 1.67 mm (IQR, 1.47–2.06 mm) in the proximal M2 middle cerebral artery, 1.50 mm (IQR, 1.15–1.61 mm) in the distal M2 middle cerebral artery, 1.24 mm (IQR, 1.11–1.24 mm) in the M3 middle cerebral artery, and 1.88 mm (IQR, 1.49–1.94 mm) in the P1 posterior cerebral artery. Expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b to 3 reperfusion was achieved in all M3 or P1 segment occlusions. The rate of first‐pass recanalization was significantly higher in patients with medium (0.75–2 mm) versus large (>2 mm) vessel occlusion (69.5% versus 57.1%;\n P\n  = 0.003).\n \n \n \n \n Considerable overlap was noted between arterial sizes at occlusion sites carrying different segmental arterial nomenclature or vessel names. Substantial reperfusion may be achieved with currently available mechanical thrombectomy devices in medium arteries.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in Vessel Size and Angiographic Outcomes Following Stent‐Retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: STRATIS Registry\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Saber, M. Froehler, Osama O. Zaidat, Ali Aziz Sultan, R. Klucznik, J. Saver, N. Sanossian, Frank R Hellinger, Dileep R. Yavagal, Tom L Yao, Reza Jahan, Diogo C. Haussen, Raul G Nogueira, Alicia M. Hall, Nils H. Mueller Kronast, David S. Liebeskind\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.123.000978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Mechanical thrombectomy is established for large‐vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke, but the potential role in distal vessel occlusions of medium arteries is less well established. Such medium or distal arterial segments have not been assessed with respect to thrombectomy devices used during endovascular therapy. We conducted an analysis of arterial size, segmental anatomy, and stent‐retriever device performance with respect to vessel size during thrombectomy.\\n \\n \\n \\n The STRATIS registry angiography core laboratory adjudicated the exact location of the occlusion, proximal, and distal device deployment, relationship to arterial bifurcations, and anatomic nomenclature. Arterial diameters were measured at all these sites. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between vessel and stent size, and arterial recanalization using expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction reperfusion score.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Overall, 665 patients with stroke were included following thrombectomy using various Solitaire device sizes, including Solitaire 4×40, Solitaire 6×30, Solitaire 4×20, Solitaire 6×20, and Solitaire 4×15. Arterial diameter at the occlusion site was a median of 2.17 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 1.88–2.60 mm) in the distal M1, 1.67 mm (IQR, 1.47–2.06 mm) in the proximal M2 middle cerebral artery, 1.50 mm (IQR, 1.15–1.61 mm) in the distal M2 middle cerebral artery, 1.24 mm (IQR, 1.11–1.24 mm) in the M3 middle cerebral artery, and 1.88 mm (IQR, 1.49–1.94 mm) in the P1 posterior cerebral artery. Expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b to 3 reperfusion was achieved in all M3 or P1 segment occlusions. The rate of first‐pass recanalization was significantly higher in patients with medium (0.75–2 mm) versus large (>2 mm) vessel occlusion (69.5% versus 57.1%;\\n P\\n  = 0.003).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Considerable overlap was noted between arterial sizes at occlusion sites carrying different segmental arterial nomenclature or vessel names. Substantial reperfusion may be achieved with currently available mechanical thrombectomy devices in medium arteries.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.000978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.000978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机械血栓切除术已被确定用于急性缺血性中风的大血管闭塞,但在中动脉远端血管闭塞中的潜在作用还不太确定。对于血管内治疗中使用的血栓清除装置,尚未对此类中动脉或远端动脉段进行评估。我们对血栓切除术中与血管大小相关的动脉大小、节段解剖和支架截流器设备性能进行了分析。 STRATIS 注册血管造影核心实验室对闭塞的确切位置、近端和远端装置部署、与动脉分叉的关系以及解剖命名进行了裁定。在所有这些部位都测量了动脉直径。统计分析采用扩大的脑梗塞溶栓再灌注评分法研究了血管和支架尺寸与动脉再通畅之间的关系。 共有 665 名中风患者在使用不同尺寸的 Solitaire 装置(包括 Solitaire 4×40、Solitaire 6×30、Solitaire 4×20、Solitaire 6×20 和 Solitaire 4×15)进行血栓切除术后纳入研究。闭塞部位的动脉直径中位数为:M1 远端 2.17 毫米(四分位数间距 [IQR],1.88-2.60 毫米),M2 大脑中动脉近端 1.67 毫米(IQR,1.47-2.06 毫米),M2 大脑中动脉远端 1.M2大脑中动脉远端为1.50毫米(IQR,1.15-1.61毫米),M3大脑中动脉为1.24毫米(IQR,1.11-1.24毫米),P1大脑后动脉为1.88毫米(IQR,1.49-1.94毫米)。所有M3或P1段闭塞都实现了脑梗塞扩大溶栓2b至3再灌注。中型(0.75-2 毫米)血管闭塞患者的首次再通率明显高于大型(>2 毫米)血管闭塞患者(69.5% 对 57.1%;P = 0.003)。 不同节段动脉命名法或血管名称的闭塞部位的动脉大小有很大的重叠。在中等动脉中使用现有的机械血栓清除装置可实现大量再灌注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in Vessel Size and Angiographic Outcomes Following Stent‐Retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: STRATIS Registry
Mechanical thrombectomy is established for large‐vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke, but the potential role in distal vessel occlusions of medium arteries is less well established. Such medium or distal arterial segments have not been assessed with respect to thrombectomy devices used during endovascular therapy. We conducted an analysis of arterial size, segmental anatomy, and stent‐retriever device performance with respect to vessel size during thrombectomy. The STRATIS registry angiography core laboratory adjudicated the exact location of the occlusion, proximal, and distal device deployment, relationship to arterial bifurcations, and anatomic nomenclature. Arterial diameters were measured at all these sites. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between vessel and stent size, and arterial recanalization using expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction reperfusion score. Overall, 665 patients with stroke were included following thrombectomy using various Solitaire device sizes, including Solitaire 4×40, Solitaire 6×30, Solitaire 4×20, Solitaire 6×20, and Solitaire 4×15. Arterial diameter at the occlusion site was a median of 2.17 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 1.88–2.60 mm) in the distal M1, 1.67 mm (IQR, 1.47–2.06 mm) in the proximal M2 middle cerebral artery, 1.50 mm (IQR, 1.15–1.61 mm) in the distal M2 middle cerebral artery, 1.24 mm (IQR, 1.11–1.24 mm) in the M3 middle cerebral artery, and 1.88 mm (IQR, 1.49–1.94 mm) in the P1 posterior cerebral artery. Expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b to 3 reperfusion was achieved in all M3 or P1 segment occlusions. The rate of first‐pass recanalization was significantly higher in patients with medium (0.75–2 mm) versus large (>2 mm) vessel occlusion (69.5% versus 57.1%; P  = 0.003). Considerable overlap was noted between arterial sizes at occlusion sites carrying different segmental arterial nomenclature or vessel names. Substantial reperfusion may be achieved with currently available mechanical thrombectomy devices in medium arteries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信