第二个列昂惕夫悖论:经济理论还是经济工程?

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
U. A. Parkhimenka
{"title":"第二个列昂惕夫悖论:经济理论还是经济工程?","authors":"U. A. Parkhimenka","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-84-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the situation, conventionally called the \"Second Leontief Paradox\", when a recognized scientist, Nobel laureate and undisputed authority in the academic environment, it turns out, has practically no place in modern economic theory - neither within the \"mainstream\" nor in unorthodox directions. This paradox is considered in the context of four questions: (1) does Leontief have a “theory” at all; (2) to which theoretical school Leontief belongs or at least gravitates; (3) what is the main factor in the formation of the paradox under consideration; (4) what are the prospects for Leontief's approach in macroeconomics. To understand this paradox, it is proposed to use the terms introduced by G. Mankiw - an economist as a scientist and an economist as an engineer. It is concluded that there is still a gap between \"theory\" and \"engineering\" in economics. It is assumed that such a gap, including in connection with the rapid growth of a large amount of economic data and universal digitalization, may gradually decrease.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Second Leontief Paradox: Economic Theory or Economic Engineering?\",\"authors\":\"U. A. Parkhimenka\",\"doi\":\"10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-84-102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the situation, conventionally called the \\\"Second Leontief Paradox\\\", when a recognized scientist, Nobel laureate and undisputed authority in the academic environment, it turns out, has practically no place in modern economic theory - neither within the \\\"mainstream\\\" nor in unorthodox directions. This paradox is considered in the context of four questions: (1) does Leontief have a “theory” at all; (2) to which theoretical school Leontief belongs or at least gravitates; (3) what is the main factor in the formation of the paradox under consideration; (4) what are the prospects for Leontief's approach in macroeconomics. To understand this paradox, it is proposed to use the terms introduced by G. Mankiw - an economist as a scientist and an economist as an engineer. It is concluded that there is still a gap between \\\"theory\\\" and \\\"engineering\\\" in economics. It is assumed that such a gap, including in connection with the rapid growth of a large amount of economic data and universal digitalization, may gradually decrease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-84-102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-84-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章分析了被称为 "第二个列昂惕夫悖论 "的情况,即一位公认的科学家、诺贝尔奖获得者和学术界无可争议的权威,竟然在现代经济理论中几乎没有一席之地--既不属于 "主流",也不属于非正统的方向。我们将从以下四个问题来探讨这一悖论:(1) 列昂惕夫到底有没有 "理论";(2) 列昂惕夫属于或至少倾向于哪个理论流派;(3) 形成当前悖论的主要因素是什么;(4) 列昂惕夫的方法在宏观经济学中的前景如何。为了理解这一悖论,建议使用 G. Mankiw 提出的术语--作为科学家的经济学家和作为工程师的经济学家。结论是,经济学中的 "理论 "与 "工程 "之间仍然存在差距。我们认为,随着大量经济数据的快速增长和数字化的普及,这种差距可能会逐渐缩小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Second Leontief Paradox: Economic Theory or Economic Engineering?
The article analyzes the situation, conventionally called the "Second Leontief Paradox", when a recognized scientist, Nobel laureate and undisputed authority in the academic environment, it turns out, has practically no place in modern economic theory - neither within the "mainstream" nor in unorthodox directions. This paradox is considered in the context of four questions: (1) does Leontief have a “theory” at all; (2) to which theoretical school Leontief belongs or at least gravitates; (3) what is the main factor in the formation of the paradox under consideration; (4) what are the prospects for Leontief's approach in macroeconomics. To understand this paradox, it is proposed to use the terms introduced by G. Mankiw - an economist as a scientist and an economist as an engineer. It is concluded that there is still a gap between "theory" and "engineering" in economics. It is assumed that such a gap, including in connection with the rapid growth of a large amount of economic data and universal digitalization, may gradually decrease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信