检测中国生态恢复力的区域不均衡性及其影响因素

Han Hu, Kegao Yan, Houbao Fan, Tiangui Lv, Xinmin Zhang
{"title":"检测中国生态恢复力的区域不均衡性及其影响因素","authors":"Han Hu, Kegao Yan, Houbao Fan, Tiangui Lv, Xinmin Zhang","doi":"10.1177/0958305x241230619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing research on the state transition process of ecological resilience (ER) has neglected the ultimate goal of enhancing well-being and lacks theoretical framework support. To address these issues, we have innovatively developed a three-dimensional analysis framework of “resistant, absorptive, and restorative capacity” to measure ER. We also explored the regional unevenness and factors influencing ER at the provincial level in China through spatiotemporal evolution analysis and GeoDetector models. The results indicate that: the ecological resilience of Chinese provinces ranges from 0.415 to 0.596, with all provinces falling into the risk or good areas. Furthermore, a fluctuating and increasing trend is observed. The eastern coastal provinces, such as Beijing and Shandong, comprise predominantly good areas of ecological resilience that are distributed in a band manner, while the western provinces, notably Xinjiang, comprise primarily risk areas distributed in a clustered pattern. The per capita electricity consumption, per capita GDP, and patent applications in high-tech industries are identified as the primary factors influencing the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecological resilience, and the interaction effects of each factor have synergistic enhancement effects. Spatial ecological resilience displays certain degrees of “nonhomogeneous” agglomeration and spatial heterogeneity. However, no apparent spatial polarization phenomenon is observed. These findings provide valuable insights for cities aiming to address ecological risks and enhance urban resilience.","PeriodicalId":505265,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"15 1-2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting regional unevenness and influencing factors of ecological resilience in China\",\"authors\":\"Han Hu, Kegao Yan, Houbao Fan, Tiangui Lv, Xinmin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0958305x241230619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing research on the state transition process of ecological resilience (ER) has neglected the ultimate goal of enhancing well-being and lacks theoretical framework support. To address these issues, we have innovatively developed a three-dimensional analysis framework of “resistant, absorptive, and restorative capacity” to measure ER. We also explored the regional unevenness and factors influencing ER at the provincial level in China through spatiotemporal evolution analysis and GeoDetector models. The results indicate that: the ecological resilience of Chinese provinces ranges from 0.415 to 0.596, with all provinces falling into the risk or good areas. Furthermore, a fluctuating and increasing trend is observed. The eastern coastal provinces, such as Beijing and Shandong, comprise predominantly good areas of ecological resilience that are distributed in a band manner, while the western provinces, notably Xinjiang, comprise primarily risk areas distributed in a clustered pattern. The per capita electricity consumption, per capita GDP, and patent applications in high-tech industries are identified as the primary factors influencing the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecological resilience, and the interaction effects of each factor have synergistic enhancement effects. Spatial ecological resilience displays certain degrees of “nonhomogeneous” agglomeration and spatial heterogeneity. However, no apparent spatial polarization phenomenon is observed. These findings provide valuable insights for cities aiming to address ecological risks and enhance urban resilience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"volume\":\"15 1-2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x241230619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x241230619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有关于生态复原力(ER)状态转换过程的研究忽视了提高福祉这一最终目标,也缺乏理论框架的支持。针对这些问题,我们创新性地提出了 "抵御能力、吸收能力、恢复能力 "三维分析框架来衡量ER。我们还通过时空演变分析和 GeoDetector 模型,探讨了中国省级地区的区域不平衡性及其影响因素。结果表明:中国各省的生态恢复力在 0.415 至 0.596 之间,所有省份均属于风险区或良好区。此外,还呈现出波动和上升的趋势。东部沿海省份,如北京和山东,主要由生态恢复力良好区组成,呈带状分布;而西部省份,尤其是新疆,主要由风险区组成,呈集群分布。人均用电量、人均 GDP 和高新技术产业专利申请量被认为是影响生态恢复力时空异质性的主要因素,各因素的交互作用具有协同增强效应。空间生态复原力表现出一定程度的 "非均质 "聚集和空间异质性。但是,没有观察到明显的空间极化现象。这些发现为城市应对生态风险、增强城市复原力提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting regional unevenness and influencing factors of ecological resilience in China
Existing research on the state transition process of ecological resilience (ER) has neglected the ultimate goal of enhancing well-being and lacks theoretical framework support. To address these issues, we have innovatively developed a three-dimensional analysis framework of “resistant, absorptive, and restorative capacity” to measure ER. We also explored the regional unevenness and factors influencing ER at the provincial level in China through spatiotemporal evolution analysis and GeoDetector models. The results indicate that: the ecological resilience of Chinese provinces ranges from 0.415 to 0.596, with all provinces falling into the risk or good areas. Furthermore, a fluctuating and increasing trend is observed. The eastern coastal provinces, such as Beijing and Shandong, comprise predominantly good areas of ecological resilience that are distributed in a band manner, while the western provinces, notably Xinjiang, comprise primarily risk areas distributed in a clustered pattern. The per capita electricity consumption, per capita GDP, and patent applications in high-tech industries are identified as the primary factors influencing the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecological resilience, and the interaction effects of each factor have synergistic enhancement effects. Spatial ecological resilience displays certain degrees of “nonhomogeneous” agglomeration and spatial heterogeneity. However, no apparent spatial polarization phenomenon is observed. These findings provide valuable insights for cities aiming to address ecological risks and enhance urban resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信