良性颅内高压症病例中光学相干断层扫描神经节细胞层分析与视野的相关性

Elham Abdullah Elsheraiy Saad, Tarek Ragaey Mohammed, Rabab Mohammed El Soht, Tamer I Abdelhalim
{"title":"良性颅内高压症病例中光学相干断层扫描神经节细胞层分析与视野的相关性","authors":"Elham Abdullah Elsheraiy Saad, Tarek Ragaey Mohammed, Rabab Mohammed El Soht, Tamer I Abdelhalim","doi":"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i25366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) is a condition in which there is excessive cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pressure in the subarachnoid space that surrounds the brain and spinal cord (intracranial pressure (ICP)) owing to an unexplained cause. It affects 1:100,000 persons yearly with a 20 times greater prevalence in young, obese girls. We wanted to correlate between optical coherence tomography ganglion cell layer analyses and visual field in patients of benign intracranial hypertension. \nMethods: This cross-sectional clinical study that was carried out on 30 patients (60 eyes) who all had a recently diagnosed papilledema due to first episode of IIH. Goal of the study, and applied tests was done before obtaining an informed consent. Personal history, past medical and ocular history, possible risk factors for IIH were taken. Full ophthalmological examination including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), color perception, pupillary reflexes, slit lamp bio microscopy examination including assessment of papilledema grade, blood pressure check and body mass index (BMI). All patients underwent automated perimetry in dim light to evaluate their visual field using SITA fast Standard 30-2 protocol by Humphrey Field Analyzer (Humphrey Field Analyzer I Carl Zeiss AG – Oberkochen – Germany). \nResults: Average RNFL thickness had significant positive correlation with rim area (r=0.654, P<0.001) and disc area (r=0.665, P<0.001). Average RNFL thickness had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. \n Average GCL complex had significant negative correlation with rim area (r= -0.283, P=0.028) and disc area (r= -0.328, P=0.01). Average GCL complex had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. Minimum GCL complex had significant negative correlation with rim area (r= -0.272, P=0.036) and disc area (r= -0.315, P=0.014). Minimum GCL complex had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. Papilledema grading had significant positive correlation with average RNFL thickness (r=0.461, P<0.001). Papilledema grading had no correlation with average GCL complex, minimum GCL complex, VFI, MD and PSD. \nConclusions: There is a strong structure-function link between visual field indices and OCT parameters such as RNFL and GCC.","PeriodicalId":506708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","volume":"37 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell Layer Analysis and Visual Field in Cases of Benign Intracranial Hypertension\",\"authors\":\"Elham Abdullah Elsheraiy Saad, Tarek Ragaey Mohammed, Rabab Mohammed El Soht, Tamer I Abdelhalim\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i25366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) is a condition in which there is excessive cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pressure in the subarachnoid space that surrounds the brain and spinal cord (intracranial pressure (ICP)) owing to an unexplained cause. It affects 1:100,000 persons yearly with a 20 times greater prevalence in young, obese girls. We wanted to correlate between optical coherence tomography ganglion cell layer analyses and visual field in patients of benign intracranial hypertension. \\nMethods: This cross-sectional clinical study that was carried out on 30 patients (60 eyes) who all had a recently diagnosed papilledema due to first episode of IIH. Goal of the study, and applied tests was done before obtaining an informed consent. Personal history, past medical and ocular history, possible risk factors for IIH were taken. Full ophthalmological examination including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), color perception, pupillary reflexes, slit lamp bio microscopy examination including assessment of papilledema grade, blood pressure check and body mass index (BMI). All patients underwent automated perimetry in dim light to evaluate their visual field using SITA fast Standard 30-2 protocol by Humphrey Field Analyzer (Humphrey Field Analyzer I Carl Zeiss AG – Oberkochen – Germany). \\nResults: Average RNFL thickness had significant positive correlation with rim area (r=0.654, P<0.001) and disc area (r=0.665, P<0.001). Average RNFL thickness had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. \\n Average GCL complex had significant negative correlation with rim area (r= -0.283, P=0.028) and disc area (r= -0.328, P=0.01). Average GCL complex had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. Minimum GCL complex had significant negative correlation with rim area (r= -0.272, P=0.036) and disc area (r= -0.315, P=0.014). Minimum GCL complex had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. Papilledema grading had significant positive correlation with average RNFL thickness (r=0.461, P<0.001). Papilledema grading had no correlation with average GCL complex, minimum GCL complex, VFI, MD and PSD. \\nConclusions: There is a strong structure-function link between visual field indices and OCT parameters such as RNFL and GCC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"37 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i25366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2024/v36i25366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:良性颅内高压症(BIH)是指由于不明原因导致环绕大脑和脊髓的蛛网膜下腔中的脑脊液(CSF)压力过高(ICP)。这种疾病每年的发病率为 1:100,000,而年轻肥胖女孩的发病率要高出 20 倍。我们希望将光学相干断层扫描神经节细胞层分析与良性颅内高压患者的视野相关联。研究方法这项横断面临床研究的对象是 30 名患者(60 只眼),他们都因首次颅内高压发作而在最近被诊断为乳头水肿。在获得知情同意之前,先进行研究目标和应用测试。了解个人病史、既往病史和眼科病史,以及 IIH 可能的危险因素。全面的眼科检查包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压(IOP)、色觉、瞳孔反射、裂隙灯生物显微镜检查(包括乳头水肿等级评估)、血压检查和体重指数(BMI)。所有患者都在昏暗的光线下接受了自动周边测量,通过汉弗莱视野分析仪(Humphrey Field Analyzer I Carl Zeiss AG - Oberkochen - Germany)使用 SITA 快速标准 30-2 方案评估视野。结果平均 RNFL 厚度与边缘面积(r=0.654,P<0.001)和视盘面积(r=0.665,P<0.001)呈显著正相关。平均 RNFL 厚度与视力、眼压和平均 CD 没有相关性。 平均 GCL 复层与边缘面积(r= -0.283,P=0.028)和视盘面积(r= -0.328,P=0.01)呈显著负相关。平均 GCL 复合物与 VA、IOP 和平均 CD 没有相关性。最小 GCL 复合物与边缘面积(r= -0.272,P=0.036)和视盘面积(r= -0.315,P=0.014)呈显著负相关。最小 GCL 复合物与 VA、IOP 和平均 CD 没有相关性。乳头水肿分级与平均 RNFL 厚度呈显著正相关(r=0.461,P<0.001)。乳头水肿分级与平均 GCL 复层、最小 GCL 复层、VFI、MD 和 PSD 无关。结论视野指数和 OCT 参数(如 RNFL 和 GCC)之间存在紧密的结构-功能联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between Optical Coherence Tomography Ganglion Cell Layer Analysis and Visual Field in Cases of Benign Intracranial Hypertension
Background: Benign intracranial hypertension (BIH) is a condition in which there is excessive cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pressure in the subarachnoid space that surrounds the brain and spinal cord (intracranial pressure (ICP)) owing to an unexplained cause. It affects 1:100,000 persons yearly with a 20 times greater prevalence in young, obese girls. We wanted to correlate between optical coherence tomography ganglion cell layer analyses and visual field in patients of benign intracranial hypertension. Methods: This cross-sectional clinical study that was carried out on 30 patients (60 eyes) who all had a recently diagnosed papilledema due to first episode of IIH. Goal of the study, and applied tests was done before obtaining an informed consent. Personal history, past medical and ocular history, possible risk factors for IIH were taken. Full ophthalmological examination including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), color perception, pupillary reflexes, slit lamp bio microscopy examination including assessment of papilledema grade, blood pressure check and body mass index (BMI). All patients underwent automated perimetry in dim light to evaluate their visual field using SITA fast Standard 30-2 protocol by Humphrey Field Analyzer (Humphrey Field Analyzer I Carl Zeiss AG – Oberkochen – Germany). Results: Average RNFL thickness had significant positive correlation with rim area (r=0.654, P<0.001) and disc area (r=0.665, P<0.001). Average RNFL thickness had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD.  Average GCL complex had significant negative correlation with rim area (r= -0.283, P=0.028) and disc area (r= -0.328, P=0.01). Average GCL complex had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. Minimum GCL complex had significant negative correlation with rim area (r= -0.272, P=0.036) and disc area (r= -0.315, P=0.014). Minimum GCL complex had no correlation with VA, IOP and average CD. Papilledema grading had significant positive correlation with average RNFL thickness (r=0.461, P<0.001). Papilledema grading had no correlation with average GCL complex, minimum GCL complex, VFI, MD and PSD. Conclusions: There is a strong structure-function link between visual field indices and OCT parameters such as RNFL and GCC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信