人,还是财产?脑机接口技术与法律

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Lachlan Robb, Scott D. Kiel-Chisholm
{"title":"人,还是财产?脑机接口技术与法律","authors":"Lachlan Robb, Scott D. Kiel-Chisholm","doi":"10.1177/1037969x241233349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions of robotics and the law are often limited to ‘what technology harms humans’, rather than considering what it means when ‘humans harm technology’. This article looks to advancements of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology to argue how this can be an extension of individuals and therefore causes complicated legal questions that are yet to be resolved. This article identifies the law and explains BCI technology within the context of Australian criminal, property, negligence, personal injury and civil procedure laws. These areas of law need to be read with a clearer understanding of the way that technology is advancing. Currently these areas are not sufficiently prepared to respond to questions of BCI technology and where the human body begins and ends.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Person, or property? Brain-Computer Interface technology and the law\",\"authors\":\"Lachlan Robb, Scott D. Kiel-Chisholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969x241233349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussions of robotics and the law are often limited to ‘what technology harms humans’, rather than considering what it means when ‘humans harm technology’. This article looks to advancements of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology to argue how this can be an extension of individuals and therefore causes complicated legal questions that are yet to be resolved. This article identifies the law and explains BCI technology within the context of Australian criminal, property, negligence, personal injury and civil procedure laws. These areas of law need to be read with a clearer understanding of the way that technology is advancing. Currently these areas are not sufficiently prepared to respond to questions of BCI technology and where the human body begins and ends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241233349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241233349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于机器人技术和法律的讨论往往局限于 "什么技术会伤害人类",而不是考虑 "人类伤害技术 "意味着什么。本文着眼于脑机接口(BCI)技术的进步,论证该技术如何成为个人的延伸,并因此引发复杂的法律问题,这些问题尚待解决。本文在澳大利亚刑法、财产法、过失法、人身伤害法和民事诉讼法的背景下确定了法律并解释了 BCI 技术。在解读这些法律领域时,需要更清楚地了解技术发展的方式。目前,这些领域还没有做好充分准备,以应对生物识别技术以及人体的起点和终点等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Person, or property? Brain-Computer Interface technology and the law
Discussions of robotics and the law are often limited to ‘what technology harms humans’, rather than considering what it means when ‘humans harm technology’. This article looks to advancements of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology to argue how this can be an extension of individuals and therefore causes complicated legal questions that are yet to be resolved. This article identifies the law and explains BCI technology within the context of Australian criminal, property, negligence, personal injury and civil procedure laws. These areas of law need to be read with a clearer understanding of the way that technology is advancing. Currently these areas are not sufficiently prepared to respond to questions of BCI technology and where the human body begins and ends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信