评估外科病房住院病人使用解热镇痛药物的普遍程度

Roy R, Vivek B, Krishna Upadhye
{"title":"评估外科病房住院病人使用解热镇痛药物的普遍程度","authors":"Roy R, Vivek B, Krishna Upadhye","doi":"10.36713/epra15813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antisecretory medicines are often administered to patients in hospitals. However, there is currently limited knowledge on the comprehensive utilization of these treatments in the hospital environment.\nAim: To assess the suitability of Antisecretory treatment in a major educational medical facility in western India, and the consequences of hospital prescriptions in primary care.\nMethods: The administration of antisecretory drugs was observed for a duration of one month in adult patients who were sequentially admitted to K.J Somaiya Medical College and Hospital. This was done by examining their medical records. \nResults: Out of the 800 patients that were admitted to the hospital, 46.8% of them were prescribed Antisecretory treatment. Ranitidine had the highest usage rate at 44.4%, followed by pantoprazole at 31.8% and omeprazole at 23.0%. Stress ulcer prophylaxis and prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcer were the reasons for usage in 60.4% of cases. In all, 68% of prescriptions were deemed inappropriate based on consensus evaluation. Among patients who received unneeded preventive medication during their hospital stay, 56.4% were released while still on therapy, and 46% continued to receive the treatment three months later. \nConclusions: There is excessive utilization of Antisecretory medications in patients who are admitted to the hospital. The majority of incorrect hospital prescriptions are to the administration of ulcer prevention in patients who have a low risk of developing ulcers. This over utilization may also encourage improper medication usage in the field of general medicine.\nKEYWORDS: Antisecretory medication, H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), proton pump inhibitors, Hospital","PeriodicalId":114964,"journal":{"name":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","volume":"400 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TO EVALUATE THE PREVALENCE OF ANTISECRETORY MEDICATION USE AMONG HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN SURGERY WARD\",\"authors\":\"Roy R, Vivek B, Krishna Upadhye\",\"doi\":\"10.36713/epra15813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Antisecretory medicines are often administered to patients in hospitals. However, there is currently limited knowledge on the comprehensive utilization of these treatments in the hospital environment.\\nAim: To assess the suitability of Antisecretory treatment in a major educational medical facility in western India, and the consequences of hospital prescriptions in primary care.\\nMethods: The administration of antisecretory drugs was observed for a duration of one month in adult patients who were sequentially admitted to K.J Somaiya Medical College and Hospital. This was done by examining their medical records. \\nResults: Out of the 800 patients that were admitted to the hospital, 46.8% of them were prescribed Antisecretory treatment. Ranitidine had the highest usage rate at 44.4%, followed by pantoprazole at 31.8% and omeprazole at 23.0%. Stress ulcer prophylaxis and prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcer were the reasons for usage in 60.4% of cases. In all, 68% of prescriptions were deemed inappropriate based on consensus evaluation. Among patients who received unneeded preventive medication during their hospital stay, 56.4% were released while still on therapy, and 46% continued to receive the treatment three months later. \\nConclusions: There is excessive utilization of Antisecretory medications in patients who are admitted to the hospital. The majority of incorrect hospital prescriptions are to the administration of ulcer prevention in patients who have a low risk of developing ulcers. This over utilization may also encourage improper medication usage in the field of general medicine.\\nKEYWORDS: Antisecretory medication, H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), proton pump inhibitors, Hospital\",\"PeriodicalId\":114964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)\",\"volume\":\"400 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra15813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra15813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院通常会给病人使用退热药。目的:评估印度西部一家大型教育医疗机构的解热镇痛治疗的适宜性,以及医院处方在初级保健中的后果:方法:对 K.J Somaiya 医学院和医院先后收治的成年患者进行为期一个月的解热镇痛药物用药观察。方法:观察 K.J Somaiya 医学院和医院先后收治的成年患者在一个月内的抗抑郁药物用药情况,并检查他们的病历。结果如下在该医院收治的 800 名患者中,46.8% 的患者接受了抗呕吐治疗。使用率最高的是雷尼替丁,占 44.4%,其次是泮托拉唑,占 31.8%,奥美拉唑占 23.0%。预防应激性溃疡和预防非甾体类抗炎药引起的溃疡是 60.4%的病例使用处方的原因。根据共识评估,共有 68% 的处方被认为是不恰当的。在住院期间接受了不需要的预防性药物治疗的患者中,56.4%在出院时仍在接受治疗,46%在三个月后继续接受治疗。结论:入院患者过度使用抗抑郁药物。大多数错误的住院处方都是为了给溃疡风险较低的患者服用预防溃疡的药物。这种过度使用也可能会助长全科医学领域的用药不当。关键词:抗溃疡药物、H2-受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)、质子泵抑制剂、医院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TO EVALUATE THE PREVALENCE OF ANTISECRETORY MEDICATION USE AMONG HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS IN SURGERY WARD
Antisecretory medicines are often administered to patients in hospitals. However, there is currently limited knowledge on the comprehensive utilization of these treatments in the hospital environment. Aim: To assess the suitability of Antisecretory treatment in a major educational medical facility in western India, and the consequences of hospital prescriptions in primary care. Methods: The administration of antisecretory drugs was observed for a duration of one month in adult patients who were sequentially admitted to K.J Somaiya Medical College and Hospital. This was done by examining their medical records. Results: Out of the 800 patients that were admitted to the hospital, 46.8% of them were prescribed Antisecretory treatment. Ranitidine had the highest usage rate at 44.4%, followed by pantoprazole at 31.8% and omeprazole at 23.0%. Stress ulcer prophylaxis and prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcer were the reasons for usage in 60.4% of cases. In all, 68% of prescriptions were deemed inappropriate based on consensus evaluation. Among patients who received unneeded preventive medication during their hospital stay, 56.4% were released while still on therapy, and 46% continued to receive the treatment three months later. Conclusions: There is excessive utilization of Antisecretory medications in patients who are admitted to the hospital. The majority of incorrect hospital prescriptions are to the administration of ulcer prevention in patients who have a low risk of developing ulcers. This over utilization may also encourage improper medication usage in the field of general medicine. KEYWORDS: Antisecretory medication, H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), proton pump inhibitors, Hospital
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信