推进心脏病学的远程医疗:全面回顾大流行后不断发展的实践和成果

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Katherine Huerne MSc , Mark J. Eisenberg MD
{"title":"推进心脏病学的远程医疗:全面回顾大流行后不断发展的实践和成果","authors":"Katherine Huerne MSc ,&nbsp;Mark J. Eisenberg MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Telemedicine, telehealth, e-Health, and other related terms refer to the exchange of medical information or medical care from one site to another through electronic communication between a patient and a health care provider. As telemedicine infrastructure has changed since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this review provides an overview of telemedicine use and effectiveness in cardiology, with emphasis on coronary artery disease in the postpandemic context. Prepandemic studies tend to report statistically insignificant or modest improvements in cardiovascular disease outcome from telemedicine use to usual care. In contrast, postpandemic studies tend to report positive outcomes or comparable acceptance of telemedicine use to usual care. Today, telemedicine can effectively replace in person follow-up visits to produce comparable (but not necessarily superior) outcomes in cardiovascular disease management. A benefit of telemedicine is the potential reduction in follow-up time or time to intervention, which may lead to earlier detection and prevention of adverse events. Nonetheless, barriers remain to effective telemedicine implementation in the postpandemic context. Ensuring accessible and user-friendly telemedicine devices, maintaining adherence to remote rehabilitation procedures, and normalizing use of telemedicine in routine follow-up visits are examples. Current knowledge gaps include the true economic cost of telemedicine infrastructure, feasibility of use in specific cardiology contexts, and sex/gender differences in telemedicine use. Future telemedicine developments will need to address these concerns before acceptance of telemedicine as the new standard of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 96-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000082/pdfft?md5=b76f576bf2feff9b5c307285d229cae7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693624000082-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Huerne MSc ,&nbsp;Mark J. Eisenberg MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Telemedicine, telehealth, e-Health, and other related terms refer to the exchange of medical information or medical care from one site to another through electronic communication between a patient and a health care provider. As telemedicine infrastructure has changed since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this review provides an overview of telemedicine use and effectiveness in cardiology, with emphasis on coronary artery disease in the postpandemic context. Prepandemic studies tend to report statistically insignificant or modest improvements in cardiovascular disease outcome from telemedicine use to usual care. In contrast, postpandemic studies tend to report positive outcomes or comparable acceptance of telemedicine use to usual care. Today, telemedicine can effectively replace in person follow-up visits to produce comparable (but not necessarily superior) outcomes in cardiovascular disease management. A benefit of telemedicine is the potential reduction in follow-up time or time to intervention, which may lead to earlier detection and prevention of adverse events. Nonetheless, barriers remain to effective telemedicine implementation in the postpandemic context. Ensuring accessible and user-friendly telemedicine devices, maintaining adherence to remote rehabilitation procedures, and normalizing use of telemedicine in routine follow-up visits are examples. Current knowledge gaps include the true economic cost of telemedicine infrastructure, feasibility of use in specific cardiology contexts, and sex/gender differences in telemedicine use. Future telemedicine developments will need to address these concerns before acceptance of telemedicine as the new standard of care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 96-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000082/pdfft?md5=b76f576bf2feff9b5c307285d229cae7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693624000082-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

远程医疗、远程保健、电子健康和其他相关术语是指患者和医疗服务提供者之间通过电子通信从一个站点到另一个站点交换医疗信息或医疗服务。自 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行以来,远程医疗基础设施发生了变化,因此本综述概述了远程医疗在心脏病学中的应用和效果,重点是大流行后冠状动脉疾病。大流行前的研究倾向于报告使用远程医疗与常规护理相比,对心血管疾病结果的改善在统计学上不明显或有限。与此相反,流行后的研究则倾向于报告使用远程医疗对心血管疾病产生的积极疗效或接受度与常规治疗相当。如今,远程医疗可以有效取代亲自随访,在心血管疾病管理方面产生类似(但不一定更好)的结果。远程医疗的一个好处是可能缩短随访时间或干预时间,从而更早地发现和预防不良事件的发生。然而,在疫后环境中有效实施远程医疗仍存在障碍。例如,确保远程医疗设备的可及性和用户友好性、坚持远程康复程序以及在常规随访中正常使用远程医疗。目前的知识空白包括远程医疗基础设施的真实经济成本、在特定心脏病学环境中使用的可行性以及远程医疗使用中的性别差异。未来远程医疗的发展需要解决这些问题,然后才能接受远程医疗作为新的医疗标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context

Telemedicine, telehealth, e-Health, and other related terms refer to the exchange of medical information or medical care from one site to another through electronic communication between a patient and a health care provider. As telemedicine infrastructure has changed since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this review provides an overview of telemedicine use and effectiveness in cardiology, with emphasis on coronary artery disease in the postpandemic context. Prepandemic studies tend to report statistically insignificant or modest improvements in cardiovascular disease outcome from telemedicine use to usual care. In contrast, postpandemic studies tend to report positive outcomes or comparable acceptance of telemedicine use to usual care. Today, telemedicine can effectively replace in person follow-up visits to produce comparable (but not necessarily superior) outcomes in cardiovascular disease management. A benefit of telemedicine is the potential reduction in follow-up time or time to intervention, which may lead to earlier detection and prevention of adverse events. Nonetheless, barriers remain to effective telemedicine implementation in the postpandemic context. Ensuring accessible and user-friendly telemedicine devices, maintaining adherence to remote rehabilitation procedures, and normalizing use of telemedicine in routine follow-up visits are examples. Current knowledge gaps include the true economic cost of telemedicine infrastructure, feasibility of use in specific cardiology contexts, and sex/gender differences in telemedicine use. Future telemedicine developments will need to address these concerns before acceptance of telemedicine as the new standard of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信