{"title":"作为诺曼底原始宪法的《罗洛法》:十七和十八世纪法国法律史的书写与重写","authors":"Gilduin Davy","doi":"10.1093/ehr/cead178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The laws of Rollo are regularly evoked in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Norman historiography. As a result of a renaissance of interest in, and the study of, medieval Norman sources, notably the gestae of Dudo of Saint-Quentin and Guillaume of Jumièges, early modern jurists and historians located the legal particularism of Normandy in Rollo’s laws. They exploited these sources in order to preserve Norman rights and liberties and to use the history of their medieval origins to justify ongoing legal provincialism. But as the Revolution approached, the memory of Rollo’s laws also became an essential issue in emerging political and ideological debates, because they served as much to defend absolute monarchy as to challenge it.","PeriodicalId":184998,"journal":{"name":"The English Historical Review","volume":"646 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Laws of Rollo as a Primitive Constitution for Normandy: Writing and Rewriting Legal History in France during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries\",\"authors\":\"Gilduin Davy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehr/cead178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The laws of Rollo are regularly evoked in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Norman historiography. As a result of a renaissance of interest in, and the study of, medieval Norman sources, notably the gestae of Dudo of Saint-Quentin and Guillaume of Jumièges, early modern jurists and historians located the legal particularism of Normandy in Rollo’s laws. They exploited these sources in order to preserve Norman rights and liberties and to use the history of their medieval origins to justify ongoing legal provincialism. But as the Revolution approached, the memory of Rollo’s laws also became an essential issue in emerging political and ideological debates, because they served as much to defend absolute monarchy as to challenge it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The English Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"646 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The English Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cead178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The English Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cead178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
十七和十八世纪的诺曼史学中经常提到罗洛的法律。由于对中世纪诺曼资料的兴趣和研究的复兴,特别是对圣昆廷的杜多(Dudo of Saint-Quentin)和朱米热的纪尧姆(Guillaume of Jumièges)的 gestae 的研究,早期现代法学家和历史学家将诺曼底的法律特殊性归结为罗尔洛的法律。他们利用这些渊源来维护诺曼底人的权利和自由,并利用其中世纪起源的历史来为正在进行的法律省籍主义辩护。但随着大革命的临近,对罗洛法律的记忆也成为新出现的政治和意识形态辩论中的一个重要问题,因为这些法律既是对绝对君主制的捍卫,也是对其的挑战。
The Laws of Rollo as a Primitive Constitution for Normandy: Writing and Rewriting Legal History in France during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries
The laws of Rollo are regularly evoked in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Norman historiography. As a result of a renaissance of interest in, and the study of, medieval Norman sources, notably the gestae of Dudo of Saint-Quentin and Guillaume of Jumièges, early modern jurists and historians located the legal particularism of Normandy in Rollo’s laws. They exploited these sources in order to preserve Norman rights and liberties and to use the history of their medieval origins to justify ongoing legal provincialism. But as the Revolution approached, the memory of Rollo’s laws also became an essential issue in emerging political and ideological debates, because they served as much to defend absolute monarchy as to challenge it.