雪佛龙运用非常规思维,尝试将页岩气采收作为标准处理方法

Stephen Rassenfoss
{"title":"雪佛龙运用非常规思维,尝试将页岩气采收作为标准处理方法","authors":"Stephen Rassenfoss","doi":"10.2118/0224-0024-jpt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the shale business, the closest thing now to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is improved techniques.\n During an earnings call last November an analyst asked EOG Resources executives about their enhanced completion technique which EOG reported was adding 20% to first-year well production in the Permian.\n Improved completions have allowed operators to significantly increase early production year after year, but after that, steep declines are a given.\n Back in 2016, EOG was talking about how it was increasing oil production significantly by injecting millions of cubic feet of gas a day into wells in the Eagle Ford. It triggered an EOR field-testing boom by competitors hoping to match reported reserve increases of “30 to 70%.”\n In a 2017 JPT story, Deepak Devegowda, a petroleum engineering professor at the University of Oklahoma, said, “This is the name of the game. Everybody is talking about EOR and pumping money into trials of EOR.”\n Now the only mention of the acronym EOR on EOG’s website is an item in its corporate history timeline for 2016: “We commercialized the first enhanced oil recovery process, or EOR, in shale.”\n In recent years, reported shale EOR work has been mostly in the form of occasional papers describing production uplift by companies selling ways to increase production by injecting gas or chemicals.\n EOR effectiveness isn’t the issue, according to Todd Hoffman, a petroleum engineering professor at Montana Tech University who wrote two papers evaluating EOG’s methods cited in two Chevron papers.\n “The EOG field work showed us that these projects can produce significant additional oil and be economically positive,” he said. The problem is that drilling and fracturing wells delivers “higher economic returns than the EOG-style EOR projects with the huge compressors, high gas rates, and high injection pressures.”\n Last year in the middle of this EOR drought, Chevron did something different. It delivered two papers revealing a major company-scale effort to find ways to use chemical and gas injections to economically produce more oil.\n The papers presented at the 2023 Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) reported on field tests of surfactants and natural gas injection on Permian Basin wells which delivered sufficiently encouraging results to justify an expanded testing program. (URTeC 3870505 and URTeC 3871386).\n Chevron described a systematic effort by its corporate technical unit and its Mid-Continent business unit to rethink shale EOR methods based on the unconventional nature of flow through fractured reservoirs and the economic realities in a business where new EOR technology is competing with the profitable status quo.\n Its methods challenge accepted notions about the role of EOR. In SPE’s disciplines, EOR normally falls under the production topic, “marginal aging fields.” What Chevron tested is better described by the topic, “well interventions.”\n Rather than looking at these techniques as a way to eke out the last barrels from old wells, the papers describe methods that can be deployed earlier in the life of these short-lived wells.","PeriodicalId":16720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","volume":"42 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chevron Applies Some Unconventional Thinking To Try To Make Shale EOR a Standard Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Rassenfoss\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/0224-0024-jpt\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the shale business, the closest thing now to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is improved techniques.\\n During an earnings call last November an analyst asked EOG Resources executives about their enhanced completion technique which EOG reported was adding 20% to first-year well production in the Permian.\\n Improved completions have allowed operators to significantly increase early production year after year, but after that, steep declines are a given.\\n Back in 2016, EOG was talking about how it was increasing oil production significantly by injecting millions of cubic feet of gas a day into wells in the Eagle Ford. It triggered an EOR field-testing boom by competitors hoping to match reported reserve increases of “30 to 70%.”\\n In a 2017 JPT story, Deepak Devegowda, a petroleum engineering professor at the University of Oklahoma, said, “This is the name of the game. Everybody is talking about EOR and pumping money into trials of EOR.”\\n Now the only mention of the acronym EOR on EOG’s website is an item in its corporate history timeline for 2016: “We commercialized the first enhanced oil recovery process, or EOR, in shale.”\\n In recent years, reported shale EOR work has been mostly in the form of occasional papers describing production uplift by companies selling ways to increase production by injecting gas or chemicals.\\n EOR effectiveness isn’t the issue, according to Todd Hoffman, a petroleum engineering professor at Montana Tech University who wrote two papers evaluating EOG’s methods cited in two Chevron papers.\\n “The EOG field work showed us that these projects can produce significant additional oil and be economically positive,” he said. The problem is that drilling and fracturing wells delivers “higher economic returns than the EOG-style EOR projects with the huge compressors, high gas rates, and high injection pressures.”\\n Last year in the middle of this EOR drought, Chevron did something different. It delivered two papers revealing a major company-scale effort to find ways to use chemical and gas injections to economically produce more oil.\\n The papers presented at the 2023 Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) reported on field tests of surfactants and natural gas injection on Permian Basin wells which delivered sufficiently encouraging results to justify an expanded testing program. (URTeC 3870505 and URTeC 3871386).\\n Chevron described a systematic effort by its corporate technical unit and its Mid-Continent business unit to rethink shale EOR methods based on the unconventional nature of flow through fractured reservoirs and the economic realities in a business where new EOR technology is competing with the profitable status quo.\\n Its methods challenge accepted notions about the role of EOR. In SPE’s disciplines, EOR normally falls under the production topic, “marginal aging fields.” What Chevron tested is better described by the topic, “well interventions.”\\n Rather than looking at these techniques as a way to eke out the last barrels from old wells, the papers describe methods that can be deployed earlier in the life of these short-lived wells.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Technology\",\"volume\":\"42 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/0224-0024-jpt\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/0224-0024-jpt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在页岩业务领域,目前最接近提高石油采收率(EOR)的是改进技术。在去年 11 月的一次收益电话会议上,一位分析师向 EOG 资源公司的高管询问了他们的提高完井技术,据 EOG 报告,该技术使二叠纪地区油井的首年产量提高了 20%。改进后的完井技术使运营商能够年复一年地大幅提高早期产量,但在此之后,产量急剧下降是必然的。早在 2016 年,EOG 就在谈论如何通过每天向鹰福特油井注入数百万立方英尺的天然气来大幅提高石油产量。这引发了竞争对手们的 EOR 现场试验热潮,希望能与所报道的储量增长 "30% 到 70%"相媲美。在 2017 年 JPT 的一篇报道中,俄克拉荷马大学石油工程教授 Deepak Devegowda 说:"这是游戏的名称。每个人都在谈论 EOR,都在为 EOR 试验投入资金。"现在,在 EOG 的网站上,唯一提到 EOR 缩写的是其 2016 年公司历史时间轴上的一项内容:"我们在页岩中首次商业化了强化采油工艺,即 EOR。"近年来,有关页岩 EOR 工作的报道大多以偶尔发表论文的形式出现,这些论文描述了一些公司通过注入天然气或化学品来提高产量的方法。蒙大拿理工大学石油工程教授托德-霍夫曼(Todd Hoffman)认为,EOR的有效性并不是问题所在,他撰写了两篇评估EOG方法的论文,被雪佛龙的两篇论文引用。"他说:"EOG 的现场工作向我们表明,这些项目可以生产出大量额外的石油,并具有良好的经济效益。问题是,钻井和压裂井所带来的 "经济回报要高于拥有巨大压缩机、高瓦斯率和高注入压力的 EOG 式 EOR 项目"。去年,在这场 EOR 旱灾中,雪佛龙做了一件与众不同的事。雪佛龙发表了两篇论文,揭示了公司为寻找利用化学和气体注入经济地生产更多石油的方法而做出的重大努力。这两篇在 2023 年非常规资源技术大会(URTeC)上发表的论文报告了对二叠纪盆地油井进行表面活性剂和天然气注入的现场测试,测试结果令人鼓舞,足以证明扩大测试计划是正确的。(URTeC 3870505 和 URTeC 3871386)。雪佛龙公司描述了其公司技术部门和中大陆业务部门为重新思考页岩 EOR 方法所做的系统性努力,这些努力的基础是流经裂缝储层的非常规性质,以及新 EOR 技术与盈利现状竞争的经济现实。其方法挑战了关于 EOR 作用的公认观念。在 SPE 的学科中,EOR 通常属于 "边际老化油田 "这一生产主题。雪佛龙公司所测试的技术更适合用 "油井干预 "这一主题来描述。与其将这些技术视为从老井中榨取最后一桶油的方法,这些论文描述了可以在这些寿命较短的油井的早期部署的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chevron Applies Some Unconventional Thinking To Try To Make Shale EOR a Standard Treatment
In the shale business, the closest thing now to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is improved techniques. During an earnings call last November an analyst asked EOG Resources executives about their enhanced completion technique which EOG reported was adding 20% to first-year well production in the Permian. Improved completions have allowed operators to significantly increase early production year after year, but after that, steep declines are a given. Back in 2016, EOG was talking about how it was increasing oil production significantly by injecting millions of cubic feet of gas a day into wells in the Eagle Ford. It triggered an EOR field-testing boom by competitors hoping to match reported reserve increases of “30 to 70%.” In a 2017 JPT story, Deepak Devegowda, a petroleum engineering professor at the University of Oklahoma, said, “This is the name of the game. Everybody is talking about EOR and pumping money into trials of EOR.” Now the only mention of the acronym EOR on EOG’s website is an item in its corporate history timeline for 2016: “We commercialized the first enhanced oil recovery process, or EOR, in shale.” In recent years, reported shale EOR work has been mostly in the form of occasional papers describing production uplift by companies selling ways to increase production by injecting gas or chemicals. EOR effectiveness isn’t the issue, according to Todd Hoffman, a petroleum engineering professor at Montana Tech University who wrote two papers evaluating EOG’s methods cited in two Chevron papers. “The EOG field work showed us that these projects can produce significant additional oil and be economically positive,” he said. The problem is that drilling and fracturing wells delivers “higher economic returns than the EOG-style EOR projects with the huge compressors, high gas rates, and high injection pressures.” Last year in the middle of this EOR drought, Chevron did something different. It delivered two papers revealing a major company-scale effort to find ways to use chemical and gas injections to economically produce more oil. The papers presented at the 2023 Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) reported on field tests of surfactants and natural gas injection on Permian Basin wells which delivered sufficiently encouraging results to justify an expanded testing program. (URTeC 3870505 and URTeC 3871386). Chevron described a systematic effort by its corporate technical unit and its Mid-Continent business unit to rethink shale EOR methods based on the unconventional nature of flow through fractured reservoirs and the economic realities in a business where new EOR technology is competing with the profitable status quo. Its methods challenge accepted notions about the role of EOR. In SPE’s disciplines, EOR normally falls under the production topic, “marginal aging fields.” What Chevron tested is better described by the topic, “well interventions.” Rather than looking at these techniques as a way to eke out the last barrels from old wells, the papers describe methods that can be deployed earlier in the life of these short-lived wells.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信