国家标准之间的多千瓦波长激光功率测量比较

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Kyle A. Rogers, Paul Williams, M. Pastuschek, H. Lecher, Stefan Kueck, Marco A Lopez, John Lehman
{"title":"国家标准之间的多千瓦波长激光功率测量比较","authors":"Kyle A. Rogers, Paul Williams, M. Pastuschek, H. Lecher, Stefan Kueck, Marco A Lopez, John Lehman","doi":"10.1088/1681-7575/ad2538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present here the first comparison between National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) of high accuracy continuous wave (cw) optical power measurements in the kilowatt regime. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) performed measurements with a power meter relying on photon momentum. The Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) performed measurements with a modified off-the-shelf thermal power meter. The non-absorbing photon momentum measurement approach permits the two power meters to measure the same laser beam optical path simultaneously, resulting in a direct comparison of the meters supported by an optical system to accommodate differences in instrument settling times. The results show agreement within the expanded uncertainties for each instrument. NIST and PTB illustrate a degree of equivalence of 0.49% with an expanded uncertainty of 1.37% (k=2) for an average result across all power levels.","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-kilowatt cw laser power measurement comparison between national standards\",\"authors\":\"Kyle A. Rogers, Paul Williams, M. Pastuschek, H. Lecher, Stefan Kueck, Marco A Lopez, John Lehman\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1681-7575/ad2538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We present here the first comparison between National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) of high accuracy continuous wave (cw) optical power measurements in the kilowatt regime. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) performed measurements with a power meter relying on photon momentum. The Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) performed measurements with a modified off-the-shelf thermal power meter. The non-absorbing photon momentum measurement approach permits the two power meters to measure the same laser beam optical path simultaneously, resulting in a direct comparison of the meters supported by an optical system to accommodate differences in instrument settling times. The results show agreement within the expanded uncertainties for each instrument. NIST and PTB illustrate a degree of equivalence of 0.49% with an expanded uncertainty of 1.37% (k=2) for an average result across all power levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metrologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad2538\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ad2538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在此首次比较了国家计量研究院(NMI)对千瓦级连续波(cw)光功率的高精度测量。美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)使用依靠光子动量的功率计进行测量。德国联邦物理技术研究所(PTB)使用改进的现成热功率计进行了测量。非吸收光子动量测量方法允许两个功率计同时测量相同的激光束光路,从而在光学系统的支持下对功率计进行直接比较,以适应仪器沉降时间的差异。结果显示,两台仪器的测量结果在扩大的不确定度范围内一致。NIST 和 PTB 表明,所有功率级别平均结果的等效度为 0.49%,扩展不确定度为 1.37%(k=2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-kilowatt cw laser power measurement comparison between national standards
We present here the first comparison between National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) of high accuracy continuous wave (cw) optical power measurements in the kilowatt regime. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) performed measurements with a power meter relying on photon momentum. The Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) performed measurements with a modified off-the-shelf thermal power meter. The non-absorbing photon momentum measurement approach permits the two power meters to measure the same laser beam optical path simultaneously, resulting in a direct comparison of the meters supported by an optical system to accommodate differences in instrument settling times. The results show agreement within the expanded uncertainties for each instrument. NIST and PTB illustrate a degree of equivalence of 0.49% with an expanded uncertainty of 1.37% (k=2) for an average result across all power levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metrologia
Metrologia 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信