自动头颅测量标志检测:新型软件模型与手动注释法的比较

Jishnu S., Binnoy Kurian, Tony Michael
{"title":"自动头颅测量标志检测:新型软件模型与手动注释法的比较","authors":"Jishnu S., Binnoy Kurian, Tony Michael","doi":"10.1177/03015742231219540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AI-based automated cephalometric landmark detection streamlines orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, providing accurate, efficient, and reliable results. Benefits include saving time, minimizing subjectivity, improving precision, and facilitating continuous improvement. However, they should complement clinician expertise, ensuring qualified orthodontists make the final diagnosis and treatment plan. To propose a method that automatically detects cephalometric landmarks on the X-ray images and compare these values with the manual annotation method. A dataset of 600 X-ray images, each containing 19 landmarks, was collected. Two orthodontists manually marked the 19 landmarks in 300 cephalograms and their coordinates were automatically extracted. The dataset was cleaned for errors, and a pre-trained CNN model with an EfficientNetB7 backbone was used for landmark detection. The model was trained on 80% of the dataset and tested on the remaining 20%. The two-step method included ROI extraction and landmark detection. The RMSE score was used to evaluate inter-examiner reliability and the R2 score was used to compare manual and automated models. Model landmark locations were compared to the manual method. The mean deviation of the predicted landmarks from the actual landmarks was calculated using RMSE, and the model showed acceptable accuracy compared to manual annotation. EfficientNetB7 was found to have detection accuracies similar to the manual annotation method. For landmarks like Porion, articulare, and soft tissue pogonion, the model outperformed the human annotation method and provides a consistent better result, and for points like Point A, pogonion, gnathion, and menton, the manual methods show more accurate results. The study introduced an automated approach using deep learning to predict landmark locations, and the results demonstrate its accuracy in comparison with the manual annotation method. This approach effectively detects cephalometric landmarks, suggesting its potential for clinical use with orthodontist’s supervision.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Cephalometric Landmark Detection: A Novel Software Model Compared with Manual Annotation Method\",\"authors\":\"Jishnu S., Binnoy Kurian, Tony Michael\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03015742231219540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AI-based automated cephalometric landmark detection streamlines orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, providing accurate, efficient, and reliable results. Benefits include saving time, minimizing subjectivity, improving precision, and facilitating continuous improvement. However, they should complement clinician expertise, ensuring qualified orthodontists make the final diagnosis and treatment plan. To propose a method that automatically detects cephalometric landmarks on the X-ray images and compare these values with the manual annotation method. A dataset of 600 X-ray images, each containing 19 landmarks, was collected. Two orthodontists manually marked the 19 landmarks in 300 cephalograms and their coordinates were automatically extracted. The dataset was cleaned for errors, and a pre-trained CNN model with an EfficientNetB7 backbone was used for landmark detection. The model was trained on 80% of the dataset and tested on the remaining 20%. The two-step method included ROI extraction and landmark detection. The RMSE score was used to evaluate inter-examiner reliability and the R2 score was used to compare manual and automated models. Model landmark locations were compared to the manual method. The mean deviation of the predicted landmarks from the actual landmarks was calculated using RMSE, and the model showed acceptable accuracy compared to manual annotation. EfficientNetB7 was found to have detection accuracies similar to the manual annotation method. For landmarks like Porion, articulare, and soft tissue pogonion, the model outperformed the human annotation method and provides a consistent better result, and for points like Point A, pogonion, gnathion, and menton, the manual methods show more accurate results. The study introduced an automated approach using deep learning to predict landmark locations, and the results demonstrate its accuracy in comparison with the manual annotation method. This approach effectively detects cephalometric landmarks, suggesting its potential for clinical use with orthodontist’s supervision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231219540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231219540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于人工智能的自动头颅测量标志检测简化了正畸诊断和治疗计划,提供准确、高效和可靠的结果。其优点包括节省时间、减少主观性、提高精确度和促进持续改进。然而,它们应该与临床医生的专业知识相辅相成,确保由合格的正畸医生做出最终诊断和治疗计划。提出一种在 X 光图像上自动检测头颅测量地标的方法,并将这些值与手动标注法进行比较。收集了一个包含 600 张 X 光图像的数据集,每张图像包含 19 个地标。两名正畸医生在 300 张头影图上手动标注了 19 个地标,并自动提取了它们的坐标。对数据集进行错误清理后,使用预先训练好的以 EfficientNetB7 为骨干的 CNN 模型进行地标检测。该模型在 80% 的数据集上进行了训练,并在剩余的 20% 数据集上进行了测试。两步法包括 ROI 提取和地标检测。RMSE 分数用于评估检查者之间的可靠性,R2 分数用于比较手动和自动模型。将模型地标位置与手动方法进行比较。使用 RMSE 计算了预测地标与实际地标的平均偏差,与人工标注相比,模型显示出了可接受的准确性。EfficientNetB7 的检测精度与人工标注方法相似。对于 Porion、articulare 和软组织 pogonion 等地标,该模型的表现优于人工标注方法,并提供了一致的较好结果;而对于 A 点、pogonion、gnathion 和 menton 等点,人工方法则显示出更准确的结果。该研究引入了一种利用深度学习预测地标位置的自动化方法,结果表明,与人工标注方法相比,该方法的准确性更高。这种方法能有效地检测出头颌测量的地标,表明它有可能在正畸医生的指导下应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Cephalometric Landmark Detection: A Novel Software Model Compared with Manual Annotation Method
AI-based automated cephalometric landmark detection streamlines orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, providing accurate, efficient, and reliable results. Benefits include saving time, minimizing subjectivity, improving precision, and facilitating continuous improvement. However, they should complement clinician expertise, ensuring qualified orthodontists make the final diagnosis and treatment plan. To propose a method that automatically detects cephalometric landmarks on the X-ray images and compare these values with the manual annotation method. A dataset of 600 X-ray images, each containing 19 landmarks, was collected. Two orthodontists manually marked the 19 landmarks in 300 cephalograms and their coordinates were automatically extracted. The dataset was cleaned for errors, and a pre-trained CNN model with an EfficientNetB7 backbone was used for landmark detection. The model was trained on 80% of the dataset and tested on the remaining 20%. The two-step method included ROI extraction and landmark detection. The RMSE score was used to evaluate inter-examiner reliability and the R2 score was used to compare manual and automated models. Model landmark locations were compared to the manual method. The mean deviation of the predicted landmarks from the actual landmarks was calculated using RMSE, and the model showed acceptable accuracy compared to manual annotation. EfficientNetB7 was found to have detection accuracies similar to the manual annotation method. For landmarks like Porion, articulare, and soft tissue pogonion, the model outperformed the human annotation method and provides a consistent better result, and for points like Point A, pogonion, gnathion, and menton, the manual methods show more accurate results. The study introduced an automated approach using deep learning to predict landmark locations, and the results demonstrate its accuracy in comparison with the manual annotation method. This approach effectively detects cephalometric landmarks, suggesting its potential for clinical use with orthodontist’s supervision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信