果戈理是斯拉夫狂热作家吗?来自塞尔维亚的观点

Q4 Arts and Humanities
E. V. Sartakov
{"title":"果戈理是斯拉夫狂热作家吗?来自塞尔维亚的观点","authors":"E. V. Sartakov","doi":"10.31425/0042-8795-2024-1-57-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is concerned with the Slavic question in Gogol’s journalism and that of the Russian Slavophiles as it was perceived in Serbia. The study was prompted by the author’s discovery of an article printed in the Serbian journal Ljetopis (1860) where Gogol is referred to as a Slavophile. This somewhat biased inclusion of Gogol into the circle of Khomyakov and the brothers Aksakov stemmed from the fact that his view of Slavic issues resembled that of the authors of Russkaya Beseda. Sartakov argues that Gogol decidedly avoided taking sides in the central dispute of the period — the rift between the Slavophiles and the Westernizers — and criticized extreme opinions expressed by both parties. According to Sartakov, Gogol’s ideological affinity with Khomyakov, the brothers Aksakov, and others proves that, rather than being influenced by their ideas, Gogol’s view on Slavic history had the same origins. To support his point, the scholar cites Gogol’s little-known sketch about the Slavs, in which the writer posits that they stood in profound civilizational contrast to their European counterparts, especially Germanic tribes.","PeriodicalId":52245,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Literatury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was Gogol a Slavophile writer? A view from Serbia\",\"authors\":\"E. V. Sartakov\",\"doi\":\"10.31425/0042-8795-2024-1-57-71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is concerned with the Slavic question in Gogol’s journalism and that of the Russian Slavophiles as it was perceived in Serbia. The study was prompted by the author’s discovery of an article printed in the Serbian journal Ljetopis (1860) where Gogol is referred to as a Slavophile. This somewhat biased inclusion of Gogol into the circle of Khomyakov and the brothers Aksakov stemmed from the fact that his view of Slavic issues resembled that of the authors of Russkaya Beseda. Sartakov argues that Gogol decidedly avoided taking sides in the central dispute of the period — the rift between the Slavophiles and the Westernizers — and criticized extreme opinions expressed by both parties. According to Sartakov, Gogol’s ideological affinity with Khomyakov, the brothers Aksakov, and others proves that, rather than being influenced by their ideas, Gogol’s view on Slavic history had the same origins. To support his point, the scholar cites Gogol’s little-known sketch about the Slavs, in which the writer posits that they stood in profound civilizational contrast to their European counterparts, especially Germanic tribes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2024-1-57-71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Literatury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2024-1-57-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章关注果戈理新闻作品中的斯拉夫问题,以及塞尔维亚人眼中的俄罗斯斯拉夫狂热者问题。作者发现塞尔维亚期刊《Ljetopis》(1860 年)上刊登的一篇文章将果戈理称为斯拉夫狂热者,从而引发了这项研究。将果戈理纳入霍米亚科夫和阿克萨科夫兄弟的圈子多少有些偏颇,这是因为果戈理对斯拉夫问题的看法与《Russkaya Beseda》的作者相似。萨尔塔科夫认为,果戈理在当时的核心争议--斯拉夫派和西化派之间的裂痕--中坚决避免站队,并批评了双方表达的极端观点。萨尔塔科夫认为,果戈理与霍米亚科夫、阿克萨科夫兄弟等人在意识形态上的亲密关系证明,果戈理的斯拉夫史观与其说是受他们思想的影响,不如说是同出一源。为了支持自己的观点,这位学者引用了果戈理鲜为人知的关于斯拉夫人的素描,在这幅素描中,作家认为斯拉夫人在文明上与他们的欧洲同行,尤其是日耳曼部落形成了深刻的对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Was Gogol a Slavophile writer? A view from Serbia
The article is concerned with the Slavic question in Gogol’s journalism and that of the Russian Slavophiles as it was perceived in Serbia. The study was prompted by the author’s discovery of an article printed in the Serbian journal Ljetopis (1860) where Gogol is referred to as a Slavophile. This somewhat biased inclusion of Gogol into the circle of Khomyakov and the brothers Aksakov stemmed from the fact that his view of Slavic issues resembled that of the authors of Russkaya Beseda. Sartakov argues that Gogol decidedly avoided taking sides in the central dispute of the period — the rift between the Slavophiles and the Westernizers — and criticized extreme opinions expressed by both parties. According to Sartakov, Gogol’s ideological affinity with Khomyakov, the brothers Aksakov, and others proves that, rather than being influenced by their ideas, Gogol’s view on Slavic history had the same origins. To support his point, the scholar cites Gogol’s little-known sketch about the Slavs, in which the writer posits that they stood in profound civilizational contrast to their European counterparts, especially Germanic tribes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Literatury
Voprosy Literatury Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信