第 19 次世界艾滋病病毒(COVID)大流行前后的货币政策效力:印度的证据

Sujit Kumar, Anoop S. Kumar
{"title":"第 19 次世界艾滋病病毒(COVID)大流行前后的货币政策效力:印度的证据","authors":"Sujit Kumar, Anoop S. Kumar","doi":"10.1177/09722629231225549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inflation has run higher than the targets of central banks across the globe post the COVID-19 pandemic. India is no exception. The central banks have responded through synchronous interest rate increases. The efficacy of policy measures has been mixed though, underscoring country-specific differences in sources of inflation and monetary transmission across channels. Employing a time-varying vector autoregression framework, we analyse the interaction with output, interest rate and inflation in India. We employ quarterly data on real GDP growth, Wholesale Price Index (WPI) growth, Consumer Price Index (CPI)-Industrial workers (CPI-IW) growth and 1 year-treasury bill rate, from 2005–2006 Q1 to 2021–2022 Q4. We use two measures of inflation to get the dynamics of retail and wholesale inflation. We contrast the interactions of aforesaid variables through time-varying impulse response functions (IRFs) during two big macroeconomic events, namely, the subprime crisis of 2008 and COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. During the subprime crisis in 2008, we saw negligible response in the short, medium and long run. During the COVID-19 period, we find all time-varying IRFs are synchronized. The response of CPI-IW to the interest rate shock is very different from that of WPI, underscoring differences in the composition of these price measures. A shock from the interest rate keeps the CPI-IW stable at best; we do not see any reduction in CPI-IW across the short, medium and long run. The reaction of GDP growth to interest rate shock is rather flat during both the subprime crisis and COVID-19 in the short, medium and long run, pointing towards potential monetary policy ineffectiveness in stimulating the growth.","PeriodicalId":503812,"journal":{"name":"Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monetary Policy Efficacy Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from India\",\"authors\":\"Sujit Kumar, Anoop S. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09722629231225549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inflation has run higher than the targets of central banks across the globe post the COVID-19 pandemic. India is no exception. The central banks have responded through synchronous interest rate increases. The efficacy of policy measures has been mixed though, underscoring country-specific differences in sources of inflation and monetary transmission across channels. Employing a time-varying vector autoregression framework, we analyse the interaction with output, interest rate and inflation in India. We employ quarterly data on real GDP growth, Wholesale Price Index (WPI) growth, Consumer Price Index (CPI)-Industrial workers (CPI-IW) growth and 1 year-treasury bill rate, from 2005–2006 Q1 to 2021–2022 Q4. We use two measures of inflation to get the dynamics of retail and wholesale inflation. We contrast the interactions of aforesaid variables through time-varying impulse response functions (IRFs) during two big macroeconomic events, namely, the subprime crisis of 2008 and COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. During the subprime crisis in 2008, we saw negligible response in the short, medium and long run. During the COVID-19 period, we find all time-varying IRFs are synchronized. The response of CPI-IW to the interest rate shock is very different from that of WPI, underscoring differences in the composition of these price measures. A shock from the interest rate keeps the CPI-IW stable at best; we do not see any reduction in CPI-IW across the short, medium and long run. The reaction of GDP growth to interest rate shock is rather flat during both the subprime crisis and COVID-19 in the short, medium and long run, pointing towards potential monetary policy ineffectiveness in stimulating the growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629231225549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629231225549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行后,全球各地的通货膨胀率都高于中央银行的目标。印度也不例外。各国央行通过同步提高利率来应对。但政策措施的效果参差不齐,凸显了各国在通胀来源和货币传导渠道方面的差异。我们采用时变向量自回归框架,分析了印度产出、利率和通货膨胀之间的相互作用。我们采用了 2005-2006 年第一季度至 2021-2022 年第四季度的实际 GDP 增长、批发价格指数(WPI)增长、消费价格指数(CPI)-产业工人(CPI-IW)增长和 1 年期国库券利率的季度数据。我们使用两种通胀衡量方法来了解零售和批发通胀的动态。在 2008 年次贷危机和 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行这两大宏观经济事件中,我们通过时变脉冲响应函数(IRF)对比了上述变量的相互作用。在 2008 年次贷危机期间,我们看到短期、中期和长期的反应都微乎其微。在 COVID-19 期间,我们发现所有时变 IRF 都是同步的。消费物价指数-工业品出厂价格对利率冲击的反应与工业品出厂价格对利率冲击的反应截然不同,这凸显了这些价格指标构成的差异。利率冲击充其量只能使消费物价指数-IW 保持稳定;从短期、中期和长期来看,我们看不到消费物价指数-IW 有任何下降。在次贷危机和 COVID-19 期间,GDP 增长对利率冲击的反应在短期、中期和长期都相当平缓,这表明货币政策在刺激经济增长方面可能效果不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monetary Policy Efficacy Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from India
Inflation has run higher than the targets of central banks across the globe post the COVID-19 pandemic. India is no exception. The central banks have responded through synchronous interest rate increases. The efficacy of policy measures has been mixed though, underscoring country-specific differences in sources of inflation and monetary transmission across channels. Employing a time-varying vector autoregression framework, we analyse the interaction with output, interest rate and inflation in India. We employ quarterly data on real GDP growth, Wholesale Price Index (WPI) growth, Consumer Price Index (CPI)-Industrial workers (CPI-IW) growth and 1 year-treasury bill rate, from 2005–2006 Q1 to 2021–2022 Q4. We use two measures of inflation to get the dynamics of retail and wholesale inflation. We contrast the interactions of aforesaid variables through time-varying impulse response functions (IRFs) during two big macroeconomic events, namely, the subprime crisis of 2008 and COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. During the subprime crisis in 2008, we saw negligible response in the short, medium and long run. During the COVID-19 period, we find all time-varying IRFs are synchronized. The response of CPI-IW to the interest rate shock is very different from that of WPI, underscoring differences in the composition of these price measures. A shock from the interest rate keeps the CPI-IW stable at best; we do not see any reduction in CPI-IW across the short, medium and long run. The reaction of GDP growth to interest rate shock is rather flat during both the subprime crisis and COVID-19 in the short, medium and long run, pointing towards potential monetary policy ineffectiveness in stimulating the growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信