全面评估医护人员对 COVID-19 疫苗的抗体反应:伊朗多中心研究

Zahra Panahi, Parisa Kianpour, Sajad Sahab-Negah, M. H. Karbalaie Niya, S. Nadji, Reza Mourtami, Atabak Najafi, Babak Jahangiri, Reza Pourfallah, Mahdi Chahabi, Mina Nouri, Fatemeh Beiraghdar, Mahin Jamshidi Makiani
{"title":"全面评估医护人员对 COVID-19 疫苗的抗体反应:伊朗多中心研究","authors":"Zahra Panahi, Parisa Kianpour, Sajad Sahab-Negah, M. H. Karbalaie Niya, S. Nadji, Reza Mourtami, Atabak Najafi, Babak Jahangiri, Reza Pourfallah, Mahdi Chahabi, Mina Nouri, Fatemeh Beiraghdar, Mahin Jamshidi Makiani","doi":"10.5812/archcid-143913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are very good at protecting individuals from serious illness, needing hospital care, and dying from different strains of the virus. However, vaccines might not completely prevent individuals from catching and spreading the virus, and this might depend on some personal factors. Objectives: To find out the immune response of COVID-19 vaccines, this cross-sectional study conducted within June 2021 to May 2023 assessed different types of COVID-19 vaccine antibody responses among healthcare professionals and their associations with demographic factors and comorbidity risk factors. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on recruited healthcare professionals from Sina, Imam Khomeini Complex, 501 AJA, Baqiayatallah, and Firoozgar hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The vaccines whose antibody response was investigated in this study are Sinopharm® (China), AstraZeneca® (United Kingdom), Sputnik® (Russia), and Covaxin® (India). Anti-spike, anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD), and anti-neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG) were evaluated by commercial kits according to instructions. Results: This study involved 1 029 healthcare workers who were over 18 years old. The average age was 41.48 ± 9.9 years, and 602 (58.5%) of them were male. The vaccines they received were Sputnik V (392 or 38.16%), AstraZeneca (335 or 32.61%), Baharat (45 or 4.3%), and Sinopharm (255 or 24.82%). The Covaxin and AstraZeneca vaccines increased both anti-RBD and anti-neutralizing IgG Ab levels; however, the Sinopharm vaccine increased only the latter. The Sputnik vaccine was the least effective. Gender and diabetes influenced the antibody levels, but age did not. Conclusions: This study revealed the substantial effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in generating robust antibody responses among healthcare professionals. All four vaccine types, Sinopharm, AstraZeneca, Sputnik, and Covaxin, elicited significant antibody responses in over 70% of participants, highlighting the crucial role of vaccination in building defense against COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":505511,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"26 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccines Antibody Response Among Healthcare Professionals: A Multi-Center Study in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Panahi, Parisa Kianpour, Sajad Sahab-Negah, M. H. Karbalaie Niya, S. Nadji, Reza Mourtami, Atabak Najafi, Babak Jahangiri, Reza Pourfallah, Mahdi Chahabi, Mina Nouri, Fatemeh Beiraghdar, Mahin Jamshidi Makiani\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/archcid-143913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are very good at protecting individuals from serious illness, needing hospital care, and dying from different strains of the virus. However, vaccines might not completely prevent individuals from catching and spreading the virus, and this might depend on some personal factors. Objectives: To find out the immune response of COVID-19 vaccines, this cross-sectional study conducted within June 2021 to May 2023 assessed different types of COVID-19 vaccine antibody responses among healthcare professionals and their associations with demographic factors and comorbidity risk factors. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on recruited healthcare professionals from Sina, Imam Khomeini Complex, 501 AJA, Baqiayatallah, and Firoozgar hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The vaccines whose antibody response was investigated in this study are Sinopharm® (China), AstraZeneca® (United Kingdom), Sputnik® (Russia), and Covaxin® (India). Anti-spike, anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD), and anti-neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG) were evaluated by commercial kits according to instructions. Results: This study involved 1 029 healthcare workers who were over 18 years old. The average age was 41.48 ± 9.9 years, and 602 (58.5%) of them were male. The vaccines they received were Sputnik V (392 or 38.16%), AstraZeneca (335 or 32.61%), Baharat (45 or 4.3%), and Sinopharm (255 or 24.82%). The Covaxin and AstraZeneca vaccines increased both anti-RBD and anti-neutralizing IgG Ab levels; however, the Sinopharm vaccine increased only the latter. The Sputnik vaccine was the least effective. Gender and diabetes influenced the antibody levels, but age did not. Conclusions: This study revealed the substantial effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in generating robust antibody responses among healthcare professionals. All four vaccine types, Sinopharm, AstraZeneca, Sputnik, and Covaxin, elicited significant antibody responses in over 70% of participants, highlighting the crucial role of vaccination in building defense against COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"26 38\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-143913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-143913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗能很好地保护个人免受不同病毒株的严重疾病、住院治疗和死亡。但是,疫苗可能无法完全防止个人感染和传播病毒,这可能取决于一些个人因素。研究目的为了了解 COVID-19 疫苗的免疫反应,这项横断面研究在 2021 年 6 月至 2023 年 5 月期间进行,评估了医疗保健专业人员对不同类型 COVID-19 疫苗的抗体反应及其与人口统计学因素和合并症风险因素的关系。方法:这项描述性分析研究的对象是来自伊朗德黑兰西纳医院、伊玛目-霍梅尼综合医院、501 AJA 医院、Baqiayatallah 医院和 Firoozgar 医院的医护人员。本研究调查抗体反应的疫苗是国药集团®(中国)、阿斯利康®(英国)、斯巴尼克®(俄罗斯)和可维欣®(印度)。抗尖峰抗体、抗受体结合域(RBD)抗体和抗中性免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)抗体均按说明使用商业试剂盒进行评估。结果:本研究涉及 1 029 名 18 岁以上的医护人员。平均年龄为 41.48 ± 9.9 岁,其中 602 人(58.5%)为男性。他们接种的疫苗分别是斯巴尼克五号(392人,占38.16%)、阿斯利康(335人,占32.61%)、百华(45人,占4.3%)和国药(255人,占24.82%)。康维欣和阿斯利康疫苗同时提高了抗 RBD 和抗中性 IgG Ab 的水平;而国药疫苗只提高了后者。斯巴尼克疫苗的效果最差。性别和糖尿病会影响抗体水平,但年龄不会。结论本研究揭示了 COVID-19 疫苗在医护人员中产生强大抗体反应的巨大功效。国药集团、阿斯利康、斯巴尼克和科华新这四种疫苗都能在70%以上的参与者中引起明显的抗体反应,这突出了疫苗接种在建立COVID-19防御体系中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccines Antibody Response Among Healthcare Professionals: A Multi-Center Study in Iran
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are very good at protecting individuals from serious illness, needing hospital care, and dying from different strains of the virus. However, vaccines might not completely prevent individuals from catching and spreading the virus, and this might depend on some personal factors. Objectives: To find out the immune response of COVID-19 vaccines, this cross-sectional study conducted within June 2021 to May 2023 assessed different types of COVID-19 vaccine antibody responses among healthcare professionals and their associations with demographic factors and comorbidity risk factors. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on recruited healthcare professionals from Sina, Imam Khomeini Complex, 501 AJA, Baqiayatallah, and Firoozgar hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The vaccines whose antibody response was investigated in this study are Sinopharm® (China), AstraZeneca® (United Kingdom), Sputnik® (Russia), and Covaxin® (India). Anti-spike, anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD), and anti-neutralizing immunoglobulin G (IgG) were evaluated by commercial kits according to instructions. Results: This study involved 1 029 healthcare workers who were over 18 years old. The average age was 41.48 ± 9.9 years, and 602 (58.5%) of them were male. The vaccines they received were Sputnik V (392 or 38.16%), AstraZeneca (335 or 32.61%), Baharat (45 or 4.3%), and Sinopharm (255 or 24.82%). The Covaxin and AstraZeneca vaccines increased both anti-RBD and anti-neutralizing IgG Ab levels; however, the Sinopharm vaccine increased only the latter. The Sputnik vaccine was the least effective. Gender and diabetes influenced the antibody levels, but age did not. Conclusions: This study revealed the substantial effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in generating robust antibody responses among healthcare professionals. All four vaccine types, Sinopharm, AstraZeneca, Sputnik, and Covaxin, elicited significant antibody responses in over 70% of participants, highlighting the crucial role of vaccination in building defense against COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信