P. Chitra, Neeraj Kumar Dudy, Shubhnita Verma, Gyanda Mishra
{"title":"用于牙科摄影的数码单反相机和无反光镜相机的比较分析","authors":"P. Chitra, Neeraj Kumar Dudy, Shubhnita Verma, Gyanda Mishra","doi":"10.1177/03015742241226517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare current DSLR and mirrorless camera systems for ease of use, efficiency, and cost in routine dental photography. Methods: Two currently available camera systems (DSLR + macro lens + ring flash/external flash and mirrorless camera + macro lens + ring flash/external flash) were compared and assessed for ease of use, sensor sizes, features, quality of imaging, battery capability, and costs. Results: Mirrorless cameras were smaller and lighter by 16% as compared to DSLRs. Superior Digic X image processors in mirrorless give better image quality compared to DSLRs with older Digic 8 processors. Focus points on the mirrorless are greater at 651 as compared to just 9 on DSLRs. Battery capacity with DSLRs is better at 600–800 shots per charge as compared to 250–300 shots per charge with mirrorless cameras. Overall, the mirrorless camera was priced 16% higher than DSLR cameras. Conclusion: There is a technological shift toward mirrorless camera systems across manufacturers. In the medium to long term, mirrorless technology will replace current DSLR systems making it imperative for dentists to understand and adapt to using mirrorless cameras in imaging.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"119 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of DSLR and Mirrorless Cameras for Dental Photography\",\"authors\":\"P. Chitra, Neeraj Kumar Dudy, Shubhnita Verma, Gyanda Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03015742241226517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare current DSLR and mirrorless camera systems for ease of use, efficiency, and cost in routine dental photography. Methods: Two currently available camera systems (DSLR + macro lens + ring flash/external flash and mirrorless camera + macro lens + ring flash/external flash) were compared and assessed for ease of use, sensor sizes, features, quality of imaging, battery capability, and costs. Results: Mirrorless cameras were smaller and lighter by 16% as compared to DSLRs. Superior Digic X image processors in mirrorless give better image quality compared to DSLRs with older Digic 8 processors. Focus points on the mirrorless are greater at 651 as compared to just 9 on DSLRs. Battery capacity with DSLRs is better at 600–800 shots per charge as compared to 250–300 shots per charge with mirrorless cameras. Overall, the mirrorless camera was priced 16% higher than DSLR cameras. Conclusion: There is a technological shift toward mirrorless camera systems across manufacturers. In the medium to long term, mirrorless technology will replace current DSLR systems making it imperative for dentists to understand and adapt to using mirrorless cameras in imaging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"119 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742241226517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742241226517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Analysis of DSLR and Mirrorless Cameras for Dental Photography
Aim: To compare current DSLR and mirrorless camera systems for ease of use, efficiency, and cost in routine dental photography. Methods: Two currently available camera systems (DSLR + macro lens + ring flash/external flash and mirrorless camera + macro lens + ring flash/external flash) were compared and assessed for ease of use, sensor sizes, features, quality of imaging, battery capability, and costs. Results: Mirrorless cameras were smaller and lighter by 16% as compared to DSLRs. Superior Digic X image processors in mirrorless give better image quality compared to DSLRs with older Digic 8 processors. Focus points on the mirrorless are greater at 651 as compared to just 9 on DSLRs. Battery capacity with DSLRs is better at 600–800 shots per charge as compared to 250–300 shots per charge with mirrorless cameras. Overall, the mirrorless camera was priced 16% higher than DSLR cameras. Conclusion: There is a technological shift toward mirrorless camera systems across manufacturers. In the medium to long term, mirrorless technology will replace current DSLR systems making it imperative for dentists to understand and adapt to using mirrorless cameras in imaging.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
