D. Mendes, C. Veiga, Rui Machado, Pedro Sá-Pinto, R. Almeida
{"title":"处理原发性主动脉壁血栓的挑战:结果和技术考虑因素","authors":"D. Mendes, C. Veiga, Rui Machado, Pedro Sá-Pinto, R. Almeida","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1779489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Embolization to multiple arterial beds associated with primary aortic mural thrombus (PAMT) could result in high morbidity and mortality. There are no recommendations to dictate the best management. This study aims to describe our experience in managing this rare disease.\n Methods: A retrospective review of all patients affected by PAMT treated at our institution between January 2015 and December 2021 was performed. Recorded data included demographics, prothrombotic risk factors, imaging findings, clinical presentation, and treatment. Primary outcomes comprised thrombus recurrence, major amputation, and death.\n Results: Thirteen patients with PAMT have been included. The median age was 52 years (36–68 years), and the male/female ratio was 1:1.6. The diagnosis of PAMT was made by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in all cases. Prothrombotic conditions were identified in 92% of cases, and most patients (92%) had thoracic PAMT. The most common presentation was acute limb ischemia after thrombus embolization (85%), requiring surgical revascularization. Anticoagulation was promptly started in all patients. Two patients developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Recurrence of embolization/thrombosis was observed in 54% of patients; two underwent endovascular thrombus exclusion with a stent graft. We identified one PAMT-related death and one major amputation with a median follow-up time of 39 months (12–64 months).\n Conclusion: Anticoagulation alone as initial therapy could completely resolve PAMT but is associated with high embolization recurrence. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is feasible and could prevent additional embolization. However, the criteria for its use as a first-line therapy still need to be defined. Our study highlights the importance of closely monitoring these patients.","PeriodicalId":506654,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Angiology","volume":"35 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Challenge of Managing a Primary Aortic Mural Thrombus: Outcomes and Technical Considerations\",\"authors\":\"D. Mendes, C. Veiga, Rui Machado, Pedro Sá-Pinto, R. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1779489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background: Embolization to multiple arterial beds associated with primary aortic mural thrombus (PAMT) could result in high morbidity and mortality. There are no recommendations to dictate the best management. This study aims to describe our experience in managing this rare disease.\\n Methods: A retrospective review of all patients affected by PAMT treated at our institution between January 2015 and December 2021 was performed. Recorded data included demographics, prothrombotic risk factors, imaging findings, clinical presentation, and treatment. Primary outcomes comprised thrombus recurrence, major amputation, and death.\\n Results: Thirteen patients with PAMT have been included. The median age was 52 years (36–68 years), and the male/female ratio was 1:1.6. The diagnosis of PAMT was made by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in all cases. Prothrombotic conditions were identified in 92% of cases, and most patients (92%) had thoracic PAMT. The most common presentation was acute limb ischemia after thrombus embolization (85%), requiring surgical revascularization. Anticoagulation was promptly started in all patients. Two patients developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Recurrence of embolization/thrombosis was observed in 54% of patients; two underwent endovascular thrombus exclusion with a stent graft. We identified one PAMT-related death and one major amputation with a median follow-up time of 39 months (12–64 months).\\n Conclusion: Anticoagulation alone as initial therapy could completely resolve PAMT but is associated with high embolization recurrence. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is feasible and could prevent additional embolization. However, the criteria for its use as a first-line therapy still need to be defined. Our study highlights the importance of closely monitoring these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Angiology\",\"volume\":\"35 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1779489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Challenge of Managing a Primary Aortic Mural Thrombus: Outcomes and Technical Considerations
Background: Embolization to multiple arterial beds associated with primary aortic mural thrombus (PAMT) could result in high morbidity and mortality. There are no recommendations to dictate the best management. This study aims to describe our experience in managing this rare disease.
Methods: A retrospective review of all patients affected by PAMT treated at our institution between January 2015 and December 2021 was performed. Recorded data included demographics, prothrombotic risk factors, imaging findings, clinical presentation, and treatment. Primary outcomes comprised thrombus recurrence, major amputation, and death.
Results: Thirteen patients with PAMT have been included. The median age was 52 years (36–68 years), and the male/female ratio was 1:1.6. The diagnosis of PAMT was made by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in all cases. Prothrombotic conditions were identified in 92% of cases, and most patients (92%) had thoracic PAMT. The most common presentation was acute limb ischemia after thrombus embolization (85%), requiring surgical revascularization. Anticoagulation was promptly started in all patients. Two patients developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Recurrence of embolization/thrombosis was observed in 54% of patients; two underwent endovascular thrombus exclusion with a stent graft. We identified one PAMT-related death and one major amputation with a median follow-up time of 39 months (12–64 months).
Conclusion: Anticoagulation alone as initial therapy could completely resolve PAMT but is associated with high embolization recurrence. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is feasible and could prevent additional embolization. However, the criteria for its use as a first-line therapy still need to be defined. Our study highlights the importance of closely monitoring these patients.