与印度西北部地下水灌溉系统下的传统水稻水坑插秧相比,评估不同水分胁迫水平下的零耕作直播情况

IF 1.6 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Satyendra Kumar, Bhaskar Narjary, Kalpana Paudyal, Rajender Kumar Yadav, Sushil Kumar Kamra
{"title":"与印度西北部地下水灌溉系统下的传统水稻水坑插秧相比,评估不同水分胁迫水平下的零耕作直播情况","authors":"Satyendra Kumar,&nbsp;Bhaskar Narjary,&nbsp;Kalpana Paudyal,&nbsp;Rajender Kumar Yadav,&nbsp;Sushil Kumar Kamra","doi":"10.1002/ird.2930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Irrigation of rice using groundwater is considered one of the main contributors to north-west India's declining water level. The present study hypothesizes that zero-till direct seeding of rice (ZTDSR) with the optimum irrigation schedule may reduce irrigation compared to puddled transplanted rice (PTR). Crop growth stage-dependent predefined soil matric potential (SMP), that is, −15, −30 and −45 kPa based irrigation schedules either during the entire growing period or their combinations during the vegetative phase in ZTDSR, were compared with PTR for two consecutive seasons. The results showed that irrigation in ZTDSR at lower SMP at any growth stage caused adverse effects on yield. Irrigation at −15 kPa during the entire crop season with straw mulch was found to be the best schedule for ZTDSR. ZTDSR with −15 kPa irrigation, however, saved 36.2 cm of water and recorded higher water productivity but produced 20% less grain yield over the prevailing PTR. A higher groundwater system loss (GWSL) was found in the PTR (29.2 cm) than in the best ZTDSR (23.6 cm) schedule, which indicates better groundwater management in the ZTDSR than in the PTR. Hence, the ZTDSR has the potential to save irrigation, achieve higher water productivity and manage the depletion of groundwater resources in rice–wheat dominant north-west India.</p>","PeriodicalId":14848,"journal":{"name":"Irrigation and Drainage","volume":"73 3","pages":"928-943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing zero-till direct seeding at variable water stress levels compared to traditional puddled transplanting of rice under groundwater-fed irrigation systems in north-west India\",\"authors\":\"Satyendra Kumar,&nbsp;Bhaskar Narjary,&nbsp;Kalpana Paudyal,&nbsp;Rajender Kumar Yadav,&nbsp;Sushil Kumar Kamra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ird.2930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Irrigation of rice using groundwater is considered one of the main contributors to north-west India's declining water level. The present study hypothesizes that zero-till direct seeding of rice (ZTDSR) with the optimum irrigation schedule may reduce irrigation compared to puddled transplanted rice (PTR). Crop growth stage-dependent predefined soil matric potential (SMP), that is, −15, −30 and −45 kPa based irrigation schedules either during the entire growing period or their combinations during the vegetative phase in ZTDSR, were compared with PTR for two consecutive seasons. The results showed that irrigation in ZTDSR at lower SMP at any growth stage caused adverse effects on yield. Irrigation at −15 kPa during the entire crop season with straw mulch was found to be the best schedule for ZTDSR. ZTDSR with −15 kPa irrigation, however, saved 36.2 cm of water and recorded higher water productivity but produced 20% less grain yield over the prevailing PTR. A higher groundwater system loss (GWSL) was found in the PTR (29.2 cm) than in the best ZTDSR (23.6 cm) schedule, which indicates better groundwater management in the ZTDSR than in the PTR. Hence, the ZTDSR has the potential to save irrigation, achieve higher water productivity and manage the depletion of groundwater resources in rice–wheat dominant north-west India.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"928-943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irrigation and Drainage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird.2930\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irrigation and Drainage","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird.2930","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用地下水灌溉水稻被认为是造成印度西北部水位下降的主要原因之一。本研究假设,与水田移栽水稻(PTR)相比,采用最佳灌溉时间表的零耕作直播水稻(ZTDSR)可减少灌溉。研究比较了连续两季水稻零耕作直播(ZTDSR)与水稻坑插秧(PTR)根据作物生长阶段预先确定的土壤母质势(SMP),即在整个生长期或在植株期基于-15、-30 和 -45 kPa 的灌溉计划。结果表明,ZTDSR 在任何生长阶段以较低的 SMP 进行灌溉都会对产量产生不利影响。在整个作物生长期,在-15 kPa 下灌溉并覆盖稻草被认为是 ZTDSR 的最佳时间安排。然而,-15 千帕灌溉的 ZTDSR 节水 36.2 厘米,水分生产率较高,但谷物产量比当时的 PTR 低 20%。与最佳 ZTDSR(23.6 厘米)相比,PTR(29.2 厘米)的地下水系统损失(GWSL)更高,这表明 ZTDSR 比 PTR 有更好的地下水管理。因此,在印度西北部以水稻-小麦为主的地区,ZTDSR 具有节约灌溉、提高水生产力和管理地下水资源枯竭的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing zero-till direct seeding at variable water stress levels compared to traditional puddled transplanting of rice under groundwater-fed irrigation systems in north-west India

Irrigation of rice using groundwater is considered one of the main contributors to north-west India's declining water level. The present study hypothesizes that zero-till direct seeding of rice (ZTDSR) with the optimum irrigation schedule may reduce irrigation compared to puddled transplanted rice (PTR). Crop growth stage-dependent predefined soil matric potential (SMP), that is, −15, −30 and −45 kPa based irrigation schedules either during the entire growing period or their combinations during the vegetative phase in ZTDSR, were compared with PTR for two consecutive seasons. The results showed that irrigation in ZTDSR at lower SMP at any growth stage caused adverse effects on yield. Irrigation at −15 kPa during the entire crop season with straw mulch was found to be the best schedule for ZTDSR. ZTDSR with −15 kPa irrigation, however, saved 36.2 cm of water and recorded higher water productivity but produced 20% less grain yield over the prevailing PTR. A higher groundwater system loss (GWSL) was found in the PTR (29.2 cm) than in the best ZTDSR (23.6 cm) schedule, which indicates better groundwater management in the ZTDSR than in the PTR. Hence, the ZTDSR has the potential to save irrigation, achieve higher water productivity and manage the depletion of groundwater resources in rice–wheat dominant north-west India.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irrigation and Drainage
Irrigation and Drainage 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Human intervention in the control of water for sustainable agricultural development involves the application of technology and management approaches to: (i) provide the appropriate quantities of water when it is needed by the crops, (ii) prevent salinisation and water-logging of the root zone, (iii) protect land from flooding, and (iv) maximise the beneficial use of water by appropriate allocation, conservation and reuse. All this has to be achieved within a framework of economic, social and environmental constraints. The Journal, therefore, covers a wide range of subjects, advancement in which, through high quality papers in the Journal, will make a significant contribution to the enormous task of satisfying the needs of the world’s ever-increasing population. The Journal also publishes book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信