深度学习在自闭症谱系障碍检测中的应用综述:从数据到诊断

Manjunath Ramanna Lamani, Julian Benadit P
{"title":"深度学习在自闭症谱系障碍检测中的应用综述:从数据到诊断","authors":"Manjunath Ramanna Lamani, Julian Benadit P","doi":"10.2174/0126662558284886240130154414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a multifaceted neurodevelopmental\ncondition with significant heterogeneity in its clinical presentation. Timely and precise\nidentification of ASD is crucial for effective intervention and assistance. Recent advances in\ndeep learning techniques have shown promise in enhancing the accuracy of ASD detection.\n\n\n\nThis comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of various deep learning\nmethods employed in detecting ASD, utilizing diverse neuroimaging modalities. We analyze a\nrange of studies that use resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rsfMRI), structural\nMRI (sMRI), task-based fMRI (tfMRI), and electroencephalography (EEG). This paper\naims to assess the effectiveness of these techniques based on criteria such as accuracy, sensitivity,\nspecificity, and computational efficiency.\n\n\n\nWe systematically review studies investigating ASD detection using deep learning\nacross different neuroimaging modalities. These studies utilize various preprocessing tools, atlases,\nfeature extraction techniques, and classification algorithms. The performance metrics of\ninterest include accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, recall, and area under the\ncurve (AUC).\n\n\n\nThe review covers a wide range of studies, each with its own dataset and methodology.\nNotable findings include a study employing rsfMRI data from ABIDE that achieved an accuracy\nof 80% using LeNet. Another study using rsfMRI data from ABIDE-II achieved an impressive\naccuracy of 95.4% with the ASGCN deep learning model. Studies utilizing different\nmodalities, such as EEG and sMRI, also reported high accuracies ranging from 74% to 95%.\n\n\n\nDeep learning-based approaches for ASD detection have demonstrated significant\npotential across multiple neuroimaging modalities. These methods offer a more objective and\ndata-driven approach to diagnosis, potentially reducing the subjectivity associated with clinical\nevaluations. However, challenges remain, including the need for larger and more diverse datasets,\nmodel interpretability, and clinical validation. The field of deep learning in ASD diagnosis\ncontinues to evolve, holding promise for early and accurate identification of individuals\nwith ASD, which is crucial for timely intervention and support.\n","PeriodicalId":506582,"journal":{"name":"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Thorough Review of Deep Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection: From Data to Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Manjunath Ramanna Lamani, Julian Benadit P\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0126662558284886240130154414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a multifaceted neurodevelopmental\\ncondition with significant heterogeneity in its clinical presentation. Timely and precise\\nidentification of ASD is crucial for effective intervention and assistance. Recent advances in\\ndeep learning techniques have shown promise in enhancing the accuracy of ASD detection.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of various deep learning\\nmethods employed in detecting ASD, utilizing diverse neuroimaging modalities. We analyze a\\nrange of studies that use resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rsfMRI), structural\\nMRI (sMRI), task-based fMRI (tfMRI), and electroencephalography (EEG). This paper\\naims to assess the effectiveness of these techniques based on criteria such as accuracy, sensitivity,\\nspecificity, and computational efficiency.\\n\\n\\n\\nWe systematically review studies investigating ASD detection using deep learning\\nacross different neuroimaging modalities. These studies utilize various preprocessing tools, atlases,\\nfeature extraction techniques, and classification algorithms. The performance metrics of\\ninterest include accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, recall, and area under the\\ncurve (AUC).\\n\\n\\n\\nThe review covers a wide range of studies, each with its own dataset and methodology.\\nNotable findings include a study employing rsfMRI data from ABIDE that achieved an accuracy\\nof 80% using LeNet. Another study using rsfMRI data from ABIDE-II achieved an impressive\\naccuracy of 95.4% with the ASGCN deep learning model. Studies utilizing different\\nmodalities, such as EEG and sMRI, also reported high accuracies ranging from 74% to 95%.\\n\\n\\n\\nDeep learning-based approaches for ASD detection have demonstrated significant\\npotential across multiple neuroimaging modalities. These methods offer a more objective and\\ndata-driven approach to diagnosis, potentially reducing the subjectivity associated with clinical\\nevaluations. However, challenges remain, including the need for larger and more diverse datasets,\\nmodel interpretability, and clinical validation. The field of deep learning in ASD diagnosis\\ncontinues to evolve, holding promise for early and accurate identification of individuals\\nwith ASD, which is crucial for timely intervention and support.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":506582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558284886240130154414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558284886240130154414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种多方面的神经发育疾病,其临床表现具有显著的异质性。及时准确地识别自闭症对有效干预和援助至关重要。本综述旨在概述利用各种神经成像模式检测 ASD 的各种深度学习方法。我们分析了一系列使用静息态功能磁共振成像(rsfMRI)、结构磁共振成像(sMRI)、基于任务的 fMRI(tfMRI)和脑电图(EEG)的研究。本文旨在根据准确性、灵敏度、特异性和计算效率等标准评估这些技术的有效性。我们系统地回顾了使用深度学习跨不同神经成像模式检测 ASD 的研究。这些研究利用了各种预处理工具、图集、特征提取技术和分类算法。值得关注的性能指标包括准确度、灵敏度、特异性、精确度、F1-分数、召回率和曲线下面积(AUC)。另一项研究利用 ABIDE-II 的 rsfMRI 数据,使用 ASGCN 深度学习模型达到了令人印象深刻的 95.4% 的准确率。基于深度学习的 ASD 检测方法已在多种神经成像模式中展现出巨大潜力。这些方法提供了一种更客观和数据驱动的诊断方法,有可能减少与临床评估相关的主观性。然而,挑战依然存在,包括需要更大、更多样化的数据集、模型可解释性和临床验证。ASD 诊断中的深度学习领域仍在不断发展,有望早期准确识别 ASD 患者,这对及时干预和支持至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Thorough Review of Deep Learning in Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection: From Data to Diagnosis
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a multifaceted neurodevelopmental condition with significant heterogeneity in its clinical presentation. Timely and precise identification of ASD is crucial for effective intervention and assistance. Recent advances in deep learning techniques have shown promise in enhancing the accuracy of ASD detection. This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of various deep learning methods employed in detecting ASD, utilizing diverse neuroimaging modalities. We analyze a range of studies that use resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rsfMRI), structural MRI (sMRI), task-based fMRI (tfMRI), and electroencephalography (EEG). This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of these techniques based on criteria such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and computational efficiency. We systematically review studies investigating ASD detection using deep learning across different neuroimaging modalities. These studies utilize various preprocessing tools, atlases, feature extraction techniques, and classification algorithms. The performance metrics of interest include accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, recall, and area under the curve (AUC). The review covers a wide range of studies, each with its own dataset and methodology. Notable findings include a study employing rsfMRI data from ABIDE that achieved an accuracy of 80% using LeNet. Another study using rsfMRI data from ABIDE-II achieved an impressive accuracy of 95.4% with the ASGCN deep learning model. Studies utilizing different modalities, such as EEG and sMRI, also reported high accuracies ranging from 74% to 95%. Deep learning-based approaches for ASD detection have demonstrated significant potential across multiple neuroimaging modalities. These methods offer a more objective and data-driven approach to diagnosis, potentially reducing the subjectivity associated with clinical evaluations. However, challenges remain, including the need for larger and more diverse datasets, model interpretability, and clinical validation. The field of deep learning in ASD diagnosis continues to evolve, holding promise for early and accurate identification of individuals with ASD, which is crucial for timely intervention and support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信