罗伊法案的废除是否改变了避孕药具的获取和使用?来自美国四个州的新研究提供了重要见解

M. Kavanaugh, Amy Friedrich-Karnik
{"title":"罗伊法案的废除是否改变了避孕药具的获取和使用?来自美国四个州的新研究提供了重要见解","authors":"M. Kavanaugh, Amy Friedrich-Karnik","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The overturning of Roe v. Wade in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision has had vast impacts on abortion access across the United States, but less is known about the wider impacts on people’s contraceptive access. We draw on cross-sectional survey data representative of reproductive-aged women in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin at two timepoints, one prior to and one following the Dobbs decision. We examined changes between these two timepoints in key sexual and reproductive health metrics and, at the post-Dobbs timepoint, differences in these metrics across age, sexual and gender minority status, nativity, and income status. Between these two timepoints, we find statistically significant evidence that sexual activity declined, barriers to accessing contraception increased, reports of receiving high-quality contraceptive care decreased, and condom use increased. As continued fallouts of the Dobbs decision on access to abortion occur, this research makes clear that access to broader contraceptive care is worsening. Policies that promote meaningful access to all forms of sexual and reproductive health care must be advanced to support all individuals’ right to reproductive autonomy while mitigating inequity and inequality.","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has the Fall of Roe Changed Contraceptive Access and Use? New Research from Four US States Offers Critical Insights\",\"authors\":\"M. Kavanaugh, Amy Friedrich-Karnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The overturning of Roe v. Wade in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision has had vast impacts on abortion access across the United States, but less is known about the wider impacts on people’s contraceptive access. We draw on cross-sectional survey data representative of reproductive-aged women in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin at two timepoints, one prior to and one following the Dobbs decision. We examined changes between these two timepoints in key sexual and reproductive health metrics and, at the post-Dobbs timepoint, differences in these metrics across age, sexual and gender minority status, nativity, and income status. Between these two timepoints, we find statistically significant evidence that sexual activity declined, barriers to accessing contraception increased, reports of receiving high-quality contraceptive care decreased, and condom use increased. As continued fallouts of the Dobbs decision on access to abortion occur, this research makes clear that access to broader contraceptive care is worsening. Policies that promote meaningful access to all forms of sexual and reproductive health care must be advanced to support all individuals’ right to reproductive autonomy while mitigating inequity and inequality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年 "多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康案 "的判决推翻了 "罗伊诉韦德案",对全美的堕胎服务产生了巨大影响,但对人们获得避孕药具的更广泛影响却知之甚少。我们利用了亚利桑那州、爱荷华州、新泽西州和威斯康星州育龄妇女在多布斯案判决前后两个时间点的代表性横截面调查数据。我们研究了这两个时间点之间主要性健康和生殖健康指标的变化,以及在多布斯裁决后的时间点上,这些指标在年龄、性和性别少数群体身份、出生地和收入状况方面的差异。在这两个时间点之间,我们发现有统计意义的证据表明,性活动减少了,获得避孕药具的障碍增加了,接受高质量避孕护理的报告减少了,安全套的使用增加了。多布斯案的判决对堕胎的影响仍在继续,这项研究清楚地表明,获得更广泛的避孕护理的情况正在恶化。必须推进促进切实获得各种形式的性健康和生殖健康护理的政策,以支持所有人的生殖自主权,同时减轻不公平和不平等现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Has the Fall of Roe Changed Contraceptive Access and Use? New Research from Four US States Offers Critical Insights
The overturning of Roe v. Wade in the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health decision has had vast impacts on abortion access across the United States, but less is known about the wider impacts on people’s contraceptive access. We draw on cross-sectional survey data representative of reproductive-aged women in Arizona, Iowa, New Jersey, and Wisconsin at two timepoints, one prior to and one following the Dobbs decision. We examined changes between these two timepoints in key sexual and reproductive health metrics and, at the post-Dobbs timepoint, differences in these metrics across age, sexual and gender minority status, nativity, and income status. Between these two timepoints, we find statistically significant evidence that sexual activity declined, barriers to accessing contraception increased, reports of receiving high-quality contraceptive care decreased, and condom use increased. As continued fallouts of the Dobbs decision on access to abortion occur, this research makes clear that access to broader contraceptive care is worsening. Policies that promote meaningful access to all forms of sexual and reproductive health care must be advanced to support all individuals’ right to reproductive autonomy while mitigating inequity and inequality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信