M. van Vliet, S. Monnink, M. Kuiper, J. Constandse, D. Hoftijzer, E. Ronner
{"title":"根据法规标准评估新型无袖带光敏血压计腕带的血压测量效果","authors":"M. van Vliet, S. Monnink, M. Kuiper, J. Constandse, D. Hoftijzer, E. Ronner","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Elevated blood pressure is a key risk factor in cardiovascular diseases. However, obtaining reliable and reproducible blood pressure remains a challenge. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate a novel cuffless wristband, based on photoplethysmography, for continuous blood pressure monitoring.\n \n \n \n Predictions by a photoplethysmography-guided algorithm were compared to arterial blood pressure measurements (in the subclavian artery), obtained during cardiac catheterisation. Eligible patients were included and screened based on AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard requirements. The machine learning-based blood pressure algorithm required three cuff-based initialisation measurements in combination with approximately 100 features (signal-derived and patient demographic-based).\n \n \n \n 97 patients and 420 samples were included. Mean age, weight, and height were 67.1 years (SD 11.1), 83.4 kg (SD 16.1), and 174 cm (SD 10), respectively. Systolic blood pressure was ≤100 mmHg in 48 samples (11%) and ≥160 mmHg in 106 samples (25%). Diastolic blood pressure was ≤70 mmHg in 222 samples (53%) and ≥85 mmHg in 99 samples (24%). The algorithm showed mean errors of ±3.7 mmHg (SD 4.4 mmHg) and ±2.5 mmHg (SD 3.7 mmHg) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Similar results were observed across all genders and skin colours (Fitzpatrick I-VI).\n \n \n \n This study provides initial evidence for the accuracy of a photoplethysmography-based blood pressure algorithm in combination with a cuffless wristband across a range of blood pressure distributions. This research complies with the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard, however, further research is required to evaluate the algorithms performance in light of the remaining European Society of Hypertension recommendations.\n Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05566886.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a novel cuffless photoplethysmography-based wristband for measuring blood pressure according to the regulatory standards\",\"authors\":\"M. van Vliet, S. Monnink, M. Kuiper, J. Constandse, D. Hoftijzer, E. Ronner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Elevated blood pressure is a key risk factor in cardiovascular diseases. However, obtaining reliable and reproducible blood pressure remains a challenge. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate a novel cuffless wristband, based on photoplethysmography, for continuous blood pressure monitoring.\\n \\n \\n \\n Predictions by a photoplethysmography-guided algorithm were compared to arterial blood pressure measurements (in the subclavian artery), obtained during cardiac catheterisation. Eligible patients were included and screened based on AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard requirements. The machine learning-based blood pressure algorithm required three cuff-based initialisation measurements in combination with approximately 100 features (signal-derived and patient demographic-based).\\n \\n \\n \\n 97 patients and 420 samples were included. Mean age, weight, and height were 67.1 years (SD 11.1), 83.4 kg (SD 16.1), and 174 cm (SD 10), respectively. Systolic blood pressure was ≤100 mmHg in 48 samples (11%) and ≥160 mmHg in 106 samples (25%). Diastolic blood pressure was ≤70 mmHg in 222 samples (53%) and ≥85 mmHg in 99 samples (24%). The algorithm showed mean errors of ±3.7 mmHg (SD 4.4 mmHg) and ±2.5 mmHg (SD 3.7 mmHg) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Similar results were observed across all genders and skin colours (Fitzpatrick I-VI).\\n \\n \\n \\n This study provides initial evidence for the accuracy of a photoplethysmography-based blood pressure algorithm in combination with a cuffless wristband across a range of blood pressure distributions. This research complies with the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard, however, further research is required to evaluate the algorithms performance in light of the remaining European Society of Hypertension recommendations.\\n Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05566886.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Digital Health\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of a novel cuffless photoplethysmography-based wristband for measuring blood pressure according to the regulatory standards
Elevated blood pressure is a key risk factor in cardiovascular diseases. However, obtaining reliable and reproducible blood pressure remains a challenge. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate a novel cuffless wristband, based on photoplethysmography, for continuous blood pressure monitoring.
Predictions by a photoplethysmography-guided algorithm were compared to arterial blood pressure measurements (in the subclavian artery), obtained during cardiac catheterisation. Eligible patients were included and screened based on AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard requirements. The machine learning-based blood pressure algorithm required three cuff-based initialisation measurements in combination with approximately 100 features (signal-derived and patient demographic-based).
97 patients and 420 samples were included. Mean age, weight, and height were 67.1 years (SD 11.1), 83.4 kg (SD 16.1), and 174 cm (SD 10), respectively. Systolic blood pressure was ≤100 mmHg in 48 samples (11%) and ≥160 mmHg in 106 samples (25%). Diastolic blood pressure was ≤70 mmHg in 222 samples (53%) and ≥85 mmHg in 99 samples (24%). The algorithm showed mean errors of ±3.7 mmHg (SD 4.4 mmHg) and ±2.5 mmHg (SD 3.7 mmHg) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Similar results were observed across all genders and skin colours (Fitzpatrick I-VI).
This study provides initial evidence for the accuracy of a photoplethysmography-based blood pressure algorithm in combination with a cuffless wristband across a range of blood pressure distributions. This research complies with the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard, however, further research is required to evaluate the algorithms performance in light of the remaining European Society of Hypertension recommendations.
Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05566886.