利用物理引导的 LSTM 网络加强数据驱动的土壤湿度建模

Qingtian Geng, Sen Yan, Qingliang Li, Cheng Zhang
{"title":"利用物理引导的 LSTM 网络加强数据驱动的土壤湿度建模","authors":"Qingtian Geng, Sen Yan, Qingliang Li, Cheng Zhang","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1353011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, deep learning methods have shown significant potential in soil moisture modeling. However, a prominent limitation of deep learning approaches has been the absence of physical mechanisms. To address this challenge, this study introduces two novel loss functions designed around physical mechanisms to guide deep learning models in capturing physical information within the data. These two loss functions are crafted to leverage the monotonic relationships between surface water variables and shallow soil moisture as well as deep soil water. Based on these physically-guided loss functions, two physically-guided Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, denoted as PHY-LSTM and PHYs-LSTM, are proposed. These networks are trained on the global ERA5-Land dataset, and the results indicate a notable performance improvement over traditional LSTM models. When used for global soil moisture forecasting for the upcoming day, PHY-LSTM and PHYs-LSTM models exhibit closely comparable results. In comparison to conventional data-driven LSTM models, both models display a substantial enhancement in various evaluation metrics. Specifically, PHYs-LSTM exhibits improvements in several key performance indicators: an increase of 13.6% in Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), a 20.7% increase in Coefficient of Determination (R2), an 8.2% reduction in Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and a 4.4% increase in correlation coefficient (R). PHY-LSTM also demonstrates improvements, with a 14.8% increase in KGE, a 19.6% increase in R2, an 8.2% reduction in RMSE, and a 4.4% increase in R. Additionally, both models exhibit enhanced physical consistency over a wide geographical area. Experimental results strongly emphasize that the incorporation of physical mechanisms can significantly bolster the predictive capabilities of data-driven soil moisture models.","PeriodicalId":507254,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":" 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing data-driven soil moisture modeling with physically-guided LSTM networks\",\"authors\":\"Qingtian Geng, Sen Yan, Qingliang Li, Cheng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1353011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, deep learning methods have shown significant potential in soil moisture modeling. However, a prominent limitation of deep learning approaches has been the absence of physical mechanisms. To address this challenge, this study introduces two novel loss functions designed around physical mechanisms to guide deep learning models in capturing physical information within the data. These two loss functions are crafted to leverage the monotonic relationships between surface water variables and shallow soil moisture as well as deep soil water. Based on these physically-guided loss functions, two physically-guided Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, denoted as PHY-LSTM and PHYs-LSTM, are proposed. These networks are trained on the global ERA5-Land dataset, and the results indicate a notable performance improvement over traditional LSTM models. When used for global soil moisture forecasting for the upcoming day, PHY-LSTM and PHYs-LSTM models exhibit closely comparable results. In comparison to conventional data-driven LSTM models, both models display a substantial enhancement in various evaluation metrics. Specifically, PHYs-LSTM exhibits improvements in several key performance indicators: an increase of 13.6% in Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), a 20.7% increase in Coefficient of Determination (R2), an 8.2% reduction in Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and a 4.4% increase in correlation coefficient (R). PHY-LSTM also demonstrates improvements, with a 14.8% increase in KGE, a 19.6% increase in R2, an 8.2% reduction in RMSE, and a 4.4% increase in R. Additionally, both models exhibit enhanced physical consistency over a wide geographical area. Experimental results strongly emphasize that the incorporation of physical mechanisms can significantly bolster the predictive capabilities of data-driven soil moisture models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"volume\":\" 33\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1353011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1353011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,深度学习方法在土壤水分建模方面显示出巨大潜力。然而,深度学习方法的一个突出局限是缺乏物理机制。为了应对这一挑战,本研究引入了两个围绕物理机制设计的新型损失函数,以指导深度学习模型捕捉数据中的物理信息。这两个损失函数的设计充分利用了地表水变量与浅层土壤水分以及深层土壤水分之间的单调关系。基于这些物理引导的损失函数,提出了两个物理引导的长短期记忆(LSTM)网络,分别称为 PHY-LSTM 和 PHYs-LSTM。这些网络在全球ERA5-Land数据集上进行了训练,结果表明其性能明显优于传统的LSTM模型。当用于未来一天的全球土壤湿度预测时,PHY-LSTM 和 PHYs-LSTM 模型的结果非常接近。与传统的数据驱动 LSTM 模型相比,这两种模型在各种评估指标上都有大幅提升。具体来说,PHYs-LSTM 在几个关键性能指标上都有所提高:Kling-Gupta 效率 (KGE) 提高了 13.6%,决定系数 (R2) 提高了 20.7%,均方根误差 (RMSE) 降低了 8.2%,相关系数 (R) 提高了 4.4%。PHY-LSTM 也有所改进,KGE 增加了 14.8%,R2 增加了 19.6%,RMSE 减少了 8.2%,R 增加了 4.4%。实验结果有力地证明,将物理机制纳入土壤水分模型可以显著提高数据驱动型土壤水分模型的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing data-driven soil moisture modeling with physically-guided LSTM networks
In recent years, deep learning methods have shown significant potential in soil moisture modeling. However, a prominent limitation of deep learning approaches has been the absence of physical mechanisms. To address this challenge, this study introduces two novel loss functions designed around physical mechanisms to guide deep learning models in capturing physical information within the data. These two loss functions are crafted to leverage the monotonic relationships between surface water variables and shallow soil moisture as well as deep soil water. Based on these physically-guided loss functions, two physically-guided Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, denoted as PHY-LSTM and PHYs-LSTM, are proposed. These networks are trained on the global ERA5-Land dataset, and the results indicate a notable performance improvement over traditional LSTM models. When used for global soil moisture forecasting for the upcoming day, PHY-LSTM and PHYs-LSTM models exhibit closely comparable results. In comparison to conventional data-driven LSTM models, both models display a substantial enhancement in various evaluation metrics. Specifically, PHYs-LSTM exhibits improvements in several key performance indicators: an increase of 13.6% in Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), a 20.7% increase in Coefficient of Determination (R2), an 8.2% reduction in Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and a 4.4% increase in correlation coefficient (R). PHY-LSTM also demonstrates improvements, with a 14.8% increase in KGE, a 19.6% increase in R2, an 8.2% reduction in RMSE, and a 4.4% increase in R. Additionally, both models exhibit enhanced physical consistency over a wide geographical area. Experimental results strongly emphasize that the incorporation of physical mechanisms can significantly bolster the predictive capabilities of data-driven soil moisture models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信