斯洛伐克和捷克公司在履行企业社会责任方面的差异

Q1 Social Sciences
Jana Kozáková, M. Urbánová, Renta Skýpalová
{"title":"斯洛伐克和捷克公司在履行企业社会责任方面的差异","authors":"Jana Kozáková, M. Urbánová, Renta Skýpalová","doi":"10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, corporate social responsibility has emerged as a pivotal factor for corporations in cultivating a favorable public perception. Despite this, many companies remain uncertain about the integration and rationale behind incorporating it into their core business strategies. This study aims to discern dissimilarities in implementing corporate social responsibility initiatives between Slovak and Czech companies, addressing the triple bottom line framework. This approach is a metric for evaluating a company’s achievement across three dimensions: social, environmental, and economic. The study is predicated on a questionnaire survey conducted among a sample of 180 Slovak and 180 Czech companies operating as subsidiaries of multinational corporations as typical implementers of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging economies. Following the triple bottom line framework, three distinct sets of variables were formulated to account for social, environmental, and economic activities using the Mann-Whitney U Test to ascertain statistically significant disparities between Slovak and Czech companies. The findings indicate that the surveyed companies from monitored countries exhibited no notable distinctions in environmental endeavors. However, discrepancies were discerned in economic activities, specifically relating to post-sales or post-warranty customer services, which was significant with a small effect size (0.19). In social activities, significant differences were observed concerning adherence to the principle of equal opportunities in the workplace. Based on these outcomes, it is recommended that future investigations delve more extensively into the monitored parameters within the Visegrad countries.\nAcknowledgmentThe paper was prepared within the project “Etika v podnikaní na Slovensku” no. 01/2022/GA FEM SPU supported by Grant Agency – Faculty of Economics and Management – Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra and internal grand of AMBIS college.","PeriodicalId":20521,"journal":{"name":"Problems and perspectives in management","volume":" 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in corporate social responsibility implementation between Slovak and Czech companies\",\"authors\":\"Jana Kozáková, M. Urbánová, Renta Skýpalová\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, corporate social responsibility has emerged as a pivotal factor for corporations in cultivating a favorable public perception. Despite this, many companies remain uncertain about the integration and rationale behind incorporating it into their core business strategies. This study aims to discern dissimilarities in implementing corporate social responsibility initiatives between Slovak and Czech companies, addressing the triple bottom line framework. This approach is a metric for evaluating a company’s achievement across three dimensions: social, environmental, and economic. The study is predicated on a questionnaire survey conducted among a sample of 180 Slovak and 180 Czech companies operating as subsidiaries of multinational corporations as typical implementers of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging economies. Following the triple bottom line framework, three distinct sets of variables were formulated to account for social, environmental, and economic activities using the Mann-Whitney U Test to ascertain statistically significant disparities between Slovak and Czech companies. The findings indicate that the surveyed companies from monitored countries exhibited no notable distinctions in environmental endeavors. However, discrepancies were discerned in economic activities, specifically relating to post-sales or post-warranty customer services, which was significant with a small effect size (0.19). In social activities, significant differences were observed concerning adherence to the principle of equal opportunities in the workplace. Based on these outcomes, it is recommended that future investigations delve more extensively into the monitored parameters within the Visegrad countries.\\nAcknowledgmentThe paper was prepared within the project “Etika v podnikaní na Slovensku” no. 01/2022/GA FEM SPU supported by Grant Agency – Faculty of Economics and Management – Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra and internal grand of AMBIS college.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems and perspectives in management\",\"volume\":\" 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems and perspectives in management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems and perspectives in management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,企业社会责任已成为企业培养良好公众形象的关键因素。尽管如此,许多公司仍然不确定将社会责任纳入其核心业务战略的整合性和合理性。本研究旨在通过三重底线框架,找出斯洛伐克和捷克公司在实施企业社会责任倡议方面的差异。这种方法是评估公司在社会、环境和经济三个方面所取得成就的一种衡量标准。本研究以问卷调查为基础,抽样调查了 180 家斯洛伐克公司和 180 家捷克公司,这些公司作为跨国公司的子公司,是新兴经济体中企业社会责任活动的典型实施者。根据三重底线框架,我们制定了社会、环境和经济活动的三组不同变量,并使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验法来确定斯洛伐克和捷克公司之间在统计上的显著差异。调查结果表明,受监测国家的受访公司在环保活动方面没有明显差异。然而,在经济活动中,特别是与售后或保修期后客户服务有关的活动中,发现了差异,差异显著,但影响程度较小(0.19)。在社会活动方面,在遵守工作场所机会均等原则方面存在重大差异。基于这些结果,建议今后对维谢格拉德国家内的监测参数进行更广泛的调查。 鸣谢本文是在 "Etika v podnikaní na Slovensku "项目(编号:01/2022/GA FEM SPU)内撰写的,该项目由拨款机构--尼特拉斯洛伐克农业大学经济与管理学院和 AMBIS 学院内部大力支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in corporate social responsibility implementation between Slovak and Czech companies
In recent years, corporate social responsibility has emerged as a pivotal factor for corporations in cultivating a favorable public perception. Despite this, many companies remain uncertain about the integration and rationale behind incorporating it into their core business strategies. This study aims to discern dissimilarities in implementing corporate social responsibility initiatives between Slovak and Czech companies, addressing the triple bottom line framework. This approach is a metric for evaluating a company’s achievement across three dimensions: social, environmental, and economic. The study is predicated on a questionnaire survey conducted among a sample of 180 Slovak and 180 Czech companies operating as subsidiaries of multinational corporations as typical implementers of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging economies. Following the triple bottom line framework, three distinct sets of variables were formulated to account for social, environmental, and economic activities using the Mann-Whitney U Test to ascertain statistically significant disparities between Slovak and Czech companies. The findings indicate that the surveyed companies from monitored countries exhibited no notable distinctions in environmental endeavors. However, discrepancies were discerned in economic activities, specifically relating to post-sales or post-warranty customer services, which was significant with a small effect size (0.19). In social activities, significant differences were observed concerning adherence to the principle of equal opportunities in the workplace. Based on these outcomes, it is recommended that future investigations delve more extensively into the monitored parameters within the Visegrad countries. AcknowledgmentThe paper was prepared within the project “Etika v podnikaní na Slovensku” no. 01/2022/GA FEM SPU supported by Grant Agency – Faculty of Economics and Management – Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra and internal grand of AMBIS college.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is coverage of different aspects of management and governance, such as international organizations and communities’ management, state and regional governance, company’s management, etc. The key aspects of planning, organization, motivation and control in various areas and in different countries are subject of the journal''s scope. The journal publishes articles, which are focused on existing and new methods, techniques and approaches in the field of management. It publishes contemporary and innovative researches, including theoretical and empirical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信