重塑选择,优化疾病预测和政策

Gabriela M Gomes, Andrew M Blagborough, Kate e. Langwig, Beate Ringwald
{"title":"重塑选择,优化疾病预测和政策","authors":"Gabriela M Gomes, Andrew M Blagborough, Kate e. Langwig, Beate Ringwald","doi":"10.1088/1751-8121/ad280d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mathematical models are increasingly adopted for setting disease prevention and control targets. As model-informed policies are implemented, however, the inaccuracies of some forecasts become apparent, for example overprediction of infection burdens and intervention impacts. Here, we attribute these discrepancies to methodological limitations in capturing the heterogeneities of real-world systems. The mechanisms underpinning risk factors of infection and their interactions determine individual propensities to acquire disease. These factors are potentially so numerous and complex that to attain a full mechanistic description is likely unfeasible. To contribute constructively to the development of health policies, model developers either leave factors out (reductionism) or adopt a broader but coarse description (holism). In our view, predictive capacity requires holistic descriptions of heterogeneity which are currently underutilised in infectious disease epidemiology, in comparison to other population disciplines, such as non-communicable disease epidemiology, demography, ecology and evolution.","PeriodicalId":502730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical","volume":" 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remodelling selection to optimise disease forecasts and policies\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela M Gomes, Andrew M Blagborough, Kate e. Langwig, Beate Ringwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1751-8121/ad280d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Mathematical models are increasingly adopted for setting disease prevention and control targets. As model-informed policies are implemented, however, the inaccuracies of some forecasts become apparent, for example overprediction of infection burdens and intervention impacts. Here, we attribute these discrepancies to methodological limitations in capturing the heterogeneities of real-world systems. The mechanisms underpinning risk factors of infection and their interactions determine individual propensities to acquire disease. These factors are potentially so numerous and complex that to attain a full mechanistic description is likely unfeasible. To contribute constructively to the development of health policies, model developers either leave factors out (reductionism) or adopt a broader but coarse description (holism). In our view, predictive capacity requires holistic descriptions of heterogeneity which are currently underutilised in infectious disease epidemiology, in comparison to other population disciplines, such as non-communicable disease epidemiology, demography, ecology and evolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical\",\"volume\":\" 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad280d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad280d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学模型越来越多地被用于制定疾病预防和控制目标。然而,随着以模型为依据的政策的实施,一些预测的不准确性逐渐显现出来,例如对感染负担和干预效果的预测过高。在此,我们将这些差异归因于在捕捉真实世界系统的异质性方面存在方法上的局限性。感染风险因素的基本机制及其相互作用决定了个人感染疾病的倾向。这些因素可能非常多而且非常复杂,要想获得完整的机理描述很可能是不可行的。为了对卫生政策的制定做出建设性的贡献,模型开发者要么将各种因素排除在外(还原论),要么采用更广泛但粗糙的描述(整体论)。我们认为,预测能力需要对异质性进行整体描述,与非传染性疾病流行病学、人口学、生态学和进化论等其他人口学科相比,传染病流行病学目前对异质性的描述不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remodelling selection to optimise disease forecasts and policies
Mathematical models are increasingly adopted for setting disease prevention and control targets. As model-informed policies are implemented, however, the inaccuracies of some forecasts become apparent, for example overprediction of infection burdens and intervention impacts. Here, we attribute these discrepancies to methodological limitations in capturing the heterogeneities of real-world systems. The mechanisms underpinning risk factors of infection and their interactions determine individual propensities to acquire disease. These factors are potentially so numerous and complex that to attain a full mechanistic description is likely unfeasible. To contribute constructively to the development of health policies, model developers either leave factors out (reductionism) or adopt a broader but coarse description (holism). In our view, predictive capacity requires holistic descriptions of heterogeneity which are currently underutilised in infectious disease epidemiology, in comparison to other population disciplines, such as non-communicable disease epidemiology, demography, ecology and evolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信