校本管理、学校结构、绩效工资:第十一区公立学校有效发展的因果模型

Rugene D. Ibarra, Eugenio S. Guhao, JR
{"title":"校本管理、学校结构、绩效工资:第十一区公立学校有效发展的因果模型","authors":"Rugene D. Ibarra, Eugenio S. Guhao, JR","doi":"10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i31286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the best-fit model for effective performance management and development in public schools. Using descriptive-correlational and Structural Equation Modeling, the writer selected 400 Secondary Teacher I to Teacher III respondents from the eleven divisions of Davao Region, Philippines, through stratified sampling. This study adapted four downloaded questionnaires from internet sources. The questionnaires were modified and included only the items relevant to the study. The draft was submitted to the writer's adviser for comments and suggestions. Results revealed very high levels of school-based management, and school structure, while pay-for-performance showed high results. On the other hand, the endogenous performance management and development of teachers obtained a very high level of descriptive equivalent. Significant correlations existed between the three exogenous variables: school-based management, school structure, and pay-for-performance, and the endogenous variable, effective performance management and development. Findings also revealed that Model 3 portrayed the best-fit model exhibiting direct causal relationships of school-based management, school structure, and pay-for-performance on performance management and development. Further structure modifications showed that Performance Management and Development were defined by its retained indicators: Performance Review Meeting, Motivation, and Career Development. Moreover, School-based Management was described by its domains: Leadership and Governance, Curriculum and Instruction, and Resources Management. Also, School Structure was ascertained by its retained indicators: Physical Structure of the Building, and Organizational Structure of the Building. Finally, Pay-for-Performance was determined by its domains: Performance Pay, and Development and Evaluation. The findings of this study may shed light and ameliorate cognizance concerning how institutions may boost organizational efficiency.","PeriodicalId":262869,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","volume":"116 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School-Based Management, School Structure, Pay–Pay-for-Performance: A Causal Model on Effective Development in Public Schools in Region XI\",\"authors\":\"Rugene D. Ibarra, Eugenio S. Guhao, JR\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i31286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to determine the best-fit model for effective performance management and development in public schools. Using descriptive-correlational and Structural Equation Modeling, the writer selected 400 Secondary Teacher I to Teacher III respondents from the eleven divisions of Davao Region, Philippines, through stratified sampling. This study adapted four downloaded questionnaires from internet sources. The questionnaires were modified and included only the items relevant to the study. The draft was submitted to the writer's adviser for comments and suggestions. Results revealed very high levels of school-based management, and school structure, while pay-for-performance showed high results. On the other hand, the endogenous performance management and development of teachers obtained a very high level of descriptive equivalent. Significant correlations existed between the three exogenous variables: school-based management, school structure, and pay-for-performance, and the endogenous variable, effective performance management and development. Findings also revealed that Model 3 portrayed the best-fit model exhibiting direct causal relationships of school-based management, school structure, and pay-for-performance on performance management and development. Further structure modifications showed that Performance Management and Development were defined by its retained indicators: Performance Review Meeting, Motivation, and Career Development. Moreover, School-based Management was described by its domains: Leadership and Governance, Curriculum and Instruction, and Resources Management. Also, School Structure was ascertained by its retained indicators: Physical Structure of the Building, and Organizational Structure of the Building. Finally, Pay-for-Performance was determined by its domains: Performance Pay, and Development and Evaluation. The findings of this study may shed light and ameliorate cognizance concerning how institutions may boost organizational efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"116 31\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i31286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i31286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定公立学校有效绩效管理与发展的最佳模型。作者采用描述-相关和结构方程模型,通过分层抽样,从菲律宾达沃地区的 11 个分区选取了 400 名中学一级至三级教师作为调查对象。本研究改编了从互联网上下载的四份问卷。问卷经过修改,只包含与本研究相关的项目。草案已提交给作者的顾问征求意见和建议。结果显示,校本管理和学校结构的水平非常高,而绩效工资的结果也很高。另一方面,内生绩效管理和教师发展获得了非常高的描述性等效水平。校本管理、学校结构和绩效工资这三个外生变量与有效的绩效管理和发展这一内生变量之间存在着显著的相关性。研究结果还显示,模型 3 是最合适的模型,显示了校本管理、学校结构和绩效工资对绩效管理与发展的直接因果关系。进一步的结构修改表明,绩效管理与发展是由其保留的指标来定义的:绩效评估会议、激励和职业发展。此外,校本管理由其领域来描述:领导与治理、课程与教学、资源管理。学校结构也通过其保留指标来确定:教学楼的物质结构和教学楼的组织结构。最后,绩效工资由其领域决定:绩效工资和发展与评估。本研究的结果可以帮助人们更好地认识和了解机构如何提高组织效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
School-Based Management, School Structure, Pay–Pay-for-Performance: A Causal Model on Effective Development in Public Schools in Region XI
This study aimed to determine the best-fit model for effective performance management and development in public schools. Using descriptive-correlational and Structural Equation Modeling, the writer selected 400 Secondary Teacher I to Teacher III respondents from the eleven divisions of Davao Region, Philippines, through stratified sampling. This study adapted four downloaded questionnaires from internet sources. The questionnaires were modified and included only the items relevant to the study. The draft was submitted to the writer's adviser for comments and suggestions. Results revealed very high levels of school-based management, and school structure, while pay-for-performance showed high results. On the other hand, the endogenous performance management and development of teachers obtained a very high level of descriptive equivalent. Significant correlations existed between the three exogenous variables: school-based management, school structure, and pay-for-performance, and the endogenous variable, effective performance management and development. Findings also revealed that Model 3 portrayed the best-fit model exhibiting direct causal relationships of school-based management, school structure, and pay-for-performance on performance management and development. Further structure modifications showed that Performance Management and Development were defined by its retained indicators: Performance Review Meeting, Motivation, and Career Development. Moreover, School-based Management was described by its domains: Leadership and Governance, Curriculum and Instruction, and Resources Management. Also, School Structure was ascertained by its retained indicators: Physical Structure of the Building, and Organizational Structure of the Building. Finally, Pay-for-Performance was determined by its domains: Performance Pay, and Development and Evaluation. The findings of this study may shed light and ameliorate cognizance concerning how institutions may boost organizational efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信