{"title":"网络内容监管决策指南","authors":"Dan Svantesson","doi":"10.1177/1037969x241231327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the seven standard questions that must be confronted in nearly all decisions in the online content regulation field. By mapping out and discussing those standard questions, the article may hopefully aid both legislators and judges engaged in online content regulation. The checklist of questions canvassed here may also be used as a tool to evaluate laws aimed at online content regulation as well as judgments made within this field.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A decision-making guide for online content regulation\",\"authors\":\"Dan Svantesson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969x241231327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the seven standard questions that must be confronted in nearly all decisions in the online content regulation field. By mapping out and discussing those standard questions, the article may hopefully aid both legislators and judges engaged in online content regulation. The checklist of questions canvassed here may also be used as a tool to evaluate laws aimed at online content regulation as well as judgments made within this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241231327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241231327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
A decision-making guide for online content regulation
This article examines the seven standard questions that must be confronted in nearly all decisions in the online content regulation field. By mapping out and discussing those standard questions, the article may hopefully aid both legislators and judges engaged in online content regulation. The checklist of questions canvassed here may also be used as a tool to evaluate laws aimed at online content regulation as well as judgments made within this field.