带扇形空腔的微通道散热器空腔区域中圆柱形肋条排列的影响

Saqib Ali, Shahnwaz Alam, Mohammad Nawaz Khan
{"title":"带扇形空腔的微通道散热器空腔区域中圆柱形肋条排列的影响","authors":"Saqib Ali, Shahnwaz Alam, Mohammad Nawaz Khan","doi":"10.1177/09544089241231481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fan-shaped cavity microchannel heatsink with the combination of ribs is an effective configuration to dissipate large amounts of heat at the expense of lower pressure drop. However, the most effective location of circular ribs within a fan-shaped cavity which enhances the performance of a microchannel heat sink is still unknown. In this work, seven different structural units based on the ribs location in the cavity region such as ribs at the front of the cavities (RFC), at the back (RBC), at the centre (RCC), at the front and back (RFBC), at the left (RLC), at the right (RRC) and at the left and right (RLRC) are analysed for the range of Reynolds number from 100 to 500 and the results are compared with the microchannel with fan-shaped cavity only (MHFC) and plain rectangular microchannel heat sink on the basis of Nusselt number, interface temperature, pressure drop and performance factor. A notable finding of this study is identifying a rib as a disruption leading to the splitting of flow into two streams towards the arcuate region of the cavity and results in the enhanced mixing of the mainstream flow and the trapped fluid in the arcuate region. The maximum Nusselt number is exhibited by the RFBC with an increment of about 19% relative to the conventional centre location of the ribs in the cavity (RCC). At a lower Reynolds number, the Nusselt number of RLRC is lower than RCC and RBC however at Re > 300, the Nusselt number of RLRC is nearly equal to RCC whereas the minimum Nusselt number is associated with RRC and RLC among the microchannels having cavities and ribs. Along with the highest Nusselt number the largest value of pressure drop is also associated with RFBC whereas minimum pressure drop is accompanied by RRC and RLC.","PeriodicalId":506108,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering","volume":"75 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of cylindrical ribs arrangement in the cavity region of the microchannel heatsink with a fan-shaped cavity\",\"authors\":\"Saqib Ali, Shahnwaz Alam, Mohammad Nawaz Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544089241231481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fan-shaped cavity microchannel heatsink with the combination of ribs is an effective configuration to dissipate large amounts of heat at the expense of lower pressure drop. However, the most effective location of circular ribs within a fan-shaped cavity which enhances the performance of a microchannel heat sink is still unknown. In this work, seven different structural units based on the ribs location in the cavity region such as ribs at the front of the cavities (RFC), at the back (RBC), at the centre (RCC), at the front and back (RFBC), at the left (RLC), at the right (RRC) and at the left and right (RLRC) are analysed for the range of Reynolds number from 100 to 500 and the results are compared with the microchannel with fan-shaped cavity only (MHFC) and plain rectangular microchannel heat sink on the basis of Nusselt number, interface temperature, pressure drop and performance factor. A notable finding of this study is identifying a rib as a disruption leading to the splitting of flow into two streams towards the arcuate region of the cavity and results in the enhanced mixing of the mainstream flow and the trapped fluid in the arcuate region. The maximum Nusselt number is exhibited by the RFBC with an increment of about 19% relative to the conventional centre location of the ribs in the cavity (RCC). At a lower Reynolds number, the Nusselt number of RLRC is lower than RCC and RBC however at Re > 300, the Nusselt number of RLRC is nearly equal to RCC whereas the minimum Nusselt number is associated with RRC and RLC among the microchannels having cavities and ribs. Along with the highest Nusselt number the largest value of pressure drop is also associated with RFBC whereas minimum pressure drop is accompanied by RRC and RLC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"75 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241231481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241231481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扇形腔微通道散热器与肋条的组合是一种有效的配置,可以以较低的压降为代价散发大量热量。然而,扇形腔内最有效的环形肋条位置如何提高微通道散热器的性能仍是一个未知数。在这项工作中,根据肋条在空腔区域的位置,设计了七种不同的结构单元,如位于空腔前部(RFC)、后部(RBC)、中心(RCC)、前后(RFBC)、左侧(RLC)、右侧(RRC)和中间(RCC)的肋条、分析了雷诺数在 100 到 500 之间的微通道、右侧微通道 (RRC) 和左右侧微通道 (RLRC),并根据努塞尔特数、界面温度、压降和性能系数,将分析结果与仅带扇形空腔的微通道 (MHFC) 和普通矩形微通道散热器进行了比较。本研究的一个显著发现是,肋条作为一种扰动,会导致流体分成两股流向空腔的弧形区域,并导致主流流体与弧形区域的被截留流体的混合增强。相对于传统的腔内肋条中心位置(RCC),RFBC 的最大努塞尔特数增加了约 19%。在雷诺数较低时,RLRC 的努塞特数低于 RCC 和 RBC,但当雷诺数大于 300 时,RLRC 的努塞特数几乎等于 RCC,而在具有空腔和肋条的微通道中,RRC 和 RLC 的努塞特数最小。除了最高的努塞尔特数之外,RFBC 的压降值也最大,而 RRC 和 RLC 的压降值最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of cylindrical ribs arrangement in the cavity region of the microchannel heatsink with a fan-shaped cavity
Fan-shaped cavity microchannel heatsink with the combination of ribs is an effective configuration to dissipate large amounts of heat at the expense of lower pressure drop. However, the most effective location of circular ribs within a fan-shaped cavity which enhances the performance of a microchannel heat sink is still unknown. In this work, seven different structural units based on the ribs location in the cavity region such as ribs at the front of the cavities (RFC), at the back (RBC), at the centre (RCC), at the front and back (RFBC), at the left (RLC), at the right (RRC) and at the left and right (RLRC) are analysed for the range of Reynolds number from 100 to 500 and the results are compared with the microchannel with fan-shaped cavity only (MHFC) and plain rectangular microchannel heat sink on the basis of Nusselt number, interface temperature, pressure drop and performance factor. A notable finding of this study is identifying a rib as a disruption leading to the splitting of flow into two streams towards the arcuate region of the cavity and results in the enhanced mixing of the mainstream flow and the trapped fluid in the arcuate region. The maximum Nusselt number is exhibited by the RFBC with an increment of about 19% relative to the conventional centre location of the ribs in the cavity (RCC). At a lower Reynolds number, the Nusselt number of RLRC is lower than RCC and RBC however at Re > 300, the Nusselt number of RLRC is nearly equal to RCC whereas the minimum Nusselt number is associated with RRC and RLC among the microchannels having cavities and ribs. Along with the highest Nusselt number the largest value of pressure drop is also associated with RFBC whereas minimum pressure drop is accompanied by RRC and RLC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信